Rhodamine B (RB) is a popular bait-marking tool in wildlife research, although its use has required many assumptions about marking reliability. These assumptions have limited dosage ranges and detection methods in research applications. Identification of alternate detection methods, hair types, and dosage rates could create new opportunities for RB use and potentially reduce adverse effects on target animals. We examined the relationship between hair types, dosage rate, and detection method for RB applications using black rats (Rattus rattus) in laboratory settings. We gave study animals varying doses of RB, and examined vibrissae and guard hairs for the detection of RB bands using ambient light, ultraviolet (UV) light, and fluorescence microscopy techniques. Fluorescence microscopy detected more RB marked hairs than UV light or ambient light. Fluorescence microscopy was more sensitive to RB dose rate detection; with receiver operating characteristic curves suggesting that the minimum dose rates at which RB intake can be correctly detected are 3.9 and 33 mg/kg for vibrissae and guard hairs, respectively. Guard hair RB detection was less reliable under ambient light and UV lamps, but equally detectable as vibrissae under fluorescence microscopy. Our results confirmed the interrelationship between dosage and detection methods in the efficacy of bait markers. We demonstrated that guard hairs can be a reliable hair type for the detection of RB. This application is less invasive than sampling animal tissues to detect bait uptake. ß 2012 The Wildlife Society.
Context Bait palatability is a key issue influencing the uptake of toxic baits or non-toxic bait markers. Animals often reject baits with high concentrations of the active compound (whether it is a toxin, vaccine or marker) because of poor palatability, thus reducing the efficacy of baiting. Foraging theory predicts that palatability will be affected not only by the taste of active ingredients in bait but also by an animal’s ability to access alternative foods. Yet few studies of bait palatability are measured in the context of an animal’s need to search and forage for other food types. Aims The present study examined whether the palatability of Rhodamine B (RB) baits for black rats (Rattus rattus) was affected when foraging constraints were placed on access to alternative food compared with when alternative food was freely accessible. Rhodamine B is a bait marker and was used as a surrogate for other active ingredients likely to be used in pest control management. Methods Each day, RB bait at one of four concentrations was provided to an individual rat along with an alternative food that was either freely available (spatially clumped with foraging constraints absent) or hidden within a matrix of tubes (spatially scattered, thus with foraging constraints present). Key results Black rats exhibited a gradient in how palatable they found RB and preferred baits that contained the lowest concentrations of RB. Importantly, RB baits were more palatable when access to alternative food was made more difficult by applying a foraging constraint. In particular, a 0.2% RB concentration appeared to represent a threshold in palatability where intake at or above this concentration was significantly affected by a rat’s ability to freely access alternative foods. The ingestion of RB dye (mg kg–1) was highest in rats that consumed the highest concentrations, even though food intake was reduced. Conclusions The consumption of baits at high RB concentrations was greatly affected by the ease of access to other foods. We suggest the willingness of the animal to consume the bait can be influenced by the effort needed to find alternative foods. Implications A higher incidence of marking in the whiskers or hair of target individuals in the field will only be achieved with the use of the most palatable concentrations of RB and environments providing low alternative food access and abundance. A trade-off between reliable marking and palatability of RB at varying concentrations must be achieved if actual bait uptake in the field is to be more accurately represented. A re-evaluation of palatability experiments may be required as access to alternative foods can have profound impacts on bait uptake.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.