This article examines the response of the leading British socialist H. M. Hyndman to the British empire. It suggests that historians have provided an oversimplified and inaccurate account of that response, despite the significance and influence of his critique. This article examines Hyndman's analyses of empire in greater detail, considering many more public and private sources. It charts the chronological development of his response, examining the context, comparing his views with those of other British and continental socialists, Marx, and the ideas of ‘new imperialism’ generally. The article ultimately argues that though Hyndman's response evolved, with changes of direction missed by historians, he would remain a constant critic of his imperial world.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.