Utilization of CINB significantly improved pulmonary function, pain control, and shortens LOS in patients with rib fractures.

In our series, the selective use of helical CT scanning with plain radiography increased the accuracy with which cervical spine injury was detected from 54% to 100%. The protocol allowed for more rapid evaluation in many patients as well. We recommend that practice guidelines include the use of helical CT scan of the entire C-spine as the diagnostic procedure for those blunt trauma patients undergoing CT scanning of the head.

A successful technique for the treatment of anastomotic strictures after gastric bypass is presented. Most of the patients required one dilation. Most strictures appeared during the first 3 months after surgery. Female gender and leak may be high risk factors for the development of stricture.

Our data from the 1-year experience of our G-60 unit show that addressing the specific needs of elderly trauma patients will lead to better outcomes.

Computed tomography (CT) scan imaging of the bony spine has advanced with helical and currently multidetector images to allow reformatted axial collimation of images into two-dimensional and three-dimensional images. As a result, bony injuries to the TLS are commonly being identified. Most blunt trauma patients require CT to screen for other injuries. This has allowed the single admitting series of CT scans to also include screening for bony spine injuries. However, all of the publications fail to clearly define the criteria used to decide who gets radiographs or CT scans. No study has carefully conducted long-term follow-up on all of their trauma patients to identify all cases of TLS injury missed in the acute setting.

Patients with an ISS between 0 and 15 are often triaged to Level II activation. Our data would suggest that patients older than 60 years should be a criterion for the highest level of trauma activation.

No abstract

Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism constitute common preventable causes of morbidity and mortality. The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) continues to increase. Standard anticoagulation therapy may reduce the risk of fatal PE by 75% and that of recurrent VTE by over 90%. For patients who are not candidates for anticoagulation, a vena cava filter (VCF) may be beneficial. Despite a good overall safety record, significant complications related to VCF are occasionally seen. This review discusses both procedural and non-procedural complications associated with VCF placement and use. We will also discuss VCF use in the settings of pregnancy, malignancy, and the clinical need for more than one filter.