Objective: Evaluates which radiographic parameters of the sagittal and spinopelvic balance influence the clinical and functional outcomes of a sample of patients undergoing spinal fusion. Methods: We studied 32 patients who underwent spinal fusion. Radiographs of the total spine were obtained from all patients. The clinical and functional parameters studied were analysis of pain by visual analogic scale (VAS) and Oswestry and SRS-30 questionnaires. We analyzed the correlation between the clinical and functional parameters and radiographic parameters of the sagittal and spinopelvic balance. Results: There was no significant correlation between parameters pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL) and difference between PI and LL (PI-LL) and clinical parameters (p > 0.05 and r <0.2). Significant correlation were identified only between Sagittal Vertical Axis (SVA) and Satisfaction with Treatment domain of SRS-30 (r = 0.402 e p = 0.023) and between thoracic kyphosis (TK) and the total SRS-30 (r = 0.419 and p = 0.017). Conclusions: According to the study results, it was not possible to precisely characterize the role of the parameters of the sagittal and spinopelvic balance in the post-operative analysis of the clinical outcome of spinal fusion. There was a significant correlation only between SVA and the Satisfaction with Treatment domain of SRS-30 and between TK and total SRS-30.Keywords: Arthrodesis; Spine; Postural balance; Lordosis; Low back pain; Kyphosis. RESUMO os parâmetros incidência pélvica (IP), versão pélvica (VP), lordose lombar (LL) e diferença entre IP e LL (IP-LL) e os parâmetros clínicos (p > 0,05 e r < 0,2). Houve correlação significante apenas entre o eixo vertical sagital (EVS) e o domínio Satisfação com o Tratamento do SRS-30 (r = 0,402 e p = 0,023) e entre a cifose torácica (CT) e o SRS-30 total (r = 0,419 e p = 0,017). Conclusões: Pelos resultados do estudo, não foi possível caracterizar precisamente o papel dos parâmetros do equilíbrio sagital e espinopélvico na análise do resultado clínico pós-operatório da artrodese da coluna vertebral. Houve correlação significante apenas entre o EVS e o domínio Satisfação com o Tratamento do SRS-30 e entre a CT e o SRS

Objective:To correlate obesity with radiographic parameters of spinal and spinopelvic balance in patients undergoing spinal arthrodesis, and to correlate obesity with clinical outcome of these patients.Methods:Observational retrospective study including patients who underwent spinal arthrodesis, with minimum follow-up period of three months. We measured waist circumference, as well as height and weight to calculate body mass index (BMI) and obtained radiographs of the total column. The clinical parameters studied were pain by visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oswestry questionnaire (ODI). Obesity correlated with radiographic parameters of the sagittal and spinopelvic balance and postoperative clinical parameters.Results:32 patients were analyzed. The higher the BMI, the greater the value of VAS found, but without statistical significance (p=0.83). There was also no correlation between BMI and the ODI questionnaire. Analyzing the abdominal circumference, there was no correlation between the VAS and ODI. There was no correlation between BMI or waist circumference and the radiographic parameters of global spinopelvic sagittal alignment. Regarding the postoperative results, there was no correlation between the mean BMI and waist circumference and the postoperative results for ODI and VAS (p=0.75 and p=0.7, respectively).Conclusions:The clinical outcomes of patients who undergone spinal fusion were not affected by the BMI and waist circumference. Also, there was no correlation between radiographic parameters of spinal and spinopelvic sagittal balance with obesity in patients previously treated with arthrodesis of the spine.