Background and study aims: Bariatric endoscopy has emerged as an aid in the nonsurgical treatment of obesity. The objective of this study is to critically provide the results and follow-up of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty 1 year after the procedure.
Patients and methods: Prospective single-center follow-up study of 25 patients (5 men, 20 women) who underwent flexible endoscopic suturing for endoluminal gastric volume reduction. A multidisciplinary team provided post-procedure care. Patient outcomes were recorded at 1 year after the procedure. Linear regression analysis was done to evaluate the variables associated with best results at 1 year of follow-up.
Results: Mean body mass index (BMI) was 38.5 ± 4.6 kg/m2 (range 30 – 47) and mean age 44.5 ± 8.2 years (range 29 – 60). At 1 year, 22 patients continued with the follow-up (2 dropped out at 6 months and 1 at 3 months). There were no major intra-procedural, early, or delayed adverse events. Mean BMI loss was 7.3 ± 4.2 kg/m2, and mean percentage of total body weight loss was 18.7 ± 10.7 at 1 year. In the linear regression analysis, adjusted by initial BMI, variables associated with %TBWL involved the frequency of nutritional (β = 0.563, P = 0.014) and psychological contacts (β = 0.727, P = 0.025). The number of nutritional and psychological contacts were predictive of good weight loss results.
Conclusions: Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty is a feasible, reproducible, and effective procedure to treat obesity. Nutritional and psychological interaction are predictive of success.
The DJBL rapidly normalized glycemic control in obese T2DM subjects, a promising development in the search for novel therapies less invasive than bariatric surgery.
Background:Bariatric endoscopic techniques are minimally invasive and induce gastric volume reduction to treat obesity. Aim: To evaluate endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (Apollo method) using a suturing method directed at the greater curvature, as well as the perioperative care, two year safety and weight loss. Method:Prospective single-center study over 154 patients (108 females) using the endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty procedure under general anesthesia with overnight inpatient observation. Of the154 initial patients, 143 were available for 1-month of follow-up, 133 for 6-month, 64 for 12-month and 28 completed the 24 month assessment. Follow-up was carried out by a multidisciplinary team (nutritionist and psychologist). Outcomes evaluated were: change in BMI; change in body weight (TBWL); % of loss of initial body weight (%TBWL); % of excess body weight loss (%EWL) (segregated in > or <25% and adverse effects. Voluntary oral contrasted radiological examinations were scheduled to assess the gastroplasty at different times post-procedure. Results:Mean age was 44.9 (23-69) years. At 24 months after the procedure baseline mean BMI change from 38.3 to 30.8 kg/m2. TBWL, %TBWL and %EWL were of 21.3 kg, 19.5% and 60.4% respectively. 85.7% of patients achieve the goal of >25% %EWL. There were no mayor adverse events intraprocedure or during the 24 months of follow-up.
Conclusion:Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty with regular monitoring by a multidisciplinary team can be considered an effective, safe and well tolerated procedure for obesity treatment, at least for two years of follow-up.
The effectiveness of gastric injections of botulinum toxin-A (BTA) as primary treatment for obesity is not well known since results in literature are discrepant. Hence, we aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the available data to assess the real effect of BTA therapy. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, SCOPUS, EBSCO, LILACS, and BVS. We considered eligible only randomized controlled trials enrolling obese patients comparing BTA versus saline injections. Our initial search identified 8811 records. Six studies fulfilled eligibility criteria. After critical appraisal, two articles were excluded and we meta-analyzed the remainder. The mean difference for absolute weight loss and BMI reduction were 0.12 [CI 95%, - 1.14, 1.38] and - 0.06 [95% CI, - 0.92, 0.81], respectively. Therefore, we concluded that treatment of obesity with BTA is not effective.
Background: Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) was
introduced into bariatric surgery by Sanchez-Pernaute et al. as an advancement of
the biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Aim:To evaluate the SADI-S procedure with regard to weight loss, comorbidity
resolution, and complication rate in the super obese population. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on initial 72 patients who underwent
laparoscopic or robot-assisted laparoscopic SADI-S between December
17th, 2013 and July 29th, 2015. Results: A total of 48 female and 21 male patients were included with a mean age of
42.4±10.0 years (range, 22-67). The mean body mass index (BMI) at the time of
procedure was 58.4±8.3 kg/m2 (range, 42.3-91.8). Mean length of
hospital stay was 4.3±2.6 days (range, 3-24). Thirty-day readmission rate was 4.3%
(n=3), due to tachycardia (n=1), deep venous thrombosis (n=1), and viral
gastroenteritis (n=1). Thirty-day reoperation rate was 5.8% (n=4) for perforation
of the small bowel (n=1), leakage (n=1), duodenal stump leakage (n=1), and
diagnostic laparoscopy (n=1). Percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) was 28.5±8.8
% (range, 13.3-45.0) at three months (n=28), 41.7±11.1 % (range, 19.6-69.6) at six
months (n=50), and 61.6±12.0 % (range, 40.1-91.2) at 12 months (n=23) after the
procedure. A total of 18 patients (26.1%) presented with type II diabetes mellitus
at the time of surgery. Of these patients, 9 (50.0%) had their diabetes resolved,
and six (33.3%) had it improved by 6-12 months after SADI-S. Conclusions: SADI-S is a feasible operation with a promising weight loss and diabetes
resolution in the super-obese population.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.