Electromyography and ultrasonography provide complementary information about electrophysiological and physical (i.e. anatomical and mechanical) muscle properties. In this study, we propose a method to assess the electrical and physical properties of single motor units (MUs) by combining High-Density surface Electromyography (HDsEMG) and ultrafast ultrasonography (US). Individual MU firings extracted from HDsEMG were used to identify the corresponding region of muscle tissue displacement in US videos. The time evolution of the tissue velocity in the identified region was regarded as the MU tissue displacement velocity. The method was tested in simulated conditions and applied to experimental signals to study the local association between the amplitude distribution of single MU action potentials and the identified displacement area. We were able to identify the location of simulated MUs in the muscle cross-section within a 2 mm error and to reconstruct the simulated MU displacement velocity (cc > 0.85). Multiple regression analysis of 180 experimental MUs detected during isometric contractions of the biceps brachii revealed a significant association between the identified location of MU displacement areas and the centroid of the EMG amplitude distribution. The proposed approach has the potential to enable non-invasive assessment of the electrical, anatomical, and mechanical properties of single MUs in voluntary contractions.
Muscle fasciculations, resulting from the spontaneous activation of motor neurons, may be associated with neurological disorders, and are often assessed with intramuscular electromyography (EMG). Recently, however, both ultrasound (US) imaging and multichannel surface EMG have been shown to be more sensitive to fasciculations. In this study we combined these two techniques to compare their detection sensitivity to fasciculations occurring in different muscle regions and to investigate the effect of EMG electrodes' configuration on their agreement. Monopolar surface EMGs were collected from medial gastrocnemius and soleus with an array of 32 electrodes (10 mm Inter-Electrode Distance, IED) simultaneously with b-mode US images detected alongside either proximal, central or distal electrodes groups. Fasciculation potentials (FP) were identified from single differential EMGs with 10 mm (SD1), 20 mm (SD2) and 30 mm (SD3) IEDs, and fasciculation events (FE) from US image sequences. The number, location, and size of FEs and FPs in 10 heathy participants were analyzed. Overall, the two techniques showed similar sensitivities to muscle fasciculations. US was equally sensitive to FE occurring in the proximal and distal calf regions, while the number of FP revealed by EMG increased significantly with the IED and was larger distally, where the depth of FE decreased. The agreement between the two techniques was relatively low, with a percentage of fasciculation classified as common ranging from 22% for the smallest IED to 68% for the largest IED. The relevant number of events uniquely detected by the two techniques is discussed in terms of different spatial sensitivities of EMG and US, which suggest that a combination of US-EMG is likely to maximise the sensitivity to muscle fasciculations.
Electrical stimulation is widely used in rehabilitation to prevent muscle weakness and to assist the functional recovery of neural deficits. Its application is however limited by the rapid development of muscle fatigue due to the non-physiological motor unit (MU) recruitment. This issue can be mitigated by interleaving muscle belly (mStim) and nerve stimulation (nStim) to distribute the temporal recruitment among different MU groups. To be effective, this approach requires the two stimulation modalities to activate minimally-overlapped groups of MUs. In this manuscript, we investigated spatial differences between mStim and nStim MU recruitment through the study of architectural changes of superficial and deep compartments of tibialis anterior (TA). We used ultrasound imaging to measure variations in muscle thickness, pennation angle, and fiber length during mStim, nStim, and voluntary (Vol) contractions at 15% and 25% of the maximal force. For both contraction levels, architectural changes induced by nStim in the deep and superficial compartments were similar to those observed during Vol. Instead, during mStim superficial fascicles underwent a greater change compared to those observed during nStim and Vol, both in absolute magnitude and in their relative differences between compartments. These observations suggest that nStim results in a distributed MU recruitment over the entire muscle volume, similarly to Vol, whereas mStim preferentially activates the superficial muscle layer. The diversity between spatial recruitment of nStim and mStim suggests the involvement of different MU populations, which justifies strategies based on interleaved nerve/muscle stimulation to reduce muscle fatigue during electrically-induced contractions of TA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.