Attitudes toward interprofessional education are positive overall, but inferences about its key elements are hard to draw. Studies with qualitative strands examining interprofessional education’s key elements (communication, collaboration/teamwork, learning in practice, and understanding of roles) are especially needed. This mixed quantitative/qualitative standardized patient simulation involved 10 family nurse practitioner and 10 medical students. Both cohorts expressed improved teamwork confidence but were concerned about the complexity of teamwork and pressures on communication. At the complexity/communication nexus, nurse practitioner students thought interprofessional trust and equality were key; medical students saw the importance of strategizing multiple professional perspectives.
BACKGROUND:
Physician communication and interpersonal skills (CIS) are increasingly recognized as important to patient care and patient satisfaction. To enhance our medical students' competence in this area, a 2-hour workshop was developed.
METHODS:
Over two consecutive days, third year medical students participated in a 2 hours workshop on interpersonal and communication skills (40-minute lecture, 80-minute standardized patient [SP] encounters). Lecture content was identical during the 2 days with the exception of two slides relating to empathy: on day 1, the empathy queries and statements were described generally with one example of each, whereas on day 2, five examples of specific questions and statements of empathy were provided. After the lecture, participants were directed to predetermined groups of four students to one SP. Each student was assigned a different patient scenario, and allowed 10 minutes to elicit a history. Standardized CIS assessment forms were filled out by the student interviewer (self-assessment), the other students in the group (peer assessment), and the SP. feedback was given after each students' encounter with the SP within their group.
RESULTS:
A total of 237 students consented to participate in the study. The demographics for day 1 and day 2 students were similar. Day 2 students scored better on the standardized patient CIS average cumulative scores (32.0±5.4 versus 28.3±6.2, P<.001), pass rate (78.0% versus 46.5%, P<.001), and proportion attaining exemplary status (27.6% versus 9.6%, P<.01). There were no differences in mean SP rated CIS scores within the day 1 subgroups or day 2 subgroups.
DISCUSSION:
Explicit and multiple examples of empathy queries and statements may be a key curricular component for teaching medical students and leads to improved communication and empathy scores.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.