OBJECTIVETo evaluate the effects of two bariatric procedures versus intensive medical therapy (IMT) on β-cell function and body composition.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSThis was a prospective, randomized, controlled trial of 60 subjects with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (HbA1c 9.7 ± 1%) and moderate obesity (BMI 36 ± 2 kg/m2) randomized to IMT alone, IMT plus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, or IMT plus sleeve gastrectomy. Assessment of β-cell function (mixed-meal tolerance testing) and body composition was performed at baseline and 12 and 24 months.RESULTSGlycemic control improved in all three groups at 24 months (N = 54), with a mean HbA1c of 6.7 ± 1.2% for gastric bypass, 7.1 ± 0.8% for sleeve gastrectomy, and 8.4 ± 2.3% for IMT (P < 0.05 for each surgical group versus IMT). Reduction in body fat was similar for both surgery groups, with greater absolute reduction in truncal fat in gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy (−16 vs. −10%; P = 0.04). Insulin sensitivity increased significantly from baseline in gastric bypass (2.7-fold; P = 0.004) and did not change in sleeve gastrectomy or IMT. β-Cell function (oral disposition index) increased 5.8-fold in gastric bypass from baseline, was markedly greater than IMT (P = 0.001), and was not different between sleeve gastrectomy versus IMT (P = 0.30). At 24 months, β-cell function inversely correlated with truncal fat and prandial free fatty acid levels.CONCLUSIONSBariatric surgery provides durable glycemic control compared with intensive medical therapy at 2 years. Despite similar weight loss as sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass uniquely restores pancreatic β-cell function and reduces truncal fat, thus reversing the core defects in diabetes.

No abstract

No abstract

Although nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is frequent in obesity, the metabolic determinants of advanced liver disease remain unclear. Adipokines reflect inflammation and insulin resistance associated with obesity and may identify advanced NAFLD. At the time of obesity surgery, 142 consecutive patients underwent liver biopsy and had their preoperative demographic and clinical data obtained. Liver histology was scored by the NAFLD activity score, and patients subdivided into four groups. Concentrations of retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4), adiponectin, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and leptin were determined ~1 week prior to surgery and results were related to liver histology. The prevalence of no NAFLD was 30%, simple steatosis 23%, borderline nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) 28%, and definitive NASH 18%. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and metabolic syndrome (MS) prevalence were 39 and 75%, respectively, and did not differ across the four histological groups (P = NS). Triglyceride (TG) and alanine transaminase (ALT) levels, strongly associated with advanced stages of NAFLD and NASH (P = 0.04). TG levels >150 mg/dl, increased the likelihood of NASH 3.4-fold, whereas high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels predicted no NAFLD (P < 0.01). Concentrations of TNF-α, leptin, and RBP4 did not differ among histological groups and thus did not identify NASH; however, there was a trend for adiponectin to be lower in NASH vs. no NAFLD (P = 0.061). In summary, both TG and ALT levels assist in identification of NASH in an obesity surgery cohort. These findings underscore the importance of fatty acid delivery mechanisms to NASH development in severely obese individuals.

Context: Glucocorticoids are known to acutely increase blood pressure, suppress inflammation, and precipitate insulin resistance. However, the short-term effects of glucocorticoids on other cardiovascular risk factors remain incompletely characterized.Objective: Our objective was to determine the effects of a short course of dexamethasone on multiple cardiovascular biomarkers and to determine whether suppression of morning cortisol in response to low-dose dexamethasone is correlated with cardiovascular risk markers in healthy volunteers. Design:We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Setting:The study took place in a tertiary care hospital. Study subjects: Twenty-five healthy male volunteers, ages 19 -39 yr, participated in the study.Intervention: Subjects received either 3 mg dexamethasone twice daily or placebo for 5 d. Subjects also underwent a low-dose (0.5 mg) overnight dexamethasone suppression test. Measures:Parameters examined before and after the 5-d intervention included heart rate, blood pressure, weight, fasting lipid variables, homocysteine, renin, aldosterone, insulin resistance (homeostasis model assessment), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, B-type natriuretic peptide, flow-mediated and nitroglycerin-mediated brachial artery dilatation, and heart rate recovery after exercise. All measurements were done in the morning hours in the fasting state.Results: Dexamethasone increased systolic blood pressure, weight, B-type natriuretic peptide, and high-density-lipoprotein-cholesterol. Dexamethasone decreased resting heart rate, high-sensitivity Creactive protein, and aldosterone and tended to attenuate nitroglycerin-mediated vasodilatation. There was no effect on flow-mediated vasodilatation, diastolic blood pressure, triglycerides, low-densitylipoprotein-cholesterol, nonesterified fatty acids, homocysteine, or heart rate recovery. The response of circulating cortisol to low-dose dexamethasone had no significant correlation with any of the cardiovascular risk markers. Conclusions

TSHR mRNA provides an additional clinical tool for the evaluation of patients with thyroid nodules. It is particularly useful in guiding appropriate initial surgery for follicular neoplasms. TSHR mRNA also represents a new blood test to aid assessment of disease status in thyroid cancer follow-up.

Because thyroid cancer cells express functional TSH receptors (TSHR), TSHR-mRNA in peripheral blood might serve as a tissue-/cancer-specific marker. We measured circulating TSHR-mRNA by RT-PCR in 51 normal controls, 27 patients with benign thyroid disease, 67 patients with treated differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), and eight patients with newly diagnosed DTC, preoperatively. Results were compared with thyroglobulin (Tg) mRNA and serum Tg levels. TSHR-mRNA signals were not detected in normal controls and in 24 of 27 (89%) patients with benign thyroid disease. All 19 patients with treated DTC with evidence of distant or local disease tested positive for TSHR-mRNA (sensitivity 100%). Among patients with no evidence of disease, TSHR-mRNA was detected in 1 in 48 (specificity 98%). Six of the eight newly diagnosed DTC patients tested preoperatively were positive for TSHR-mRNA. The concordance between TSHR-mRNA and Tg-mRNA and between TSHR-mRNA and serum Tg was 95%. Fourteen patients with DTC (21%) had Tg antibodies, three with local disease (all positive for TSHR-mRNA), and 11 with no evidence of disease (all negative for TSHR-mRNA). Our results indicate that TSHR-mRNA and/or Tg-mRNA in peripheral blood are both equally sensitive and specific markers for monitoring thyroid cancer patients. Their principal value resides in the Tg antibody-positive patients in whom a positive or a negative mRNA value might have indicated or obviated the need for a whole-body scan. Furthermore, the high specificity combined with their ability to predict thyroid cancer preoperatively suggests a potential role in detecting thyroid cancer in patients with thyroid nodules.

TSHR mRNA measured with FNA enhances the preoperative detection of cancer in patients with thyroid nodules, reducing unnecessary surgeries, and immediate postoperative levels can predict residual/metastatic disease.