The MSH6 gene is one of the mismatch-repair genes involved in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Three hundred sixteen individuals who were known or suspected to have HNPCC were analyzed for MSH6 germline mutations. For 25 index patients and 8 relatives with MSH6 variants, molecular and clinical features are described. For analysis of microsatellite instability (MSI), the five consensus markers were used. Immunohistochemical analysis of the MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 proteins was performed. Five truncating MSH6 mutations, of which one was detected seven times, were found in 12 index patients, and 10 MSH6 variants with unknown pathogenicity were found in 13 index patients. Fourteen (54%) of 26 colorectal cancers (CRCs) and endometrial cancers showed no, or only weak, MSI. Twelve of 18 tumors of truncating-mutation carriers and 3 of 17 tumors of missense-mutation carriers showed loss of MSH6 staining. Six of the families that we studied fulfilled the original Amsterdam criteria; most families with MSH6, however, were only suspected to have HNPCC. In families that did not fulfill the revised Amsterdam criteria, the prevalence of MSH6 variants is about the same as the prevalence of those in MLH1/MSH2. Endometrial cancer and/or atypical hyperplasia were diagnosed in 8 of 12 female carriers of MSH6 truncating mutations. Most CRCs were localized distally in the colon. Although, molecularly, missense variants are labeled as doubtfully pathogenic, clinical data disclose a great resemblance between missense-variant carriers and truncating-mutation carriers. We conclude that, in all patients suspected to have HNPCC, MSH6-mutation analysis should be considered. Neither MSI nor immunohistochemistry should be a definitive selection criterion for MSH6-mutation analysis.

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) (Amsterdam criteria) is often caused by mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes, and tumors of patients with HNPCC show microsatellite instability (MSI-high phenotype). Germline mutations of MMR genes have rarely been found in families that have HNPCC or suspected HNPCC and that do not show microsatellite instability (MSI-low phenotype). Therefore, an MSI-high phenotype is often used as an inclusion criterion for mutation testing of MMR genes. Correction of base-base mismatches is the major function of MSH6. Since mismatches present with an MSI-low phenotype, we assumed that the phenotype in patients with HNPCC-related tumors might be associated with MSH6 germline mutations. We divided 36 patients with suspected HNPCC into an MSI-low group (n=18) and an MSI-high group (n=18), on the basis of the results of MSI testing. Additionally, three unrelated patients from Amsterdam families with MSI-low tumors were investigated. All patients were screened for MSH2, MLH1, and MSH6 mutations. Four presumably causative MSH6 mutations were detected in the patients (22%) who had suspected HNPCC and MSI-low tumors. Furthermore, we detected one frameshift mutation in one of the three patients with HNPCC and MSI-low tumors. In the MSI-high group, one MSH6 missense mutation was found, but the same patient also had an MLH1 mutation, which may explain the MSI-high phenotype. These results suggest that MSH6 may be involved in a substantial proportion of patients with HNPCC or suspected HNPCC and MSI-low tumors. Our data emphasize that an MSI-low phenotype cannot be considered an exclusion criterion for mutation testing of MMR genes in general.

In 23% of the young endometrial cancer patients with at least one first-degree relative with an HNPCC-related cancer, an MMR gene mutation was detected. Therefore, presence of an HNPCC-related cancer in a first-degree relative seems to be an important selection criterion for mutation analysis. Subsequent immunostaining of MMR proteins will point to the gene(s) that should be analyzed.

No abstract

Background: Patients with early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) or those with multiple tumours associated with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) raise suspicion of the presence of germline DNA mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutations. Aim: To analyse the value of family history, microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis and MMR protein staining in the tumour to predict the presence of an MMR gene mutation in such patients. Methods: In 281 patients diagnosed with CRC before the age of 50 years or with CRC and at least one additional HNPCC-associated cancer, germline mutation analysis in MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 was carried out with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. MSI analysis with five consensus markers and MMR protein staining for MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 were carried out in the tumours. Results: 25 pathogenic mutations (8 in MLH1, 9 in MSH2 and 8 in MSH6) were found. MSI analysis missed three and immunohistochemistry (IHC) missed two mutation carriers. Sensitivities of family history, MSI analysis and IHC for the presence of a mutation were 76%, 82% and 88%, specificities were 64%, 70% and 84%, and positive predictive values were 19%, 23% and 38%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed the highest odds ratio for IHC (38.3, 95% confidence interval 9.0 to 184). Prevalence of pathogenic germline MMR gene mutations in patients with CRC before the age of 50 years was 6% and in those with >2 HNPCC-associated tumours was 22%. In the second group, no mutation carriers were found among the 29 patients who were diagnosed with their first tumour after the age of 60 years. Conclusion: Family history, MSI analysis and IHC are indicative parameters to select patients with CRC for MMR gene mutation analysis. The data show that IHC is the best single selection criterion.

