Genetic discoveries of Alzheimer’s disease are the drivers of our understanding, and together with polygenetic risk stratification can contribute towards planning of feasible and efficient preventive and curative clinical trials. We first perform a large genetic association study by merging all available case-control datasets and by-proxy study results (discovery n = 409,435 and validation size n = 58,190). Here, we add six variants associated with Alzheimer’s disease risk (near APP, CHRNE, PRKD3/NDUFAF7, PLCG2 and two exonic variants in the SHARPIN gene). Assessment of the polygenic risk score and stratifying by APOE reveal a 4 to 5.5 years difference in median age at onset of Alzheimer’s disease patients in APOE ɛ4 carriers. Because of this study, the underlying mechanisms of APP can be studied to refine the amyloid cascade and the polygenic risk score provides a tool to select individuals at high risk of Alzheimer’s disease.

Deciphering the genetic landscape of Alzheimer disease (AD) is essential to define the pathophysiological pathways involved and to successfully translate genomics to potential tailored medical care. To generate the most complete knowledge of the AD genetics, we developed through the European Alzheimer Disease BioBank (EADB) consortium a discovery meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) based on a new large case-control study and previous GWAS (in total 39,106 clinically diagnosed cases, 46,828 proxy-AD cases and 401,577 controls) with the most promising signals followed-up in independent samples (18,063 cases and 23,207 controls). In addition to 34 known AD loci, we report here the genome-wide significant association of 31 new loci with the risk of AD. Pathway-enrichment analyses strongly indicated the involvement of gene sets related to amyloid and Tau, but also highlighted microglia, in which increased gene expression corresponds to more significant AD risk. In addition, we successfully prioritized candidate genes in the majority of our new loci, with nine being primarily expressed in microglia. Finally, we observed that a polygenic risk score generated from this new genetic landscape was strongly associated with the risk of progression from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to dementia (4,609 MCI cases of whom 1,532 converted to dementia), independently of age and the APOE e4 allele.

Amyloid-β (Aβ) immunotherapy has recently begun to gain considerable attention as a potentially promising therapeutic approach to reducing the levels of Aβ in the Central Nervous System (CNS) of patients with Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Despite extensive preclinical evidence showing that immunization with Aβ(1-42) peptide can prevent or reverse the development of the neuropathological hallmarks of AD, in 2002, the clinical trial of AN-1792, the first trial involving an AD vaccine, was discontinued at Phase II when a subset of patients immunized with Aβ(1-42) developed meningoencephalitis, thereby making it necessary to take a more refined and strategic approach towards developing novel Aβ immunotherapy strategies by first constructing a safe and effective vaccine. This review describes the rational basis in modern clinical trials that have been designed to overcome the many challenges and known hurdles inherent to the search for effective AD immunotherapies. The precise delimitation of the most appropriate targets for AD vaccination remains a major point of discussion and emphasizes the need to target antigens in proteins involved in the early steps of the amyloid cascade. Other obstacles that have been clearly defined include the need to avoid unwanted anti-Aβ/APP Th1 immune responses, the need to achieve adequate responses to vaccination in the elderly and the need for precise monitoring. Novel strategies have been implemented to overcome these problems including the use of N-terminal peptides as antigens, the development of DNA based epitope vaccines and vaccines based on passive immunotherapy, recruitment of patients at earlier stages with support of novel biomarkers, the use of new adjuvants, the use of foreign T cell epitopes and viral-like particles and adopting new efficacy endpoints. These strategies are currently being tested in over 10,000 patients enrolled in one of the more than 40 ongoing clinical trials, most of which are expected to report final results within two years.