Ferdinand de Saussure's researches about anagrams conducted between 1906 and 1909 and published by Jean Starobinski at the end of the 60's promoted very different debates on language studies. Some debates pointed out the dichotomy "Saussure of the CGL (Course in General Linguistic)" and "Saussure of the anagrams". The first Saussure made reflections on the linguistic theory field and the second one made it to the poetic field. Due to that dichotomy, there were many linguistic studies on interesting elements about Saussure's works in poetics. Those studies showed an opposition between Saussure's works on poetics and his production on linguistics, but there were also studies that linked both productions. In this sense, it is possible to ask if Saussurean production in the field of poetic has something to do with the concepts and elaborations outlined in CLG, or if it is really a production in opposition to Saussurean linguistic work. By establishing the hypothesis that there is a conection between the concepts of both Saussurean works -Anagrams and CLGinitially we propose to do a full investigation on how Saussure constructed his poetic analysis and the way that he theorized them. The investigation of this theoretical route enable a better comprehension about the approaches Saussure made in his researches, i. e., if Saussure, in his poetics studies, did a diachronic or synchronic approach, or if he did both of them, and even if those studies were about language facts or about speech facts. After that investigation, we focused on how the researchers of Saussurean studies about anagrams analyzed his works and we also payed attention to the tips that these authors have given, in order to understand the relation between Saussurean poetical and linguistic studies and to find the place these researches occupy in modern linguistic foundation. In the last part of this dissertation, we investigate Saussure's main concepts in linguistic field, in order to pursue the possible relations with Saussurean theory elaborations about anagrams. This comparison makes possible to examine the existing links between both Saussurean works. It also allows us to consider if the anagrams are opposed or close to Saussure's thoughts in linguistic field. In fact, the connection between both Saussurean works enable a better comprehension about Ferdinand de Saussure's route in his linguistic studies, considering these works not only as dichotomies or exclusions, but as works that are linked in modern linguistic foundation movement.
RESUMO Desde suas primeiras publicações, na década de 1960, a produção saussureana sobre os anagramas (1906-1909) tem sido cotejada com o Curso de Linguística Geral, ou CLG, publicado em 1916, e com outros manuscritos saussureanos. Nesse artigo, o objetivo é analisar dois conceitos abordados nessas produções, visando caracterizar suas semelhanças: o de analogia, com base nas Três Conferências de 1891 e no CLG, e o de hipograma, com base na produção sobre os anagramas. Veremos que, embora esses conceitos estejam inseridos em produções distintas, com pontos de vista diferentes, eles não deixam de apresentar mais semelhanças do que oposições.
Costa, pelo incentivo e pela sempre abertura para o diálogo. Aos colegas de trabalho, Adélia Gonçalves Soares, Ednamar Ferreira Rosa Germano e Renato Bernardo da Silva, pelos constantes apoios.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.