The basic proteinase inhibitor from bovine organs, aprotinin, was first identified in 1930 and its effect on enzyme and other biological systems has since been extensively studied. Aprotinin can only be administered intravenously and has a half-life of about 2 hours. Its administration at the start of cardiopulmonary bypass surgery appears to reduce blood loss and to protect against global myocardial ischaemia. Similarly, a smaller infarct size seems to result from early administration of aprotinin within the first hour after myocardial infarction, though further studies are needed to confirm this effect. A combination of aprotinin with tranexamic acid may be effective in preventing or delaying rebleeding after rupture of an intracerebral aneurysm; the addition of aprotinin seems to decrease the incidence of delayed cerebral vasospasm and ischaemic complications which are sometimes noted when tranexamic acid alone is used. Aprotinin is also effective as adjuvant treatment in traumatic haemorrhagic shock. The recommended loading dose is 15,000 to 20,000 KIU/kg bodyweight administered as a short intravenous infusion, followed by 50,000 KIU/hour by continuous infusion. Side effects of aprotinin are very rare. Epsilon-Aminocaproic acid (EACA), p-aminomethylbenzoic acid (PAMBA) and tranexamic acid are synthetic antifibrinolytic amino acids. Saturation of the lysine binding sites of plasminogen with these inhibitors displaces plasminogen from the fibrin surface. On a molar basis tranexamic acid is at least 7 times more potent that epsilon-aminocaproic acid and twice as potent as p-aminomethylbenzoic acid. All 3 compounds are readily absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and excreted in active form in the urine. The plasma half-life of tranexamic acid is about 80 minutes. The main indications for tranexamic acid are the prevention of excessive bleeding after tonsillectomy, prostatic surgery, and cervical conisation, and primary and IUD-induced menorrhagia. It is possible that gastric and intestinal bleeding can also be reduced as well as recurrent epistaxis. Tranexamic acid could also be useful after ocular trauma. The value of fibrinolysis inhibitors in the prevention of bleeding after tooth extraction in patients with haemophilia is well documented, as is the treatment of hereditary angioneurotic oedema. The usual dose of tranexamic acid is 0.5 to 1g (10 to 15 mg/kg bodyweight) given intravenously 2 to 3 times daily, or 1 to 1.5 g orally 3 to 4 times daily. This dose needs to be reduced in patients with renal insufficiency. The main side effects of tranexamic acid are nausea or diarrhoea.
Eight centers participated in a study in which intrapulmonary and intravenous administration of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) were compared in 34 patients with acute massive pulmonary embolism. All patients received intravenous heparin in a bolus of 5000 IU followed by 1000 LU/hr. After 50 mg rt-PA given over 2 hr the severity of embolism, determined from pulmonary angiograms, declined by 12% in the intrapulmonary drug group (p < .005) and 15% in the intravenous drug group (p < .005); mean pulmonary arterial pressure fell from 31 7 to 22 + 6 mm Hg (p < .005) and from 31 + 12 to 21 ± 9 mm Hg (p < .005) in the respective groups. After a further 50 mg given over 5 hr (22 patients), the angiographically determined severity of embolism had decreased by 38% from baseline in the intrapulmonary drug group and by 38% in the intravenous drug group. The mean pulmonary arterial pressure further declined to 18 ± 7 and 12 ± 5 mm Hg in the respective groups. Fibrinogen levels dropped to 48% of baseline after 50 mg and to 36% of baseline after 100 mg rt-PA. Some degree of bleeding at puncture and/or operation sites was noted in 16 patients, including four who required a transfusion of two or more units of blood and had been operated on an average of 7.5 days (range 2 to 13) before thrombolytic treatment was started. In seven other patients thrombolytic treatment was initiated an average of 8.5 days (range 3 to 15) after surgery and only very minor or no bleeding was observed. This trial indicates that the intrapulmonary infusion of rt-PA