The hemodynamic profiles clearly define specific hemodynamic mechanisms of cardiac power reduction and/or vasodilatation as underlying intradialytic hypotensive episodes. A reduction in cardiac power (reduction of both blood pressure and cardiac output) could be the result of preload reduction due to a high ultrafiltration rate with not enough refilling or low target weight. A reduction in peripheral resistance (reduction in blood pressure and increase in cardiac output) could be the result of relative vasodilatation as arteries do not contract to compensate for volume reduction due to autonomous dysfunction. As both phenomena are independent, they may appear at the same time. Based on these results, a reduction of ultrafiltration rate and an increase in target weight to improve preload or immediate therapeutic actions to increase peripheral resistance are rational measures that could be taken to maintain blood pressure and prevent hypotensive ischemic complications in dialysis patients.

Background Intradialytic blood pressure (BP) measurement is currently the main parameter used for monitoring hemodynamics during hemodialysis (HD). Since BP is dependent on cardiac output and total peripheral resistance, knowledge of these parameters throughout the HD treatment would potentially be valuable. Methods The use of a novel non-invasive monitoring system for profiling hemodynamic response patterns during HD was explored: a whole-body bio-impedance system was used to assess cardiac index (CI), total peripheral resistance index (TPRI), cardiac power index (CPI) among other parameters in chronic HD patients from 4 medical centers. Measurements were made pre, during and post dialysis. Patients were grouped into 5 hemodynamic profiles based on their main hemodynamic response during dialysis i.e. high TPRI; high CPI; low CPI; low TPRI and those with normal hemodynamics. Comparisons were made between the groups for baseline characteristics and 1-year mortality. Results In 144 patients with mean age of 67.3 ± 12.1 years pre-dialysis hemodynamic measurements were within normal limits in 35.4% but only 6.9% overall remained hemodynamically stable during dialysis. Intradialytic BP decreased in 65 (45.1%) in whom, low CPI (47 (72.3%)) and low TPRI (18 (27.7%) were recorded. At 1-year follow-up, mortality rates were highest in patients with low CPI (23.4%) and low TPRI (22.2%). Conclusions Non-invasive assessment of patients’ response to HD provides relevant hemodynamic information that exceeds that provided by currently used BP measurements. Use of these online analyses could potentially improve the safety and performance standards of dialysis by guiding appropriate interventions, particularly in responding to hypertension and hypotension. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12882-019-1542-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.