No abstract

Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article .

Objectives To compare spinal bone measures derived from automatic and manual assessment in routine CT with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in their association with prevalent osteoporotic vertebral fractures using our fully automated framework (https://anduin.bonescreen.de) to assess various bone measures in clinical CT. Methods We included 192 patients (141 women, 51 men; age 70.2 ± 9.7 years) who had lumbar DXA and CT available (within 1 year). Automatic assessment of spinal bone measures in CT included segmentation of vertebrae using a convolutional neural network (CNN), reduction to the vertebral body, and extraction of bone mineral content (BMC), trabecular and integral volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), and CT-based areal BMD (aBMD) using asynchronous calibration. Moreover, trabecular bone was manually sampled (manual vBMD). Results A total of 148 patients (77%) had vertebral fractures and significantly lower values in all bone measures compared to patients without fractures (p ≤ 0.001). Except for BMC, all CT-based measures performed significantly better as predictors for vertebral fractures compared to DXA (e.g., AUC = 0.885 for trabecular vBMD and AUC = 0.86 for integral vBMD vs. AUC = 0.668 for DXA aBMD, respectively; both p < 0.001). Age- and sex-adjusted associations with fracture status were strongest for manual vBMD (OR = 7.3, [95%] CI 3.8–14.3) followed by automatically assessed trabecular vBMD (OR = 6.9, CI 3.5–13.4) and integral vBMD (OR = 4.3, CI 2.5–7.6). Diagnostic cutoffs of integral vBMD for osteoporosis (< 160 mg/cm3) or low bone mass (160 ≤ BMD < 190 mg/cm3) had sensitivity (84%/41%) and specificity (78%/95%) similar to trabecular vBMD. Conclusions Fully automatic osteoporosis screening in routine CT of the spine is feasible. CT-based measures can better identify individuals with reduced bone mass who suffered from vertebral fractures than DXA. Key Points • Opportunistic osteoporosis screening of spinal bone measures derived from clinical routine CT is feasible in a fully automatic fashion using a deep learning-driven framework (https://anduin.bonescreen.de). • Manually sampled volumetric BMD (vBMD) and automatically assessed trabecular and integral vBMD were the best predictors for prevalent vertebral fractures. • Except for bone mineral content, all CT-based bone measures performed significantly better than DXA-based measures. • We introduce diagnostic thresholds of integral vBMD for osteoporosis (< 160 mg/cm3) and low bone mass (160 ≤ BMD < 190 mg/cm3) with almost equal sensitivity and specificity compared to conventional thresholds of quantitative CT as proposed by the American College of Radiology (osteoporosis < 80 mg/cm3).

Objectives To determine the correlation between cervicothoracic and lumbar volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) in an average cohort of adults and to identify specific diagnostic thresholds for the cervicothoracic spine on the individual subject level. Methods In this HIPPA–compliant study, we retrospectively included 260 patients (59.7 ± 18.3 years, 105 women), who received a contrast-enhanced or non-contrast-enhanced CT scan. vBMD was extracted using an automated pipeline (https://anduin.bonescreen.de). The association of vBMD between each vertebra spanning C2–T12 and the averaged values at the lumbar spine (L1–L3) was analyzed before and after semiquantitative assessment of fracture status and degeneration, and respective vertebra-specific cut-off values for osteoporosis were calculated using linear regression. Results In both women and men, trabecular vBMD decreased with age in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar regions. vBMD values of cervicothoracic vertebrae showed strong correlations with lumbar vertebrae (L1–L3), with a median Pearson value of r = 0.87 (range: rC2 = 0.76 to rT12 = 0.96). The correlation coefficients were significantly lower (p < 0.0001) without excluding fractured and degenerated vertebrae, median r = 0.82 (range: rC2 = 0.69 to rT12 = 0.93). Respective cut-off values for osteoporosis peaked at C4 (209.2 mg/ml) and decreased to 83.8 mg/ml at T12. Conclusion Our data show a high correlation between clinically used mean L1–L3 values and vBMD values elsewhere in the spine, independent of age. The proposed cut-off values for the cervicothoracic spine therefore may allow the determination of low bone mass even in clinical cases where only parts of the spine are imaged. Key Points vBMD of all cervicothoracic vertebrae showed strong correlation with lumbar vertebrae (L1–L3), with a median Pearson’s correlation coefficient of r = 0.87 (range: rC2 = 0.76 to rT12 = 0.96). The correlation coefficients were significantly lower (p < 0.0001) without excluding fractured and moderate to severely degenerated vertebrae, median r = 0.82 (range: rC2 = 0.69 to rT12 = 0.93). We postulate that trabecular vBMD < 200 mg/ml for the cervical spine and < 100 mg/ml for the thoracic spine are strong indicators of osteoporosis, similar to < 80 mg/ml at the lumbar spine.