No abstract

Several reports have indicated that the combination of calcipotriol ointment and potent or ultrapotent corticosteroids are more effective and better tolerated, as compared to the monotherapies. The aim of the present study was to find out the effect of combination of calcipotriol ointment once daily and betamethasone dipropionate ointment once daily vs. the effect of twice-daily applications of each of the two treatments as monotherapy during a four-week treatment period. Seven patients with chronic plaque psoriasis were included for treatment with the three treatment schedules. Biopsies were taken before treatment and after four weeks of treatment, and markers for epidermal proliferation (Ki-67) and epidermal differentiation (keratin-10) were studied using a quantitative image analysis, and T-cell subsets in epidermis and dermis (CD4, CD8, CD25, CD45RO, CD45RA, CD94, CD161, and CD2) were studied using immunohistochemical scoring. The most impressive clinical result was reached with the combination. Calcipotriol proved to have a major effect on the proliferation marker Ki-67 and differentiation marker keratin-10, whereas the effect on T-cell subsets was more selective with major reductions of CD45RO(+) and CD8(+) T cells. In contrast, the effect of betamethasone dipropionate on the epidermis was restricted to a normalization of differentiation with a highly significant increase of keratin-10 positive epidermal surface without a significant effect on Ki-67 positive nuclei, and the effect on T-cell subsets was restricted to a reduction of natural killer T-cell receptors designated by CD94 and CD161 in the epidermis. The combination of the two treatments did not affect the proliferation marker Ki-67 and keratinization marker keratin-10, beyond the effect of calcipotriol monotherapy. However, the combination had a profound effect on, virtually, all T-cell subsets, beyond the effect of the monotherapies. It is concluded that the action spectra of calcipotriol and betamethasone on the psoriatic plaque are different and that the combination has effects on T-cell subsets, beyond the addition of the effects of monotherapies.

The predictive value of MLH1 or MSH2 protein expression for the presence of truncating germline mutations was examined in benign and (pre)malignant endometrial samples from 3 patient groups: (I) 10 endometrial cancer patients from hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) families with (n ‫؍‬ 6) or without (n ‫؍‬ 4) a known germline mutation; (II) 15 women from HNPCC families with (n ‫؍‬ 7) or without (n ‫؍‬ 8) a known germline mutation, who underwent endometrial sampling for non-malignant reasons; (III) 38 endometrial cancer patients <50 years of age, without HNPCC family history. Immunostaining for MLH1 and MSH2 was performed on paraffin-embedded sections. In group III, tumor DNA was examined for microsatellite instability (MSI) and MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 mutation analysis was carried out. In 6/6 MLH1/MSH2 mutation carriers with endometrial cancer (group I), concordance was found between protein loss in the tumor and the corresponding mutation. In 3 MLH1 mutation carriers, MLH1 protein loss was also observed in concurrent endometrial hyperplasia. In group II, no protein loss was detected in normal endometrial tissue samples; in 3/4 patients with endometrial hyperplasia, MLH1/MSH2 protein loss was observed. In group III, protein loss was detected in 12/38 patients (9 MLH1, 3 MSH2), while in 3/11 patients with concurrent endometrial hyperplasia protein loss was also observed in the hyperplasia. MSI analysis in group III revealed 26 MSI-low and 12 MSI-high tumors. Mutation analysis in 28/38 patients showed only 1 missense MSH6 and no MLH1 or MSH2 germline mutations. In group III, loss of MLH1/MSH2 protein expression was not related to the presence of MSI or MLH1/MSH2 germline mutations. In conclusion, MLH1 or MSH2 protein loss in HNPCC-related endometrial neoplasia is strongly related to corresponding germline mutations. This relation was not clearly present in young sporadic endometrial cancer patients. Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is an autosomal dominant disorder, clinically defined by the revised Amsterdam criteria. 1 Colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer are the most common malignancies in HNPCC patients. In these patients, the median age at development of colorectal and endometrial cancer is about 44 and 47 years, respectively. 2-4 Most HNPCC cases can be explained by a germline mutation in one of the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. In humans, 5 MMR genes have been associated with HNPCC: MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS1 and PMS2. With current mutation analysis methods, germline mutations can be detected in approximately 60% of HNPCC kindreds, with Ͼ90% of the mutations in MLH1 or MSH2. 5 The dysfunction of the DNA MMR system causes genetic instability, and this instability has been demonstrated in tumors of HNPCC patients as frequent alterations at loci containing short, repetitive sequences, referred to as microsatellite instability (MSI) or replication errors. 5,6 More than 90% of colorectal tumors and about 75% of endometrial tumors in HNPCC mutation carriers show MSI. 7,8 Therefore...