BACKGROUND Nonmelanoma skin cancer is the most common cancer in the United States with significant quality of life impact. OBJECTIVE To assess the utility of a highly immersive virtual reality (VR) experience in the context of outpatient skin cancer surgery as a means to minimize patient-reported feelings of anxiety or pain. The authors also sought to assess the effects on patient-reported overall satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients completed a pre-VR experience survey after completion of their first Mohs surgery layer, followed by a 10-minute VR experience, and a post-VR experience survey. Differences in the pre-VR survey and post-VR survey were compared using the chi-square test. The anxiety scores were compared using a t-test. RESULTS In all but 2 questions, there was a trend toward improvement of the anxiety-related sensations after completion of the VR experience. There were statistically significant differences for 4 questions: “Are you currently feeling unable to relax” (p = .0013), “are you currently feeling fear of the worst happening” (p < .0001), “are you currently feeling terrified or afraid” (p = .0046), and “are you currently feeling nervous” (p < .0001). CONCLUSION Virtual reality experiences during the Mohs surgical day significantly improved measures of anxiety and patient satisfaction.
Background Current studies report mixed results in health status and health behaviors after a diagnosis of cancer. The aim of our study is to investigate potential differences in lifestyle factors among cancer survivors and cancer-free individuals in a prospective cohort study conducted in the United States. Methods Using data from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Trial, 10,133 cancer survivors were identified and compared to 81,992 participants without cancer to evaluate differences in body mass index (BMI), smoking, NSAID use, and physical activity. Results Cancer survivors, compared to the cancer-free, were significantly less likely to engage in physical activity (odds ratio (OR) = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.77–0.88). Compared to those who were obese at baseline, cancer survivors were more likely to be at normal BMI at follow-up compared to the cancer-free (OR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.42–2.54). Cancer survivors were less likely to report regular aspirin use as compared to the cancer-free population (OR = 0.86, 95 % CI = 0.82–0.92). Of the current smokers, cancer survivors were more likely to be former smokers at follow-up compared to the cancer-free (OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.30–1.74). Conclusion Upon stratification by baseline health markers, cancer survivors practice healthier lifestyle habits such as smoking cessation and maintenance of a healthy weight. However, cancer survivors are less likely to be physically active as compared to cancer-free individuals, regardless of baseline practices. Implications for cancer survivors For cancer survivors who reported poor health status and behaviors at baseline, a cancer diagnosis may encourage the practice of healthier lifestyle behaviors.
In this issue of Cancer, Kehm et al 1 report on racial and ethnic differences in childhood cancer survival and quantify how socioeconomic status (SES) mediates these disparities. They show that SES accounts for 28% to 73% of racial and ethnic disparities for several childhood cancers, including acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), neuroblastoma, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. In addition, the authors note that there are still statistically significant racial and ethnic disparities in survival independent of SES, the sources of which remain unclear. Both of these statements represent important steps in the understanding of childhood cancer disparities; they are at once calls for further work to improve our understanding of inequalities as well as opportunities to address them. In this editorial, we explore the epidemiologic challenges of understanding social determinants of childhood cancer survival, specifically those concerning racial and ethnic disparities, and we discuss future directions for increasing health equity for childhood cancer patients.There is resounding evidence that social factors, including race, ethnicity, and SES, are associated with disparities in cancer survival. 2,3 The current study makes important progress in deconvoluting these different factors while also highlighting the challenges of these efforts. Large databases such as the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database provide powerful evidence that is widely generalizable and not prone to selection and survival biases. 4,5 Compared with clinical trials, this population-based study provides a better opportunity for understanding possible differences in racial and ethnic populations, which are often underrepresented in clinical trials. 4,6 However, there are some distinct limitations to consider with the SES classification in the SEER database. Because it is an ecological variable rather than an individual-level determination, there may be significant measurement error or misclassification of individuals, which may bias the socioeconomic effect toward the null 7,8 ; therefore, its contribution to disparities may be underestimated. Because individuals are uniformly labeled, variations in education, income, and occupation within the area-based grouping will not be detectable. The individuals who are worst off and in turn may have the worst survival outcomes will not be identified. Previous research has shown large variability between area-based and household incomes. 9 Consortium trials may provide a balance between collecting individual data and being widely generalizable, but requiring access to advanced centers may limit the generalizability to geographically or economically isolated populations. Furthermore, with the adjustment of the SES status, there is the risk of residual confounding stemming from the broadness of the SES grouping parameters and errors in the classification of SES grouping. 10 A more comprehensive analysis of health insurance status, rather than the crude measure used in th...
113 Background: In the United States, colorectal cancer is the fourth most common cancer and one of the leading causes of cancer death. Few studies have examined the relationship between colorectal cancer survivorship and long-term cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Methods: Individuals diagnosed with colorectal cancer were identified using the Utah Population Database. For a comparison group, up to 5 cancer-free individuals were matched by birth year, birth state, follow-up time and sex to each cancer case. For individuals with > 10 years of follow-up, we estimated CVD risk > 10 years after cancer diagnosis. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% Confidence Intervals. Results: Among 1,749 colorectal cancer survivors who had survived for at least 10 years, 1,001 (57.2%) were diagnosed with CVD > 10 years after cancer diagnosis. Compared to the general population, colorectal cancer survivors had an increased risk of CVD > 10 years after cancer diagnosis: HR = 2.84 (95% CI = 2.59, 3.11) for hypertension; HR = 2.66 (95% CI 2.37, 2.98) for diseases of the heart; HR = 3.91 (95% CI = 3.33, 4.58) for diseases of the arteries, arterioles and capillaries; HR = 2.58 (95% CI = 2.46, 2.99) for diseases of the veins and lymphatics; HR = 2.98 (95% CI = 2.36, 3.76) for cerebrovascular disease. Colorectal cancer survivors with ≥1 comorbidity had an increased risk of CVD > 10 years after cancer diagnosis compared to survivors with no comorbidities (HR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.49, 1.95). Colorectal cancer survivors who were ≥65 years had an increased risk of CVD > 10 years after cancer diagnosis. Colorectal cancer survivors who were obese at the time of diagnosis had an increased risk of CVD > 10 years after cancer diagnosis when compared to survivors with normal BMIs (HR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.06, 1.49). Conclusions: Compared to the general population, colorectal cancer survivors had an increased risk of CVD during the > 10 year follow-up period. Within colorectal cancer survivors, there was an increased risk of CVD for those that were older, had ≥1 comorbidity and were obese. The increased risk of CVD among survivors may be attributable to the lifestyle risk factors shared by colorectal cancer and CVD.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.