BSTRACT: The aim of this study was to expand the International Water Association Activated Sludge Model No. 2d (ASM2d) to account for a newly defined readiiy biodegradable substrate that can be consumed by polyphosphate-accumulating organisms (PAOs) under anoxic and aerobic conditions, but not under anaerobic conditions. The model change was to add a new substrate component and process terms for its use by PAOs and other heterotrophic bacteria under anoxic and aerobic conditions. The Gdansk (Poland) wastewater treatment plant (WWTP), which has a modified University of Cape Town (MUCT) process for nutrient removal, provided field data and mixed liquor for batch tests for model evaluation. The original ASM2d was first calibrated under dynamic conditions with the results of batch tests with settled wastewater and mixed liquor, in which nitrate-uptake rates, phosphorus-release rates, and anoxic phosphorus uptake rates were followed. Model validation was conducted with data from a 96-hour measurement campaign in the full-scale WWTP. The results of similar batch tests with ethanol and fusel oil as the external carbon sources were used to adjust kinetic and stoichiometric coefficients in the expanded ASM2d. Both models were compared based on their predictions of the effect of adding supplemental carbon to the anoxic zone of an MUCT process. In comparison with the ASM2d, the new model better predicted the anoxic behaviors of carbonaceous oxygen demand, nitrate-nitrogen (NOi-N), and phosphorous (PO4-P) in batch experiments with ethanol and fusel oil. However, when simulating ethanol addition to the anoxic zone of a full-scale biological nutrient removal facility, both models predicted similar effluent NO3-N concentrations (6.6 to 6.9 g N/m^). For the particular application, effective enhanced biological phosphorus removal was predicted by both models with external carbon addition but, for the new model, the effluent PO4-P concentration was approximately onehalf of that found from ASM2d. On a PO4-P removal percentage basis, the difference was small, that is, 94.1 vs 97.1%, respectively, for the ASM2d and expanded ASM2d. Water Environ. Res., 84, 646 (2012).
Food industry effluents are considered a potential alternative for methanol when seeking external carbon sources to enhance denitrification in municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). The aim of this study was to determine the immediate effects of dosing different carbon sources on the denitrification capability of process biomass from the Wschod WWTP in Gdansk (northern Poland). Five carbon sources, including settled wastewater, methanol, and three industrial effluents (distillery, brewery, and fish-pickling process) were tested in two kinds of batch experiments. The acclimation period of biomass to methanol also was investigated in bench-scale systems. During the conventional batch experiments, with the industrial effluents, the observed nitrate utilization rates (NURs) ranged from 2.4 to 6.0 g N/(kg VSS?h), which were only slightly lower than the rates associated with the use of the readily biodegradable fraction in the municipal (settled) wastewater [4.6 to 7.8 g N/(kg VSS?h)]. The conventional NURs observed with methanol and non-acclimated process biomass were low [i.e., 0.4 to 1.5 g N/(kg VSS?h)], and a minimum 2-week acclimation period of biomass to methanol in the bench-scale systems was needed to reach the level of 4.0 g N/(kg VSS?h). In other experiments, dosing the distillery and fish-pickling effluents at the beginning of the anoxic phase (preceded by the anaerobic phase) resulted in considerably higher (over 20%) NURs compared with the same experiments with the other carbon sources. Water Environ. Res., 81, 896 (2009).
The most challenging issue for existing large WWTPs (>100,000 PE) in Poland will be achievement of the new effluent standards for total nitrogen. Consequently, reliable and accurate information concerning the dimensioning of anoxic compartments is necessary. This study focused on validating to what extent the denitrification rates determined from batch tests were comparable with the rates calculated based on a mass balance over a full-scale activated sludge reactor. The experiments were conducted at two large WWTPs in northern Poland: "Wschod" in Gdansk and "Debogorze" in Gdynia. Two types of batch tests were used to determine the denitrification capability of activated sludge. Lower nitrate utilization rates observed during the full-scale experiments could potentially result from the local disturbances such as nitrate limitation ("Wschod" WWTP) or oxygen penetration to the anoxic zone ("Debogorze" WWTP). These factors should be taken into consideration during the design phase of the anoxic compartments.
This paper presents effects of dispersion on predicting longitudinal ammonia concentration profiles in activated sludge bioreactor located at "Wschod" WWTP in Gdansk. The aim of this study was to use the one-dimensional advection-dispersion Equation (ADE) to simulate the flow conditions (based on the inert tracer concentrations in selected points) and longitudinal profile of reactive pollutant (based on the ammonia concentration profiles in selected points). The simulation results were compared with the predictions obtained using a traditional "tanks-in-series" (TIS) approach, commonly used in designing biological reactors. The use of dispersion coefficient calculated from an empirical formula resulted in substantial differences in the tracer concentration distributions in two sampling points in the bioreactor. Simulations using the one-dimensional ADE and TIS model, with the nitrification rate incorporated as the source term, revealed that the hydraulic model plays a minor role compared to the biochemical transformations in predicting the longitudinal ammonia concentration profiles.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.