• Diffusion-weighted MRI is increasingly applied in evaluation of cervical cancer. • Cervical cancer has distinctive perfusion and diffusion characteristics. • Intravoxel incoherent motion characteristics can differentiate cervical cancer from non-malignant uterine tissues.

Cervical cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death in women globally, despite the widespread use of cytology/human papillomavirus (HPV) screening. In the present study, we aimed to identify the potential role of microRNA (miRNA) as a diagnostic biomarker in the detection of cervical pre‐malignant lesions and cancer. In total, we recruited 582 patients with cervical diseases and 145 control individuals. The expression levels of six miRNAs (miR‐20a, miR‐92a, miR‐141, miR‐183*, miR‐210 and miR‐944) were found to be significantly up‐regulated in cervical cancer and pre‐malignant lesions compared to normal cervical samples, indicating that they are oncogenic miRNAs. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that these six miRNAs can be used to distinguish patients with cervical pre‐malignant lesions or cancer from normal individuals and they also had a good predictive performance, particularly in cervical lesions. Combined use of these six miRNAs further enhanced the diagnostic accuracy over any single miRNA marker, with an area under the curve of 0.998, 0.996 and 0.959, a diagnostic sensitivity of 97.9%, 97.2% and 91.4%, and a specificity of 98.6%, 96.6% and 87.6% for low‐grade lesions, high‐grade lesions and cancer, respectively. This six oncogenic miRNA signature may be suitable for use as diagnostic marker for cervical pre‐malignant lesions and cancer in the near future.

Both educational interventions were comparable in relieving adverse HPV-related psychosocial effects. Combination of counselling and leaflet were more effective than leaflet only in improving women's knowledge on cervical screening and HPV soon after educational interventions but the benefit was not apparent after 6 months.

Currently, the routine follow-up (FU) of gynaecological malignancies is primarily delivered by specialists in secondary care, whose intentions are to maximise the detection rate of recurrent disease prior to the onset of symptoms, on view to the initiation of early treatment to optimise outcome and disease prognosis (Hoeg et al., 2019; Leeson, Stuart, Sylvestre, Hall, & Whitaker, 2013). It has been long presumed that oncologist-led FU, given the lack of primary care utilisation in survivorship care, is the most effective method of following up survivors of gynaecological malignancies. It is also considered to be the ideal setting to elicit symptoms, both physical and psychological, of residual disease and late effects of therapy from the patient. Yet, a Cochrane review on FU strategies after completion of primary cancer treatment in cancer survivors found uncertain effects of non-specialist-led FU on survival and detection of recurrence (Hoeg et al., 2019). There is also conflicting evidence on how frequency of follow-up affects quality of life (QoL), anxiety and depression. Indeed, evidence to the contrary, which claims that the role of clinical testing in tandem with routine

We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial with two screening rounds to evaluate the effectiveness of combining HPV testing with liquid‐based cytology (LBC) as a co‐test, compared to LBC only in cervical cancer screening of a Chinese population. First, 15,955 women aged 30–60 were randomized at a 1:1 ratio into an intervention group (Digene Hybrid Capture 2 HPV test with LBC) and a control group (LBC alone). Women in the intervention group would be referred for colposcopy and biopsy immediately if they were found to have high‐risk HPV regardless of cytology results. The detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or above (CIN2+) lesions was significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control (0.95% vs. 0.38%, OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.65–3.88). At the subsequent round of screening approximately 36 months later, CIN2+ detection was significantly lower in the intervention group (0.08% vs. 0.35%, OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.08–0.57). Over the two rounds of screening, the total detection of CIN2+ was higher in the intervention group (1.01% vs. 0.66%, OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.09–2.19). There was a fourfold increase (10.6% vs. 2.4%, p < 0.001) in the number of colposcopies performed in the intervention arm. Adding a high‐risk HPV test to cytology for primary cervical screening led to earlier detection of clinically significant preinvasive lesions, resulting in a reduced detection of CIN2+ lesions in subsequent rounds and an increased rate of colposcopy.

E2 protein binding to the four E2 binding sites (E2BSs) at the long control region of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) 16/18 genome may exert either transcriptional activation/repression on E6 and E7 oncoproteins. Methylation status at the E2BSs may affect the relative binding of E2 protein to them. In this study, methylation percentage at E2BS 1, 2 (promoter-proximal), and 4 (promoter-distal) were assessed by pyrosequencing and compared among HPV 16/18-positive cervical cancer, high-grade, and low-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance, and normal cervical epithelium. HPV 16 E2BS1&2 were more methylated than HPV 16 E2BS4 in cervical cancer whereas in cervical premalignant lesions and normal epithelium, HPV 16 E2BS1&2 were less methylated than HPV 16 E2BS4. HPV 18 E2BS1&2 remained more methylated than E2BS4 in all histological groups. HPV 16 E2BS1&2 methylation increased from high-grade lesions to cervical cancer (P < 0.001). HPV 16 E2BS4 methylation increased from low-grade to high-grade premalignant lesions (P = 0.041). Both HPV 18 E2BS1&2 and E2BS4 methylation increased from low-grade to high-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (P = 0.019 and 0.001 respectively) and further increased form high-grade lesions to cervical cancer (P < 0.001 and 0.005 respectively). Conclusively, HPV 16 E2BS1&2 (for transcriptional repression of E6/E7 oncoproteins) became more heavily methylated than E2BS4 (for transcriptional activation of E6/E7) in cervical cancer, favouring the differential binding of E2 protein to E2BS4. Increasing methylation at HPV 16/18 E2BSs are potentially useful adjunctive molecular markers for predicting progression from low-grade to high-grade cervical premalignant lesions and from high-grade lesions to cervical cancer.

No abstract

The accurate prediction of malignancy for a pelvic mass detected on ultrasound allows for appropriate referral to specialised care. IOTA simple rules are one of the best methods but are inconclusive in 25% of cases, where subjective assessment by an expert sonographer is recommended but may not always be available. In the present paper, we evaluate the methods for assessing the nature of a pelvic mass, including IOTA with subjective assessment by expert ultrasound, RMI and ROMA. In particular, we investigate whether ROMA can replace expert ultrasound when IOTA is inconclusive. This prospective study involves one cancer centre and three general units. Women scheduled for an operation for a pelvic mass underwent a pelvic ultrasound pre-operatively. The final histology was obtained from the operative sample. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for each method were compared with the McNemar test. Of the 690 women included in the study, 171 (25%) had an inconclusive IOTA. In this group, expert ultrasound was more sensitive in diagnosing a malignant mass compared to ROMA (81% vs. 63%, p = 0.009) with no significant difference in the specificity or accuracy. All assessment methods involving IOTA had similar accuracies and were more accurate than RMI or ROMA alone. In conclusion, when IOTA was inconclusive, assessment by expert ultrasound was more sensitive than ROMA, with similar specificity.