does not offer a significant benefit over the intravenous route and suggests that a prolonged infusion of rt-PA over 7 hr (100 mg) is superior to a single infusion of 50 mg over 2 hr. Circulation 77, No. 2, 353-360, 1988. A NUMBER of studies 1-13 has demonstrated the accelerated resolution of pulmonary emboli that can be obtained with thrombolytic therapy and in 1980 a National Institutes of Health consensus conference14 concluded that". . ideal therapy for pulmonary embolism requires either the surgical removal or lysis of the thrombus or embolus." Despite the established superiority of thrombolytic over heparin treatment for hemodynamically compromised patients with massive pulmonary embolism, such therapy has not been universally adopted and there remains a significant group of patients to whom thrombolytic agents are not given. Such patients include those in whom the risk of bleeding induced by streptokinase or urokinase is thought to outweigh the benefit, particularly postsurgical patients,
Twelve centers participated in a double-blind study in which 63 patients with angiographically documented acute massive pulmonary embolism were randomly assigned to treatment with either urokinase (4,400 U/kg as an intravenous bolus infusion, then 4,400 U/kg per h over 12 h; n = 29) or alteplase (10 mg as an intravenous bolus infusion, then 90 mg over 2 h) followed by heparin (n = 34). The primary objective was to compare the resolution of pulmonary embolism as judged by the change in total pulmonary resistance over the initial 2 h. Further objectives were to evaluate the changes in total pulmonary resistance over the next 10 h and the degree of angiographic resolution at 12 to 18 h. At 2 h, total pulmonary resistance decreased by 18 +/- 22% in the urokinase group and by 36 +/- 17% in the alteplase group (p = 0.0009). Continuous monitoring of pulmonary artery mean pressure, cardiac index and total pulmonary resistance revealed that these variables improved faster in the alteplase group, with consistently significant intergroup differences from 30 min up to 3 to 4 h. After 12 h, the decrease in total pulmonary resistance was 53 +/- 19% in the urokinase group compared with 48 +/- 17% in the alteplase group and the reduction in the angiographic severity score was 30 +/- 25% compared with 24 +/- 18%, respectively, with no significant intergroup differences. Bleeding was equally frequent in the two treatment groups, except that more urokinase-treated patients experienced hematomas at puncture sites.
A randomised trial of 367 patients with acute myocardial infarction was performed to determine whether an invasive strategy combining thrombolysis with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rTPA), heparin, and acetylsalicylic acid, and immediate percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) would be superior to a noninvasive strategy with the same medical treatment but without immediate angiography and PTCA. Intravenous infusion of 100 mg rTPA was started within 5 h after onset of symptoms (median 156 min). Angiography was performed 6-165 min later in 180 out of 183 patients allocated to the invasive strategy; 184 patients were allocated to the non-invasive strategy. Immediate PTCA reduced the percentage stenosis of the infarct-related segment, but this was offset by a high rate of transient (16%) and sustained (7%) reocclusion during the procedure and recurrent ischaemia during the first 24 h (17%). The clinical course was more favourable after non-invasive therapy, with a lower incidence of recurrent ischaemia within 24 h (3%), bleeding complications, hypotension, and ventricular fibrillation. Mortality at 14 days was lower in patients allocated to non-invasive treatment (3%) than in the group allocated to invasive treatment (7%). No difference between the treatment groups was observed in infarct size estimated from myocardial release of alpha-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase or in left ventricular ejection fraction after 10-22 days. Since immediate PTCA does not provide additional benefit there seems to be no need for immediate angiography and PTCA in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with rTPA.
