We have previously reported initial clinical feasibility with our small diameter tissue engineered blood vessel (TEBV). Here we present in vitro results of the mechanical properties of the TEBVs of the first 25 patients enrolled in an arterio-venous (A-V) shunt safety trial, and compare these properties with those of risk-matched human vein and artery. TEBV average burst pressures (3,490 +/− 892 mmHg, n=230) were higher than native saphenous vein (SV) (1,599 +/− 877 mmHg, n=7), and not significantly different than native internal mammary artery (IMA) (3,196 +/− 1,264 mmHg, n=16). Suture retention strength for the TEBVs (152 +/− 50 gmf) was also not significantly different than IMA (138 +/− 50 gmf). Compliance for the TEBVs prior to implantation (3.4 +/− 1.6 %/100 mmHg) was lower than IMA (11.5 +/− 3.9 %/100 mmHg). By 6 months post-implant, the TEBV compliance (8.8 +/− 4.2 %/100 mmHg, n=5) had increased to values comparable to IMA, and showed no evidence of dilation or aneurysm formation. With clinical time points beyond 21 months as an A-V shunt without intervention, the mechanical tests and subsequent lot release criteria reported here would seem appropriate minimum standards for clinical use of tissue engineered vessels.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Despite widespread hype and significant investment through the late 1980s and 1990s, cell-based therapeutics have largely failed from both a clinical and financial perspective. While the early pioneers were able to create clinically efficacious products, small margins coupled with small initial indications made it impossible to produce a reasonable return on the huge initial investments that had been made to support widespread research activities. Even as US FDA clearance opened up larger markets, investor interest waned, and the crown jewels of cell-based therapeutics went bankrupt or were rescued by corporate bailout. Despite the hard lessons learned from these pioneering companies, many of today's regenerative medicine companies are supporting nearly identical strategies. It remains to be seen whether or not our proposed tenets for investment and commercialization strategy yield an economic success or whether the original model can produce a return on investment sufficient to justify the large up-front investments. Irrespective of which approach yields a success, it is critically important that more of the second-generation products establish profitability if the field is to enjoy continued investment from both public and private sectors.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract