Conspectus
Room temperature phosphorescence (RTP) materials,
which could respond
to external stimuli, such as force, heat, light, electric filed, etc., have drawn increasing attention for their broad application
prospects, especially in the fields of anticounterfeiting, sensors,
data storage, and so on. In comparison with the traditional fluorescence
ones, RTP materials show much longer emission lifetimes, which can
be even caught by the naked eye. Thus, the change in emission lifetime
under an external stimulus for RTP materials can be also a potential
monitoring parameter, in addition to emission color and intensity.
In other words, the number of visual monitoring parameters could increase
from two to three in RTP materials, which would greatly facilitate
their practical applications. Until now, RTP materials have been typically
limited to metal-containing inorganic materials, particularly rare-earth
phosphors. Their emissions are governed by the slow liberation of
trapped charge carriers from isolated traps of impurities, defects,
or ions through thermal stimulation with low luminescence efficiency.
However, these materials suffer from some intrinsic disadvantages,
including high cost, potential toxicity, and instability in aqueous
environments. In order to solve these problems, the purely organic
RTP materials should be a good choice. However, these kinds of materials
are really scarce now, especially for the ones with stimulus response
characteristic.
To develop purely organic RTP materials with
a stimulus response
effect, we and other scientists have tried a lot. Luckily, some progresses
have been made. In this Account, we present our recent progress on
the stimulus-responsive room temperature phosphorescence of organic
materials, mainly focusing on the internal mechanism and potential
applications. First, the fundamental knowledge is described to illustrate
the importance and main principles of the stimulus-responsive RTP
effect. Then, some typical stimulus-responsive RTP materials based
on different internal mechanisms are discussed. Mainly, two kinds
of stimulus-responsive RTP materials were introduced, namely, single-component
and multicomponent ones. Correspondingly, their dynamic change of
the RTP property under external stimulus occurred based on the distinct
internal mechanisms. For single-component materials, the changes in
molecular structure, packing, or conformation, have played a significant
role in their corresponding stimulus-responsive RTP effect. As for
multicomponent materials, the changed oxygen concentration in matrix
and intermolecular distance between different components were found
more during the stimulus-responsive RTP process. Accordingly, different
potential applications were explored based on the different stimulus-responsive
RTP processes. With the classification of stimulus-responsive RTP
materials based on different internal mechanisms, the corresponding
design strategy could be well proposed, thus guiding the further development
of this research field.