Standard unfractionated heparin is a mixture of mucopolysaccharide chains of various length that may vary from 5000 to 30,000 daltons. Heparin is only effective as an anticoagulant in the presence of a plasma protein termed antithrombin III, with which it forms a complex. High- and low-affinity heparin are 2 types that readily bind or do not bind, respectively, to antithrombin III. The pharmacokinetics of unfractionated heparin are compatible with a model based on the combination of a saturable and a linear mechanism. The primary indication for intravenous infusion of conventional heparin is to prevent extension of an established arterial, venous or intracardiac thrombus. The average requirement is 400 U/kg/24h. Subcutaneous administration of 5000U of concentrated unfractionated heparin, administered every 8 or 12 hours, is effective and safe in the prevention of postoperative venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in patients at medium thrombotic risk. Adequate prophylaxis is also obtained in patients at high thrombotic risk if 5000U of heparin combined with 0.5mg dihydroergotamine is given subcutaneously 3 times daily, or by monitoring the 3 subcutaneous doses of heparin in order to maintain an adjusted activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) of around 50 to 70 seconds. Low molecular weight heparins have been produced by a variety of techniques and their molecular weights range from 3000 to 9000 daltons. These preparations have a ratio of anti-factor Xa activity to anti-factor IIa activity of about 4, while the ratio for unfractionated heparin is 1. After intravenous administration of low molecular weight heparin, the half-life of the anti-factor Xa activity is considerably longer than for unfractionated heparin, while the anti-factor IIa half-lives are similar. In contrast to unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparin is completely absorbed after subcutaneous administration and its biological half-life is almost twice as long. In spite of certain differences with regard to the ratio between factor Xa and IIa inhibition, the various low molecular weight preparations show a rather similar absorption pattern. The bioavailability of all low molecular weight heparin fractions is substantially higher than that of unfractionated heparin, which renders their use more simple. Low molecular weight heparins less readily enhance platelet aggregation although there is no evidence that low molecular weight heparins are less antigenic or that they do not interact with platelet IgGFc receptor. A lower bleeding incidence for equivalent antithrombotic efficacy of fractionated heparins when compared to unfractionated heparins has yet to be established in humans.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
A B S T R A C T A simple venous thrombosis model in rabbits was used for the quantitative evaluation of the thrombolytic effect of human extrinsic (tissue-type) plasminogen activator as compared with urokinase.A thrombus was formed in an isolated segment of the jugular vein from a mixture of 125I-labeled fibrinogen, whole rabbit blood, and thrombin. In order to immobilize the thrombus during lysis, it was formed around a woolen thread introduced longitudinally in the lumen of the vein. Thrombotic extension of the clot was prevented by subcutaneous injection of heparin. The extent of thrombolysis was measured as the difference between the radioactivity introduced in the clot and that recovered in the vein segment at the end of the experiment. In control animals the extent of thrombolysis was 5.6±1.4% (n = 5) after 6 h, 14.5±1.7% (n = 10) after 30 h, 16.0±1.5% (n = 11) after 78 h, and 48.1±2.7% (n = 10) after 174 h (mean±SEM).Extrinsic (tissue-type) plasminogen activator, highly purified from the culture fluid of a human melanoma cell line, was administered systemically or locally over a time period of 4 h and the percent thrombolysis measured 2 h after the end of the infusion. One-and two-chain extrinsic plasminogen activator had very similar thrombolytic potency. Systemic infusion resulted in a dose-dependent degree of thrombolysis. The activator-induced thrombolysis, after infusion of 100,000 IU (n1 mg protein), was -75% for fresh clots, 35% for 1-d-old clots, 30% for 3-d-old clots, and 50% for 7-d-old clots. The thrombolytic activity of urokinase was more than five times lower than that of extrinsic plasminogen activator: Infusion of 500,000 IU resulted in -40% lysis of fresh clots and 25% of 1-3-d-old clots, while 7-d-old clots appeared to have become resistent to urokinase. Local infusion resulted in a 5-10 times higher thrombolytic effect of both extrinsic plasminogen activator and urokinase.Thrombolysis with extrinsic plasminogen activator was not associated with systemic activation of the fibrinolytic system as evidenced by unaltered plasma levels of fibrinogen, plasminogen, and a2-antiplasmin.Systemic infusion of urokinase resulted in significant thrombolysis only at doses that were associated with disseminated plasminogen activation. Local infusion of urokinase required a 5-10-fold higher dose than extrinsic plasminogen activator to obtain a similar degree of thrombolysis, which also occurred in the absence of systemic activation of the fibrinolytic system. It is concluded that the extent of thrombolysis by extrinsic plasminogen activator is mainly determined by the dose of activator and its delivery in the vicinity of the thrombus and much less by the age of the thrombus or the molecular form of the activator. Extrinsic plasminogen activator appears to be superior to urokinase because of its higher (5-10-fold) specific thrombolytic activity and the absence of systemic activation of the fibrinolytic system, which results in defibrinogenation and a bleeding tendency. 368J. Clin. Invest.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.