Summary Background Ustekinumab is effective in Crohn's disease. However, a substantial proportion of patients will not respond or lose response to ustekinumab. The current evidence to support the effectiveness of dose‐optimisation for ustekinumab nonresponse is limited. Aim To assess the effectiveness of dose escalation of ustekinumab. Methods This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study. We included active Crohn's disease patients who received a standard‐dose intravenous induction and at least one subcutaneous ustekinumab 90 mg dose. All enrolled patients received dose escalation by either shortening the interval between the doses to every 4 or 6 weeks, intravenous reinduction or a combination of strategies. The primary outcome of the study was clinical response at week 16 after dose escalation. Results A total of 142 patients (22 centres/14 countries) were included. The patients were dose‐escalated after a median treatment duration of 30 weeks. At week 16 from escalation, 73/142 (51.4%) responded to treatment, including 55/142 (38.7%) in clinical remission. Corticosteroid‐free remission was achieved in 6/34 (17.6%) patients on corticosteroids at the time of escalation; 118/142 (83%) continued treatment beyond week 16. Follow‐up data beyond week 16 were available for 74/118 (62.7%) patients. On the last follow‐up, 51/98 (52%) patients with available data responded to treatment, including 41/98 (42%) in clinical remission. Conclusions Intensification of ustekinumab maintenance dosage was effective in over 50% of the patients. This strategy should be considered in patients who are nonresponsive to every 8 weeks ustekinumab maintenance dosing.

No abstract

IFX was effective in the short- and mid-term in patients with chronic refractory pouchitis. However, medication had to be discontinued in a high number of patients.

In a large population of UC patients from two independent southern European countries, most patients did not require aggressive therapy, but extensive colitis was a clear risk factor for more severe disease.

Infection with SARS-CoV-2 has highly variable clinical manifestations, ranging from asymptomatic infection through to life-threatening disease. Host whole blood transcriptomics can offer unique insights into the biological processes underpinning infection and disease, as well as severity. We performed whole blood RNA Sequencing of individuals with varying degrees of COVID-19 severity. We used differential expression analysis and pathway enrichment analysis to explore how the blood transcriptome differs between individuals with mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19, performing pairwise comparisons between groups. Increasing COVID-19 severity was characterised by an abundance of inflammatory immune response genes and pathways, including many related to neutrophils and macrophages, in addition to an upregulation of immunoglobulin genes. In this study, for the first time, we show how immunomodulatory treatments commonly administered to COVID-19 patients greatly alter the transcriptome. Our insights into COVID-19 severity reveal the role of immune dysregulation in the progression to severe disease and highlight the need for further research exploring the interplay between SARS-CoV-2 and the inflammatory immune response.

No abstract

No abstract

Background Post-marketing data are required to confirm the durability and the long-term benefit and safety of UST in CD in clinical practice. Our aims were: (1) to evaluate the retention rate of UST in CD patients and to identify predictive factors of UST discontinuation; (2) to assess UST short-term effectiveness; (3) to analyse the durability of the response to UST in the long-term; and (4) to evaluate the safety of UST in clinical practice. Methods Retrospective, multicentre study (>60 centres). Patients with active CD [(Harvey–Bradshaw (HBI) >4)] that received at least one dose of UST intravenously before July 2018 were included. Clinical activity plus biochemical parameters were assessed at every UST administration. Clinical remission was defined as HBI score ≤4, and clinical response as a decrease in HBI ≥3 points. Loss of efficacy was defined as reappearance of symptoms that led to intensify the treatment dose, add another medication to control CD, switching or surgery in patients with short-term remission. The retention rate of UST treatment and the cumulative incidence of loss of efficacy were evaluated by survival curves, and predictive factors were assessed by Cox-regression. The short-term response was evaluated at week 8 and after the induction (week 16). Factors associated with short-term remission were assessed by multivariate analysis. Adverse events were recorded. Data quality was assured by remote monitoring. Results 331 CD patients have been included up to date (Table 1). The incidence rate of UST discontinuation was 15% per patient-year of follow-up: 8%, 13% and 20% at 6, 12 and 18 months (Figure 1). Previous surgery was the only factor associated with a higher risk of UST discontinuation [Hazard ratio (HR) = 2.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.1–3.6]. Short-term efficacy is shown in Figure 2. Previous surgery (OR = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.2–0.6) and higher HBI score at baseline (OR = 0.8, 95% CI=0.8–0.9) were associated with an impaired response to UST at week 16. The cumulative incidence of loss of response was 32% per-patient-year of follow-up (Figure 3); A higher HBI score at baseline was associated with a higher risk of losing response (HR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.1–1.3). Neither the concomitant treatment with immunosuppressants nor the number of previous biologics were associated with UST short- and long-term benefit. Thirty adverse events were reported in 25 (7%) patients (Table 2). Conclusion Sustain is the largest real clinical practice study of UST to treat CD patients with the longest follow-up reported to date. UST was demonstrated to be effective in real-world use in the short and long run. Safety was consistent with the known profile of UST.