Objective: Repeat adolescent pregnancy is a hot topic worldwide and imposes a challenge on the health system, especially when faced with limited resources. We aimed to assess maternal and neonatal outcomes in adolescent pregnant women with one prior cesarean section (CS). Material and Methods: Singleton adolescent pregnant women with one prior CS scar were recruited and divided into two groups based on the obstetric decision for delivery and/or mother’s wish, either trial of labor (TL) or elective cesarean section (ECS). If TL failed, an emergency CS was performed. Results: Out of the total 109 involved women, TL and ECS groups included 78 (71.6%) and 31 (28.4%) women, respectively. Emergency CS was done for 57 (52.3%) women from the TL group, leaving only 21 (19.3%) women with successful TL who had statistically significant (non-recurrent) indications of the prior CS [12 (57.1%)]. Malpresentation (n=24; 77.4%) was the major indication in the ECS group, while fetal distress (n=29; 50.9%) was the main cause of failed TL. Total maternal morbidities in the TL group were significantly higher for adjusted [1.5 (1.1-4.2)] and non-adjusted odds ratios (OR) [2.4 (1.6-5.6)]. Neonatal complications, such as admission to neonatal intensive care unit, were higher in the TL group without reaching significance. However, the adjusted OR [1.9 (1.1-3.3)] for perinatal asphyxia was significantly increased in TL group. Conclusion: Maternal morbidities and perinatal asphyxia were significantly higher in the TL group of adolescent women compared with the ECS group in this study.
Objectives: Teenage pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) offers a real challenge to the health system and needs a special care. We aimed to evaluate possible obstetrical and neonatal adverse events of different treatment protocols in adolescent GDM including lifestyle, metformin (MTF), and insulin. Methods: All teen pregnant women ≤ 19 years old visiting Baghdad Teaching Hospital throughout four years (from June 1, 2016 till May 31, 2020) diagnosed with GDM were included in this cohort study and followed-up closely throughout pregnancy and after delivery. Included adolescents were put on lifestyle alone during the first week of presentation. Adolescents who reached target glucose measurements were categorized into lifestyle group, while other adolescents were randomly allocated into MTF and insulin groups. Also, adolescent pregnant women without GDM were recruited as control group using computer randomization. Results: The GDM (110 cases) and control (121 individuals) groups had matched general features at recruitment except for diabetes family history. Also, GDM treatment groups had matched features. Glycemic readings (fasting and random) was significantly (p< 0.05) higher in insulin group having odds ratio (OR) of 1.41, and 1.57, respectively. In MTF group, significant protective OR was found in preeclampsia (OR=0.76, p< 0.05). MTF showed non-significant protective OR regarding prematurity and five minutes Apgar score>7 [(OR=0.83, p=0.24), and (OR=0.94, p=0.73), respectively], and significant protective association with large for gestational age and admission to neonatal intensive unit. Insulin had significantly higher prematurity, small for gestational age, and hypoglycemia [OR=1.89, 2.53, and 2.84, respectively]. Conclusion: Metformin (MTF) showed less pregnancy and neonatal complications in adolescent GDM than insulin and lifestyle. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.4.3966 How to cite this:Jasim SK, Al-Momen H, Wahbi MA. Treatment options of Adolescent Gestational Diabetes: Effect on Outcome. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(4):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.4.3966 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.