The dimeric form of the kinesin motor and neck domain from rat brain with bound ADP has been solved by X-ray crystallography. The two heads of the dimer are connected via a coiled-coil alpha-helical interaction of their necks. They are broadly similar to one another; differences are most apparent in the head-neck junction and in a moderate reorientation of the neck helices in order to adopt to the coiled-coil conformation. The heads show a rotational symmetry (approximately 120 degrees) about an axis close to that of the coiled-coil. This arrangement is unexpected since it is not compatible with the microtubule lattice. In this arrangement, the two heads of a kinesin dimer could not have equivalent interactions with microtubules.

We have determined the X-ray structure of rat kinesin head and neck domains. The folding of the core motor domain resembles that of human kinesin reported recently [Kull, F. J., et al. (1996) Nature 380, 550-554]. Novel features of the structure include the N-terminal region, folded as a beta-strand, and the C-terminal transition from the motor to the rod domain, folded as two beta-strands plus an alpha-helix. This helix is the beginning of kinesin's neck responsible for dimerization of the motor complex and for force transduction. Although the folding of the motor domain core is similar to that of a domain of myosin (an actin-dependent motor), the position and angle of kinesin's neck are very different from those of myosin's stalk, suggesting that the two motors have different mechanisms of force transduction. The N- and C-terminal ends of the core motor, thought to be responsible for the directionality of the motors [Case, R. B., et al. (1997) Cell 90, 959-966], take the form of beta-strands attached to the central beta-sheet of the structure.

No abstract

We have decorated microtubules with monomeric and dimeric kinesin constructs, studied their structure by cryoelectron microscopy and three-dimensional image reconstruction, and compared the results with the x-ray crystal structure of monomeric and dimeric kinesin. A monomeric kinesin construct (rK354, containing only a short neck helix insufficient for coiled-coil formation) decorates microtubules with a stoichiometry of one kinesin head per tubulin subunit (α–β-heterodimer). The orientation of the kinesin head (an anterograde motor) on the microtubule surface is similar to that of ncd (a retrograde motor). A longer kinesin construct (rK379) forms a dimer because of the longer neck helix forming a coiled-coil. Unexpectedly, this construct also decorates the microtubule with a stoichiometry of one head per tubulin subunit, and the orientation is similar to that of the monomeric construct. This means that the interaction with microtubules causes the two heads of a kinesin dimer to separate sufficiently so that they can bind to two different tubulin subunits. This result is in contrast to recent models and can be explained by assuming that the tubulin–kinesin interaction is antagonistic to the coiled-coil interaction within a kinesin dimer.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Recently, the molecular structures of monomeric and dimeric kinesin constructs in complex with ADP have been determined by X-ray crystallography (Kull et al. 1996; Kozielski et al. 1997 a; Sack et al. 1997). The "motor" or "head" domains have almost identical conformations in the known crystal structures, yet the kinesin dimer is asymmetric: the orientation of the two heads relative to the coiled-coil formed by their neck regions is different. We used small angle solution scattering of kinesin constructs and microtubules decorated with kinesin in order to find out whether these crystal structures are of relevance for kinesin's structure under natural conditions and for its interaction with microtubules. Our preliminary results indicate that the crystal structures of monomeric and dimeric kinesin are similar to their structures in solution, though in solution the center-of-mass distance between the motor domains of the dimer could be slightly greater. The crystal structure of dimeric kinesin can be interpreted as representing two equivalent conformations. Transitions between these or very similar conformational states may occur in solution. Binding of kinesin to microtubules has conformational effects on both, the kinesin and the microtubule. Solution scattering of kinesin decorated microtubules reveals a peak in intensity that is characteristic for the B-surface lattice and that can be used to monitor the axial repeat of the microtubules under various conditions. In decoration experiments, dimeric kinesin dissociates, at least partly, leading to a stoichiometry of 1:1 (one kinesin head per tubulin dimer; Thormählen et al. 1998a) in contrast to the stoichiometry of 2:1 reported for dimeric ncd. This discrepancy is possibly due to the effect of steric hindrance between kinesin dimers on adjacent binding sites.