Introns have typically been discovered in an ad hoc fashion: introns are found as a gene is characterized for other reasons. As complete eukaryotic genome sequences become available, better methods for predicting RNA processing signals in raw sequence will be necessary in order to discover genes and predict their expression. Here we present a catalog of 228 yeast introns, arrived at through a combination of bioinformatic and molecular analysis. Introns annotated in the Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) were evaluated, questionable introns were removed after failing a test for splicing in vivo, and known introns absent from the SGD annotation were added. A novel branchpoint sequence, AAUUAAC, was identified within an annotated intron that lacks a six-of-seven match to the highly conserved branchpoint consensus UACUAAC. Analysis of the database corroborates many conclusions about pre-mRNA substrate requirements for splicing derived from experimental studies, but indicates that splicing in yeast may not be as rigidly determined by splice-site conservation as had previously been thought. Using this database and a molecular technique that directly displays the lariat intron products of spliced transcripts (intron display), we suggest that the current set of 228 introns is still not complete, and that additional intron-containing genes remain to be discovered in yeast. The database can be accessed at http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/research/compbio/yeast_ introns.html.

Correct identification of all introns is necessary to discern the protein-coding potential of a eukaryotic genome. The existence of most of the spliceosomal introns predicted in the genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae remains unsupported by molecular evidence. We tested the intron predictions for 87 introns predicted to be present in non-ribosomal protein genes, more than a third of all known or suspected introns in the yeast genome. Evidence supporting 61 of these predictions was obtained, 20 predicted intron sequences were not spliced and six predictions identified an intron-containing region but failed to specify the correct splice sites, yielding a successful prediction rate of <80%. Alternative splicing has not been previously described for this organism, and we identified two genes (YKL186C/ MTR2 and YML034W) which encode alternatively spliced mRNAs; YKL186C/ MTR2 produces at least five different spliced mRNAs. One gene (YGR225W/ SPO70 ) has an intron whose removal is activated during meiosis under control of the MER1 gene. We found eight new introns, suggesting that numerous introns still remain to be discovered. The results show that correct prediction of introns remains a significant barrier to understanding the structure, function and coding capacity of eukaryotic genomes, even in a supposedly simple system like yeast.

Three introns whose splicing is activated during meiosis in S. cerevisiae contain a Mer1p-dependent splicing enhancer. The enhancer can impose Mer1p-activated splicing upon the constitutively spliced actin intron provided the basal splicing efficiency of actin is first reduced. Of several nonessential splicing factors tested, only the U1 snRNP protein Nam8p is indispensable for Mer1 p-activated splicing. We show that Mer1p associates with the U1 snRNP even in the absence of Nam8p or pre-mRNA. This work defines a yeast splicing enhancer and shows that constitutively expressed and cell type-specific factors combine to regulate splicing of a specific subset of pre-mRNAs including SPO70, MER2, and MER3.

The coat proteins of the RNA bacteriophages Q␤ and MS2 are specific RNA binding proteins. Although they possess common tertiary structures, they bind different RNA stem loops and thus provide useful models of specific protein-RNA recognition. Although the RNA-binding site of MS2 coat protein has been extensively characterized previously, little is known about Q␤. Here we describe the isolation of mutants that define the RNAbinding site of Q␤ coat protein, showing that, as with MS2, it resides on the surface of a large ␤-sheet. Mutations are also described that convert Q␤ coat protein to the RNA binding specificity of MS2. The results of these and other studies indicate that, although they bind different RNAs, the binding sites of the two coat proteins are sufficiently similar that each is easily converted by mutation to the RNA binding specificity of the other.The coat proteins of the RNA bacteriophages play dual roles in the viral life cycle. In addition to serving as the major structural proteins of the virus particles, they act as translational repressors of viral replicase synthesis. This latter function is the result of coat protein interaction with an RNA stem loop which contains the replicase ribosome-binding site. The coat protein of bacteriophage MS2 is the most intensively studied of the RNA phage coat proteins. Its binding target on viral RNA has been thoroughly characterized (1), coat protein itself has been subjected to detailed genetic analysis of its RNA binding function (2-6), and x-ray structures of the coat protein in both the free and RNA-bound forms are available (7-9). The coat proteins of related phages are less well characterized, but, since some bind different RNAs, they provide opportunities to understand the basis of RNA binding specificity. The RNA binding targets of the coat proteins of MS2 and Q␤ are shown in Fig. 1. The two coat proteins are about 25% identical in amino acid sequence and possess highly similar tertiary structures. Thus they utilize a common structural framework to bind structurally distinct RNAs.We previously reported genetic analyses of the MS2 coat protein RNA-binding site utilizing a two-plasmid system in which coat protein expressed from one plasmid (pCT119) translationally represses synthesis of a replicase-␤-galactosidase fusion protein from the second plasmid (pRZ5). We constructed an equivalent two-plasmid system for Q␤ coat protein in order to similarly dissect its RNA-binding site. Here we describe this system and its application in identifying amino acid residues important for the interaction of Q␤ coat protein with its RNA. We also describe the isolation and characterization of specificity mutations that confer to Q␤ coat protein the ability to bind the MS2 translational operator. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURESPlasmid Constructions-A two-plasmid system suitable for the isolation of MS2 coat mutants with altered translational repressor activities has been previously described in detail (2). In that system coat protein expressed from pCT119 represses the synthesi...

In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Mer1p is expressed only during meiosis, and its expression is linked to the splicing of at least three mRNAs: MER2, MER3, and AMA1. Previous evidence suggests that Mer1p activates splicing by directly recruiting snRNPs or stabilizing intermediate splicing complexes formed on pre-mRNA that contains an intronic Mer1p enhancer element. However, some splicing factors, especially accessory/non-snRNP factors, have critical roles in retaining unspliced pre-mRNAs in the nucleus. We tested if Mer1p may indirectly regulate splicing by preventing the export of pre-mRNAs to the cytoplasm and also demonstrated that a second subunit of the Retention and Splicing (RES) complex, Bud13p, has transcript-specific effects on Mer1p-activated splicing. The results indicated that Mer1p can retain unspliced pre-mRNA in the nucleus; however, nuclear retention could not be uncoupled from splicing activation. In the absence of Mer1p, the AMA1 pre-mRNA is exported to the cytoplasm, translated, but not subjected to nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) despite a premature stop codon in the intron. These data imply that Mer1p can retain pre-mRNAs in the nucleus only by facilitating their interaction with the spliceosome and that two subunits of the RES complex modulate Mer1p function on two of the three Mer1p-dependent introns. The results also support models for cytoplasmic degradation of unspliced pre-mRNAs that fail to assemble into spliceosomes in yeast.