Our study complements previous research and provides information suggesting that efficient low-density EEG online decoding is within reach.

The dynamic attending theory as originally proposed by Jones, 1976. Psychol. Rev. 83(5), 323-355 posits that tone sequences presented at a regular rhythm entrain attentional oscillations and thereby facilitate the processing of sounds presented in phase with this rhythm. The increased interest in neural correlates of dynamic attending requires robust behavioral indicators of the phenomenon. Here we aimed to replicate and complement the most prominent experimental implementation of dynamic attending (Jones et al., 2002. Psychol. Sci. 13(4), 313-319). The paradigm uses a pitch comparison task in which two tones, the initial and the last of a longer series, have to be compared. In-between the two, distractor tones with variable pitch are presented, at a regular pace. A comparison tone presented in phase with the entrained rhythm is hypothesized to lead to better behavioral performance. Aiming for a conceptual replication, four different variations of the original paradigm were created which were followed by an exact replication attempt. Across all five experiments, only 40 of the 140 tested participants showed the hypothesized pattern of an inverted U-shaped profile in task accuracy, and the group average effects did not replicate the pattern reported by Jones et al., 2002. Psychol. Sci. 13(4), 313-319 in any of the five experiments. However, clear evidence for a relationship between musicality and overall behavioral performance was found. This study casts doubt on the suitability of the pitch comparison task for demonstrating auditory dynamic attending. We discuss alternative tasks that have been shown to support dynamic attending theory, thus lending themselves more readily to studying its neural correlates. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled SI: Prediction and Attention.

Objective: It has been suggested that the next major advancement in hearing aid (HA) technology needs to include cognitive feedback from the user to control HA functionality. In order to enable automatic brainwave-steered HA adjustments, attentional processes underlying speech-in-noise perception in aided hearing-impaired individuals need to be better understood. Here, we addressed the influence of two important factors for the listening performance of HA users -hearing aid processing and motivation -by analysing ongoing neural responses during long-term listening to continuous noisy speech.Methods: Sixteen normal-hearing (NH) and 15 linearly aided hearing-impaired (aHI) participants listened to an audiobook recording embedded in realistic speech babble noise at individually adjusted signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). A HA simulator was used for simulating a directional microphone setting as well as for providing individual amplification. To assess listening performance behaviourally, participants answered questions about the contents of the audiobook. We manipulated (1) the participants' motivation by offering a monetary reward for good listening performance in one half of the measurements and (2) the SNR by engaging/disengaging the directional microphone setting. During the speech-in-noise task, electroencephalography (EEG) signals were recorded using wireless, mobile hardware. EEG correlates of listening performance were investigated using EEG impulse responses, as estimated using the cross-correlation between the recorded EEG signal and the temporal envelope of the audiobook at the output of the HA simulator.Results: At the behavioural level, we observed better performance for the NH listeners than for the aHI listeners. Furthermore, the directional microphone setting led to better performance for both participant groups, and when the directional microphone setting was disengaged motivation also improved the performance of the aHI participants. Analysis of the EEG impulse responses showed faster N1-P2 responses for both groups and larger N2 peak amplitudes for the aHI group when the directional microphone setting was activated, but no physiological correlates of motivation. Significance:The results of this study indicate that motivation plays an important role for speech understanding in noise. In terms of neuro-steered HAs, our results suggest that the latency of attentional processes is influenced by HA-induced stimulus changes, which can potentially be used for inferring benefit from noise suppression processing automatically. Further research is necessary to identify the neural correlates of motivation as an exclusive top-down process and to combine such features with HA-driven ones for online HA adjustments.

No abstract

Difficulties in selectively attending to one among several speakers have mainly been associated with the distraction caused by ignored speech. Thus, in the current study, we investigated the neural processing of ignored speech in a two-competing-speaker paradigm. For this, we recorded the participant’s brain activity using electroencephalography (EEG) to track the neural representation of the attended and ignored speech envelope. To provoke distraction, we occasionally embedded the participant’s first name in the ignored speech stream. Retrospective reports as well as the presence of a P3 component in response to the name indicate that participants noticed the occurrence of their name. As predicted, the neural representation of the ignored speech envelope increased after the name was presented therein, suggesting that the name had attracted the participant’s attention. Interestingly, in contrast to our hypothesis, the neural tracking of the attended speech envelope also increased after the name occurrence. On this account, we conclude that the name might not have primarily distracted the participants, at most for a brief duration, but that it alerted them to focus to their actual task. These observations remained robust even when the sound intensity of the ignored speech stream, and thus the sound intensity of the name, was attenuated.