It is widely recognized that microbial disorders are involved in the pathogenesis of many malignant tumors. The oral and intestinal tract are two of the overriding microbial habitats in the human body. Although they are anatomically and physiologically continuous, belonging to the openings at both ends of the digestive tract, the oral and intestinal microbiome do not cross talk with each other due to a variety of reasons, including intestinal microbial colonization resistance and chemical barriers in the upper digestive tract. However, this balance can be upset in certain circumstances, such as disruption of colonization resistance of gut microbes, intestinal inflammation, and disruption of the digestive tract chemical barrier. Evidence is now accruing to suggest that the oral microbiome can colonize the gut, leading to dysregulation of the gut microbes. Furthermore, the oral-gut microbes create an intestinal inflammatory and immunosuppressive microenvironment conducive to tumorigenesis and progression of colorectal cancer (CRC). Here, we review the oral to intestinal microbial transmission and the inflammatory and immunosuppressive microenvironment, induced by oral-gut axis microbes in the gut. A superior comprehension of the contribution of the oral-intestinal microbes to CRC provides new insights into the prevention and treatment of CRC in the future.

Tumor cells undergo epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), however, there is a room of disagreement in role of EMT heterogeneity to colorectal cancer metastasis (mCRC) evolution. To uncover new EMT-related metastasis proteins and pathways, we addressed the EMT status in colorectal cancer liver metastasis patient-derived CTCs to identify proteins that promote their distant metastasis. And then, we performed a comparative proteomic analysis in matched pairs of primary tumor tissues, adjacent mucosa tissues and liver metastatic tissues. By integrative analysis we show that, unstable Epithelial/Mesenchymal (E/M)-type CTCs had the strongest liver metastases formation ability and the proportion of E/M-type CTCs correlated with distant metastases. Using an optimized proteomic workflow including data independent acquisition (DIA) and parallel reaction monitoring (PRM), we identified novel EMT-related protein cluster (GNG2, COL6A1, COL6A2, DCN, COL6A3, LAMB2, TNXB, CAVIN1) and well-described (ERBB2) core protein level changes in EMT-related metastasis progression, and the proteomic data indicate ERBB2, COL6A1 and CAVIN1 are promising EMT-related metastatic biomarker candidates. This study contributes to our understanding of the role that EMT plays in CRC metastasis and identifies heterogeneous EMT phenotypes as a key piece for tumor progression and prognosis. We further propose that therapies targeting this aggressive subset (E/M-type) of CTCs and related protein may be worthy of exploration as potential suppressors of metastatic evolution.

ObjectiveLiver metastasis of colorectal cancer (LMCRC) is a major cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. We can reduce the mortality rate by discerning the risk of liver metastases in patients with colorectal cancer at an early stage. Hence, we combined the use of folate receptor (FR)–labeled circulating tumor cells (FR+CTCs) and the metastasis-related marker, heat shock protein 90 (HSP90), to screen patients with colorectal cancer and explore the prognostic factors of patients with high expression of FR+CTC and HSP90.Patients and methodsA retrospective study of 356 patients with measurable colorectal cancer was performed. Negative enrichment and FR-targeted fluorescence quantitative PCR was utilized to detect FR+CTC. An ELISA kit was used to detect HSP90 expression. A timely follow-up study of patients with colorectal cancer was made.ResultsColorectal patients with liver metastases showed high expression of FR+CTCs and HSP90. The diagnostic ability of the combined receiver operating characteristic curve of FR+CTC and HSP90 (area under the curve [AUC]=0.79, sensitivity 70.55%, specificity 92.66%) was significantly greater than that of a single index. The results of timely follow-up of patients showed that the high expression of FR+CTC significantly shortened the median disease-free survival (mDFS) of 36.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.13–58.87, Logrank p < 0.0001) compared with the low expression cohort. The mDFS of the HSP90 high-expression cohort was significantly higher than that of the low-expression cohort (Logrank p = 0.0002), mDFS=58.47 months (95% CI: 37.12–79.81, Logrank p < 0.0001). We performed univariate and multivariate analyses to show that FR+CTC and HSP90 were risk factors for the progression of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) disease. We then constructed a high- and low-risk score model of risk factors to evaluate MCRC. The diagnostic sensitivity of the risk model for MCRC was significantly improved (AUC=0.89, sensitivity 85.29%, specificity 81.33%), and the mDFS of patients in a high-risk group increased to 33.28 months (95% CI: 27.24–39.31, Logrank p < 0.0001). The establishment of the model improves the early screening of patients with MCRC.ConclusionPatients with colorectal cancer and high expression of FR+CTC and HSP90 are at risk of liver metastasis and this suggests a poor prognosis. Combining the two markers can improve the early screening and diagnosis of LMCRC patients. In addition, combining a multivariate risk model can further assist patients in appropriate stratification and the design of tailored treatment regimens. However, further validation these markers is needed before their routine clinical application.

No abstract

Objective Circular RNAs (circRNAs), a specific type of non-coding RNAs, could regulate tumorigenesis and metastasis of various cancers though acting as competing endogenous RNA (ceRNAs). Methods Performing next generation sequencing (NGS) and bioinformatics methods, the profiles and the intricate roles of circRNAs were clarified in early stage colorectal cancer patients with hepatic metastases. Results CircRNAs were predicted to be involved in CRC hepatic metastasis complex processes, such as p53 binding and ErbB excision repair. Intriguingly, we detected 19 significantly differentially expressed among CRC patients with or without hepatic metastases and found circFARSA was significantly upregulated. Besides, circFARSA was found to be potential ceRNAs and a triple regulatory network of circFARSA/hsa-miR-503-5p/CCND2 was set up, which describes the possible mechanisms of CRC hepatic metastasis. Conclusions Our findings demonstrated that circFARSA acts as a promising biomarker in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The study provided a new perspective for targeting circFARSA in mCRC therapeutic treatment.