The article presents the results of a preliminary analysis focused on immigration discourses in Czech social media (including selected on-line daily newspapers). The aim of the research was to provide a sociological understanding of the attitudes of the Czechs to the current refugee crisis and to explore the ways how various forms of public opinions have been articulated by Czech social media. Therefore, the text does not deal directly with analysis of immigration policies but with discourses surrounding, producing and forming the current events. The author argues that, at a high level of generalization, it is feasible to analytically distinguish three media/public discourses in the Czech debate on immigration: dominant anti-immigrant discourse, defensive pro-immigrant discourse, and rational-expert discourse.
Makale, (çevrimiçi günlük gazeteler de dahil olmak üzere) Türk ve Çek çevrimiçi medyasını karşılaştırarak göçmen sağlığına ilişkin söylemlere odaklanan bir çözümlemenin sonuçlarını sunmaktadır. Araştırmanın amacı, farklı göç seviyesine sahip iki ülke arasındaki farklılıklar ve benzerliklerle birlikte, Türk ve Çek çevrimiçi medyasında göçmen ve sağlığına ilişkin konuların nasıl ele alındığının ve ne tür söylemlerle temsil edildiğinin araştırılarak ülkelerin büyüklüğü ve nüfuslarına ilişkin sosyolojik bir kavrayış sağlamaktır. Bu nedenle metin, doğrudan göçmenlere ilişkin sağlık politikalarının analizinden ziyade güncel olayları kapsayan, üreten ve diyalektik olarak dönüştürürken dönüşen söylemlerle ilgilidir. Yazar, Türkçe ve Çekçe yazılı çevrimiçi medyada yer alan birtakım medya söylemlerinin, yüksek bir genelleme söz konusu olduğunda, analitik olarak ayırt edilmesinin mümkün olduğunu ileri sürmektedir. ABSTRACT IN ENGLISH Media Discourse on Migrants during the Covid-19 Outbreak: Comparison of Turkish and Czech Written Online Media The article presents the results of analysis focused on discourses related to the health of migrants amidst the Coronavirus outbreak comparing Turkish online media with Czech online media (including selected on-line daily newspapers). The aim of the research is to provide a sociological understanding of the differences and similarities between the two countries with a differing immigration levels, and the size of their territories and populations by exploring the ways how migrants and their health have been referred to and by what discourses they were represented by in Turkish and Czech electronic (online) media. Therefore, the text does not deal directly with the analysis of health policies regarding migrants but with discourses surrounding, producing, and dialectically being formed by and forming the current events. The author argues that, at a high level of generalization, it is feasible to analytically distinguish several media discourses in Turkish and Czech written electronic media.
Pohraniční historický mikroregion Hlučínsko se ve 20. století stal předmětem politických sporů mezi Československem a Německem, což výrazně ovlivnilo zejména meziválečnou generaci Hlučíňanů a mělo dopady na následující dvě generace. Příspěvek je zaměřen na proměny ve formování sociálních identit mezi třemi generacemi hlučínských autochtonů za využití perspektivy historické generace. Klíčovým prvkem se tak stává životní zkušenost a její ukotvení v historické paměti. Zdrojem dat pro studii jsou biograficko-narativní rozhovory, psané autobiografie i reflexe v dílech regionálních autorů. Proměna je zachycena pomocí zkoumání mezigeneračních vazeb mezi jednotlivými příslušníky několika hlučínských rodin, neboť v tomto prostoru lze dobře pozorovat předávání, vyjednávání a reflexi zkušeností. A právě z komunikace mezi starší věkovou generací a generacemi mladšími a pod vlivem dějinných zvratů dochází k sebeuvědomění, jež může vést k formování historické generace.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.