Weight-adjusted IV reslizumab was superior to fixed-dose SC mepolizumab in attenuating airway eosinophilia in prednisone-dependent patients with asthma, with associated improvement in asthma control. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 02559791).

This study identifies an autoimmune endotype of severe asthma that can be identified by the presence of sputum autoantibodies against EPX and autologous cellular components.

BackgroundIn clinical trials, the two anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs, mepolizumab and reslizumab) that are approved to treat severe eosinophilic asthma, reduce exacerbations by approximately 50–60%.ObjectiveTo observe response to anti-IL-5 mAbs in real-life clinical setting, and to evaluate predictors of sub-optimal response.MethodsIn four Canadian academic centres, pre-defined clinical end-points in 250 carefully characterised moderate-to-severe asthmatics were collected prospectively to assess response to the two anti-IL-5 mAbs. Sub-optimal responses was determined based on failure to reduce maintenance corticosteroid (MCS) or asthma symptoms scores (ACQ) or exacerbations, in addition to persistence of sputum/blood eosinophils. Worsening in suboptimal responders were assessed based on reduced lung function by 25% or any increase in MCS/ACQ. A representative sub-set of 39 patients were evaluated for inflammatory mediators, autoantibodies and complement activation in sputum (by ELISA) and for immune-complex deposition by immunostaining formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sputum plugs.ResultsSub-optimal responses were observed in 42.8% (107/250) patients treated with either mepolizumab/reslizumab. Daily prednisone requirement, sinus disease, and late-onset asthma diagnoses were the strongest predictors of sub-optimal response. Asthma worsened in 13% (34/250) of these patients. Majority (79%) of them were prednisone-dependent. Presence of sputum anti-eosinophil peroxidase immunoglobulin (Ig)G was a predictor of sub-optimal response to an anti-IL-5 mAb. An increase in sputum C3c (marker of complement activation) and deposition of C1q-bound/IL-5-bound IgG were observed in the sputa of those patients who worsened on therapy, suggesting an underlying autoimmune-mediated pathology.ConclusionA significant number of patients who meet currently approved indications for anti-IL5 mAbs show sub-optimal response to them in real-life clinical practice. Monitoring blood eosinophil count is not helpful to identify these patients. The concern of worsening of symptoms associated with immune-complex mediated complement-activation in a small proportion of these patients highlights the relevance of recognising airway autoimmune phenomena and this requires further evaluation.

Asthma and autoimmune diseases both result from a dysregulated immune system, and have been conventionally considered to have mutually exclusive pathogenesis. Autoimmunity is believed to be an exaggerated Th1 response, while asthma with a Th2 underpinning is congruent with the well-accepted Th1/Th2 paradigm. The hypothesis of autoimmune involvement in asthma has received much recent interest, particularly in the adult late-onset non-atopic patients (the “intrinsic asthma”). Over the past decades, circulating autoantibodies against diverse self-targets (beta-2-adrenergic receptors, epithelial antigens, nuclear antigens, etc.) have been reported and subsequently dismissed to be epiphenomena resulting from a chronic inflammatory condition, primarily due to lack of evidence of causality/pathomechanism. Recent evidence of ‘granulomas’ in the lung biopsies of severe asthmatics, detection of pathogenic sputum autoantibodies against autologous eosinophil proteins (e.g., eosinophil peroxidase) and inadequate response to monoclonal antibody therapies (e.g., subcutaneous mepolizumab) in patients with evidence of airway autoantibodies suggest that the role of autoimmune mechanisms be revisited. In this review, we have gathered available reports of autoimmune responses in the lungs, reviewed the evidence in the context of immunogenic tissue-response and danger-associated molecular patterns, and constructed the possibility of an autoimmune-associated pathomechanism that may contribute to the severity of asthma.

Eosinophils are an enigmatic white blood cell, whose immune functions are still under intense investigation. Classically, the eosinophil was considered to fulfill a protective role against parasitic infections, primarily large multicellular helminths. Although eosinophils are predominantly associated with parasite infections, evidence of a role for eosinophils in mediating immunity against bacterial, viral, and fungal infections has been recently reported. Among the mechanisms by which eosinophils are proposed to exert their protective effects is the production of DNA-based extracellular traps (ETs). Remarkably, DNA serves a role that extends beyond its biochemical function in encoding RNA and protein sequences; it is also a highly effective substance for entrapment of bacteria and other extracellular pathogens, and serves as valuable scaffolding for antimicrobial mediators such as granule proteins from immune cells. Extracellular trap formation from eosinophils appears to fulfill an important immune response against extracellular pathogens, although overproduction of traps is evident in pathologies. Here, we discuss the discovery and characterization of eosinophil extracellular traps (EETs) in response to a variety of stimuli, and suggest a role for these structures in the pathogenesis of disease as well as the establishment of autoimmunity in chronic, unresolved inflammation.

This substudy was funded by AstraZeneca and AllerGen NCE. AstraZeneca and AllerGen NCE did not have any role in the design and conduct of the substudy, interpretation of data, or preparation of the early drafts of the manuscript. Editorial support, including editing and submission of the manuscript, was funded by AstraZeneca. All authors had full access to all data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Airway inflammation is considered to be the primary component contributing to the heterogeneity and severity of airway disorders. Therapeutic efficacies of diverse novel biologics targeting the inflammatory pathways are under investigation. One such target is IL-5, a type-1 cytokine that is central to the initiation and sustenance of eosinophilic airway inflammation. Over the past decade, anti-IL5 molecules have been documented to have mixed therapeutic benefits in asthmatics. Post hoc analyses of the trials reiterate the importance of identifying the IL-5-responsive patient endotypes. In fact, the currently available anti-IL5 treatments are being considered beyond asthma management; especially in clinical complications with an underlying eosinophilic pathobiology such as hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) and eosinophilic granulomatosis and polyangitis (EGPA). In addition, closer analyses of the available data indicate alternative mechanisms of tissue eosinophilia that remain uncurbed with the current dosage and delivery platform of the anti-IL5 molecules.

No abstract