Research was conducted to evaluate the performance of a method for rating the surface condition of low-volume unsurfaced roads and eventually to adapt the method to the situation prevailing in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. The rating method selected as the basis for this experiment is the unsurfaced road condition index (URCI) developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The field research comprised subjective evaluations and URCI determinations performed by a rating panel composed of seven members. Some of the main questions underlying the research are: Are the original URCI deduct values curves adequate for the south Brazilian region? If not, is it possible to construct deduct values curves similar to URCI’s? To what extent can a rating panel be used to construct and calibrate these curves? Five unsurfaced county roads were selected according to the criteria of maximum soil and conditions variability. From these roads 14 segments 300 m length were selected and divided into 140 sample units 30 m in length. The rating panel attributed scores for the section, for each sample unit, and for each distress found in the sample unit. It was concluded that the panel scores for distress and surface condition of sample unit and section do not agree with the URCI computed by the method and that there is some coherence between the subjective scores given to the sample units and the score given to the section composed of these sample units.
To develop a new specification of material for surfacing unpaved roads, an experiment was conducted on 41 unpaved road sections located in five different physiographical regions in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The behavior of the sections under observation was analyzed qualitatively to evaluate the performance of the applied surfacing material. Because the traditional soil classifications (Highway Research Board and Unified Soil Classification System) are not suitable for classifying tropical soils, a new classification, namely MCT (miniature, compacted, tropical), developed in Brazil in 1981 was adopted as a basis for material selection. The behavior parameters observed were support, frictional resistance, and durability. The results obtained led to the specifications presented here, which were tested during a doctorate research program developed between 1991 and 1996 conducted by the first author and supervised by the second. It was concluded that the proposed specification based on the MCT classification system is more adequate than the ones previously used based on traditional classifications. The “binder content” of soils, a measure similar to that used for bituminous materials (asphalt binder content) is introduced to evaluate the agglomerating capacity of the fine fraction and, therefore, the material durability.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.