OBJECTIVEThe prognostic importance of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), the gold standard measure of aortic stiffness, has been scarcely investigated in type 2 diabetes and never after full adjustment for potential confounders. The aim was to evaluate the prognostic impact of carotid-femoral PWV for cardiovascular morbidity and all-cause mortality in a cohort of 565 high-risk type 2 diabetic patients.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSClinical, laboratory, ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring, and carotid-femoral PWV data were obtained at baseline. The primary end points were a composite of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Multiple Cox survival analysis was used to assess the associations between carotid-femoral PWV, as a continuous variable and categorized at 10 m/s, and the end points.RESULTSAfter a median follow-up of 5.75 years, 88 total cardiovascular events and 72 all-cause deaths occurred. After adjustments for potential cardiovascular risk factors, including micro- and macrovascular complications, ambulatory BP, and metabolic control, carotid-femoral PWV was predictive of the composite end point but not of all-cause mortality both as a continuous variable (hazard ratio 1.13 [95% CI 1.03–1.23], P = 0.009 for increments of 1 m/s) and as categorized at 10 m/s (1.92 [1.16–3.18], P = 0.012). On sensitivity analysis, carotid-femoral PWV was a better predictor of cardiovascular events in younger patients (<65 years), in those with microvascular complications, and in those with poorer glycemic control (HbA1c ≥7.5% [58.5 mmol/mol]).CONCLUSIONSCarotid-femoral PWV provides cardiovascular risk prediction independent of standard risk factors, glycemic control, and ambulatory BPs and improves cardiovascular risk stratification in high-risk type 2 diabetes.

No abstract

Aims/hypothesis Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a chronic microvascular complication that is strongly associated with poor glycaemic control and also with a worse prognosis. We aimed to evaluate the predictors of the development and progression of DPN in a cohort of high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods In a prospective study, 477 patients with type 2 diabetes were clinically assessed for the presence of DPN at baseline and after a median follow-up of 6.2 years (range 2-10 years). Clinical laboratory data were obtained at study entry and throughout the follow-up. Aortic stiffness was assessed by the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) at baseline. Multivariate Poisson regression analysis was used to examine independent predictors of the development/progression of DPN. Results At baseline, 135 patients (28%) had DPN, and during follow-up 97 patients (20%) had either a new development or a worsening of DPN. Patients who showed a development or progression of DPN were taller and had a longer duration of diabetes, a greater prevalence of other microvascular complications and hypertension, greater aortic stiffness and poorer glycaemic control than patients who did not have new or progressive neuropathy. After adjustments for the baseline prevalence of DPN, the patient's age and sex, and the time interval between DPN assessments; an increased aortic stiffness (cf-PWV >10 m/s) were predictive of new/progressive DPN (incidence rate ratio 2.04, 95% CI 1.28, 3.23; p=0.002).Other independent predictors were the mean first-year HbA 1c level ( p=0.05), nephropathy ( p=0.006), arterial hypertension ( p=0.06) and height ( p=0.03). Conclusions/interpretation Increased aortic stiffness at baseline predicts the future development or progression of peripheral neuropathy, independent of diabetic metabolic control, suggesting a physiopathological link between macrovascular and microvascular abnormalities in type 2 diabetes.