Background:Borago officinalis and its derivatives are used in folk medicine to treat asthma because of its special effect on allergic disorders. It suppresses the tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and delivers gamma-linolenic acid. The objective of this clinical trial was to determine the effect of Borago officinalis on clinical and physiological findings in moderate persistent asthma.Materials and Methods:This prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial was conducted on patients aged 15–90 years with moderate asthma and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 60–79% of predicted who presented to a sub-specialty clinic of pulmonary medicine. We randomly allocated subjects to receive either Borago extract (5 mL three times a day) or a matched placebo for one month. The primary outcome was the asthma control test (ACT) score and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) test. Secondary outcomes included clinical findings, spirometry, and sputum cytology including inflammatory cells.Results:Thirty-eight subjects with a mean age of 46.8±15.3 years and mean duration of asthma of 71±103 months were enrolled in our study. Cough, dyspnea, wheezing, nocturnal symptoms, and airway hyper-responsiveness reduced significantly in the Borago group after the treatment and ACT scores improved significantly (10.8±5.26 before and 15.4±5.12 after the trial). Flare up of asthma and emergency department visits in the Borago group also decreased significantly (3.6±2.33 to 2±1.86 flare ups per month and 0.62±0.9 to 0.05±0.23 for emergency department visits per month). Physiological parameters including spirometry, FENO, and sputum cytology including eosinophil and neutrophil did not change significantly.Conclusion:Borago improved the clinical findings of asthma, but it was not able to suppress the inflammation involved in asthma.
Some patients suffer from clinical symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) but their pulmonary function tests are in the normal range (at risk group). The objective of this study was to discover a practical test to distinguish these patients from non-COPD subjects. A total of 77 subjects including 40 COPD patients, 37 subjects at risk for developing COPD, and 32 control subjects were entered in this study. The accuracy of maximal-mid expiratory flow (MMEF)/forced vital capacity (FVC) for the diagnosis of COPD in at risk patients and its capability to differentiate from early COPD and normal patients were evaluated. Body plethysmography was used for measurement of lung volume as the Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease standard. MMEF/FVC in the at risk group of COPD (0.73 + 0.19) was significantly lower than the normal control group (0.9 + 0.24, respectively), and also, it was significantly higher than the COPD group (0.31 + 0.17). There was significant correlation between the MMEF/FVC and amount of smoking measured by pack year (r 2 ¼ 0.112, p ¼ 0.005) and stages of COPD (Spearman's r ¼ 0.82, p ¼ 0.0001). Early stage COPD (smoker subjects without spirometry derangement) can be diagnosed by MMEF/FVC. Using this tool we may be able to detect this highly preventable disease at an earlier stage.
Background: The lung is one of the most exposable organs to chemical warfare agents such as sulfur mustard gas. Pulmonary complications as a result of this gas range from severe bronchial stenosis to mild or no symptoms. Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) which is usually assessed as response to inhaled methacholine is the most characteristic feature of asthma. AHR is reported in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients and smokers, and may also show in chemical warfare victims. However, there are little reports regarding AHR in chemical warfare victims. Objective: Therefore, in this study, airway responsiveness to methacholine in victims of chemical warfare was examined. Methods: The threshold concentrations of inhaled methacholine required for a 20% change in forced expiratory flow in 1 s (FEV1; PC20) or a 35% change in specific airway conductance (PC35) were measured in 15 chemical war victims and 15 normal control subjects. Results: In 10 out of 15 chemical warfare victims (two thirds), PC20 and PC35 methacholine could be measured and subjects were called responders. AHR to methacholine in responder chemical war victims (PC20 = 0.41 and PC35 = 0.82 g/l) was significantly lower than in normal subjects (PC20 = 5.69 and PC35 = 4.60 g/l, p < 0.001 for both cases). There was a significant correlation between FEV1 and PC20 methacholine (r = 0.688, p < 0.001). The correlations between PC20 and PC35 were statistically significant as well (r = 0.856, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Results showed increased airway responsiveness of most chemical warfare victims to methacholine which correlated with the FEV1 value and which may be related to chronic airway inflammation or irreversible airway changes.
Asthma is a common respiratory disease characterized by airway inflammation, airway hyperreactivity, and reversible airflow obstruction. Despite current treatments, the prevalence of asthma has increased markedly over decades. According to the theories proposed to explain the pathophysiology of autoimmune diseases in integrative medicine, leaky gut syndrome is a phenomenon of increased intestinal permeability due to the disruption of tight junctions and is thought to be related to many chronic diseases, such as food intolerance, inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis, asthma, and other autoimmune disease. One of the classical approaches used by integrative physicians to treat leaky gut syndrome is to repair intestinal permeability to prevent allergic cascade. Due to several mechanisms that have been mentioned in the protective effects of plant gums and plantain family seeds on the intestinal epithelium, we can propose an effective management for leaky gut syndrome to treat asthma.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.