Accidental exposure to hazelnut or peanut constitutes a real threat to the health of allergic consumers. Correct information regarding food product ingredients is of paramount importance for the consumer, thereby reducing exposure to food allergens. In this study, 569 cookies and chocolates on the European market were purchased. All products were analysed to determine peanut and hazelnut content, allowing a comparison of the analytical results with information provided on the product label. Compared to cookies, chocolates are more likely to contain undeclared allergens, while, in both food categories, hazelnut traces were detected at higher frequencies than peanut. The presence of a precautionary label was found to be related to a higher frequency of positive test results. The majority of chocolates carrying a precautionary label tested positive for hazelnut, whereas peanut traces were not be detected in 75% of the cookies carrying a precautionary label.
Peanut allergic reactions can result from the ingestion of even very small quantities of peanut and represent a severe threat to the health of sensitised individuals. The detection of peanut traces in food products is therefore of prime importance. Peanut traces which can be (unintentionally) present in food products have usually undergone one or more processing steps like roasting and baking. Therefore, methods designed to detect such traces have to be capable of detecting heat-treated peanuts. Commonly used methodologies designed to detect peanut traces in food products are enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) that detect peanut-specific proteins, and polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR)-based methods targeting peanut-specific DNA. A comparative analysis of such methods was performed and the impact of heat treatment on peanut kernels as well as the impact on a peanut-containing food matrix are investigated. Our results show that heat treatments have a detrimental effect on the detection of peanut with either type of method and that both types of methods are affected in a similar manner.
The results of an inter-laboratory study with five commercially available peanut ELISA test kits to detect and quantify peanut residues in two food matrices (biscuit and dark chocolate) at four different concentrations (0-10 mg peanut kg(-1) matrix corresponding to about 0-2.5 mg peanut protein kg(-1) matrix) are reported. In general the five ELISA test kits evaluated could detect peanut protein in the two food matrices. In three cases, the study challenged the test kits beyond their intended use for quantification below the manufacturers' defined cut-off limits. Generally, all five ELISA test kits performed well in the concentration range 5-10 mg kg(-1) rather than in the low concentration range (2.0 or 2.5 mg kg(-1)). The variation in the found recoveries of peanut between the different test kits had a spread of 44-191% across all concentrations. The quantification characteristics between test kits differed significantly at the very low mg kg(-1) level. Two test kits performed well even at concentrations below 5 mg kg(-1) with reproducibilities of 27-36% for biscuits and 45-57% for chocolate.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.