Our results showed that pretreatment with dutasteride for 6 weeks before TURP reduces the surgical bleeding considerably. This treatment schedule can be used routinely to decrease TURP surgical bleeding.
The management of prostate biopsy in men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer has changed in the last few years, especially with the introduction of imaging techniques, to overcome the low efficacy of risk stratification based on PSA levels. Here, we aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric MRI with fusion ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy and standard biopsy, both performed through the transperineal route. To this end, we retrospectively analyzed 272 patients who underwent combined transperineal targeted and standard biopsy during the same session. The primary outcome was to compare the cancer detection rate between targeted and standard biopsy. The secondary outcome was to evaluate the added value of combined targeted and standard biopsy approach as compared to only targeted or standard biopsy. Results showed that a rate of 16.7% clinically significant tumors (International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade ≥ 2) would have been lost if only the standard biopsy had been used. The combined targeted and standard biopsy showed an added value of 10.3% and 9.9% in reducing the risk of prostate cancer missing after targeted or standard biopsy alone, respectively. The combined targeted and standard biopsy pathway is recommended to reduce the risk of missing clinically significant prostate cancer.
e11577 Background: The addition of trastuzumab to adjuvant chemotherapy is standard for Her2(+) breast cancer. In our practice, adjuvant docetaxel/cyclophosphamide (DC) + 1 yr of trastuzumab is offered to pts with low-risk Her2(+) disease. Although the HERA trial allowed the use of a variety of chemotherapy regimens to combine with trastuzumab, it predates the acceptance of DC as an adjuvant care-standard and therefore the safety profile of DCH has not been reported. Methods: We conducted a two-center, retrospective cohort study including all pts treated with adjuvant DCH between 12/06 and 3/08 to assess its safety profile. Using the CTCAE criteria, records were screened for toxicity from DCH initiation to the present. The primary outcome was cardiac toxicity defined as clinical CHF or a confirmed significant LVEF decline (≥ 16% decrease in EF from baseline or EF < 50% + ≥ 10% decrease from baseline). Results: 27 pts, mean age 54, were identified with a median follow-up of 23.4 months (range 12.2- 42.0 months). The mean tumor size was 1.4 cm (0.5–4.3 cm) with 84% hormone receptor(+), 96% node(-) and 100% Her2(+) by FISH or IHC. 52% of pts received DCH concurrently and 48% received trastuzumab following DC. Baseline mean EF was 65% (53–86%). EF assessments were performed every 3 months/pt. 7.4% and 11.1% of pts had a prior history of anthracycline exposure or cardiac disease respectively. 11.1% of pts experienced a significant LVEF decline occurring on ≥ 2 sequential EF measurements. The trastuzumab discontinuation rate was 3.7% (1 pt). No pt developed clinical CHF. 88% of pts have now completed trastuzumab therapy. 33% of pts received pegfilgrastim with chemotherapy. 25% of pts experienced grade III-IV neutropenia. Grade III-IV anemia and thrombocytopenia were not observed. Trastuzumab-related infusion reactions were observed in 1 pt and did not warrant drug discontinuation. At this time all pts are alive and no patient has experienced disease recurrence. Conclusions: The DCH regimen, given in sequence or concomitantly, appears to be a safe and effective adjuvant treatment for women with Her2(+) disease. Along with docetaxel/carboplatin/trastuzumab, DCH represents another acceptable non-anthracycline containing regimen for low-risk, Her2(+) pts. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.