With the advent of deep learning algorithms, fully automated radiological image analysis is within reach. In spine imaging, several atlas- and shape-based as well as deep learning segmentation algorithms have been proposed, allowing for subsequent automated analysis of morphology and pathology. The first “Large Scale Vertebrae Segmentation Challenge” (VerSe 2019) showed that these perform well on normal anatomy, but fail in variants not frequently present in the training dataset. Building on that experience, we report on the largely increased VerSe 2020 dataset and results from the second iteration of the VerSe challenge (MICCAI 2020, Lima, Peru). VerSe 2020 comprises annotated spine computed tomography (CT) images from 300 subjects with 4142 fully visualized and annotated vertebrae, collected across multiple centres from four different scanner manufacturers, enriched with cases that exhibit anatomical variants such as enumeration abnormalities (n = 77) and transitional vertebrae (n = 161). Metadata includes vertebral labelling information, voxel-level segmentation masks obtained with a human-machine hybrid algorithm and anatomical ratings, to enable the development and benchmarking of robust and accurate segmentation algorithms.

Objectives To determine the accuracy of an artificial neural network (ANN) for fully automated detection of the presence and phase of iodinated contrast agent in routine abdominal multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scans and evaluate the effect of contrast correction for osteoporosis screening. Methods This HIPPA-compliant study retrospectively included 579 MDCT scans in 193 patients (62.4 ± 14.6 years, 48 women). Three different ANN models (2D DenseNet with random slice selection, 2D DenseNet with anatomy-guided slice selection, 3D DenseNet) were trained in 462 MDCT scans of 154 patients (threefold cross-validation), who underwent triphasic CT. All ANN models were tested in 117 unseen triphasic scans of 39 patients, as well as in a public MDCT dataset containing 311 patients. In the triphasic test scans, trabecular volumetric bone mineral density (BMD) was calculated using a fully automated pipeline. Root-mean-square errors (RMSE) of BMD measurements with and without correction for contrast application were calculated in comparison to nonenhanced (NE) scans. Results The 2D DenseNet with anatomy-guided slice selection outperformed the competing models and achieved an F1 score of 0.98 and an accuracy of 98.3% in the test set (public dataset: F1 score 0.93; accuracy 94.2%). Application of contrast agent resulted in significant BMD biases (all p < .001; portal-venous (PV): RMSE 18.7 mg/ml, mean difference 17.5 mg/ml; arterial (AR): RMSE 6.92 mg/ml, mean difference 5.68 mg/ml). After the fully automated correction, this bias was no longer significant (p > .05; PV: RMSE 9.45 mg/ml, mean difference 1.28 mg/ml; AR: RMSE 3.98 mg/ml, mean difference 0.94 mg/ml). Conclusion Automatic detection of the contrast phase in multicenter CT data was achieved with high accuracy, minimizing the contrast-induced error in BMD measurements. Key Points • A 2D DenseNet with anatomy-guided slice selection achieved an F1 score of 0.98 and an accuracy of 98.3% in the test set. In a public dataset, an F1 score of 0.93 and an accuracy of 94.2% were obtained. • Automated adjustment for contrast injection improved the accuracy of lumbar bone mineral density measurements (RMSE 18.7 mg/ml vs. 9.45 mg/ml respectively, in the portal-venous phase). • An artificial neural network can reliably reveal the presence and phase of iodinated contrast agent in multidetector CT scans (https://github.com/ferchonavarro/anatomy_guided_contrast_c). This allows minimizing the contrast-induced error in opportunistic bone mineral density measurements.

Opportunistic osteoporosis screening in nondedicated routine computed tomography (CT) is of increasing importance. The purpose of this study was to compare lumbar volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) assessed by a convolutional neural network (CNN)‐based framework in routine CT to vBMD from dedicated quantitative CT (QCT), and to evaluate the ability of vBMD and surrogate measurements of Hounsfield units (HU) to distinguish between patients with and without osteoporotic vertebral fractures (VFs). A total of 144 patients (median age: 70.7 years, 93 females) with clinical routine CT (eight different CT scanners, 120 kVp or 140 kVp, with and without intravenous contrast medium) and dedicated QCT acquired within ≤30 days were included. Vertebral measurements included (i) vBMD from the CNN‐based approach including automated vertebral body labeling, segmentation, and correction of the contrast media phase for routine CT data (vBMD_OPP), (ii) vBMD from dedicated QCT (vBMD_QCT), and (iii) noncalibrated HU from vertebral bodies of routine CT data as previously proposed for immanent opportunistic osteoporosis screening based on CT attenuation. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for vBMD_QCT versus vBMD_OPP indicated better agreement (ICC = 0.913) than the ICC for vBMD_QCT versus noncalibrated HU (ICC = 0.704). Bland‐Altman analysis showed data points from 137 patients (95.1%) within the limits of agreement (LOA) of −23.2 to 25.0 mg/cm3 for vBMD_QCT versus vBMD_OPP. Osteoporosis (vBMD <80 mg/cm3) was detected in 89 patients (vBMD_QCT) and 88 patients (vBMD_OPP), whereas no patient crossed the diagnostic thresholds from normal vBMD to osteoporosis or vice versa. In a subcohort of 88 patients (thoracolumbar spine covered by imaging for VF reading), 69 patients showed one or more prevalent VFs, and the performance for discrimination between patients with and without VFs was best for vBMD_OPP (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.862; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.771–0.953). In conclusion, automated opportunistic osteoporosis screening in routine CT of various scanner setups is feasible and may demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy for prevalent VFs. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

No abstract