Background
This study examined the prevalence and predictors of complementary and alternative medicine use among clinic patients with hypertension and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus in western Jamaica.
Methods
A cross-sectional study using an investigator-administered questionnaire was conducted from May to August 2017. Data on sociodemographic factors, complementary and alternative medicine use, and knowledge and perceptions of complementary and alternative medicine were collected from the patients. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine associations between patient characteristics and knowledge and perceptions of complementary and alternative medicine and complementary and alternative medicine use.
Results
A total of 362 patients were invited to participate and 345 (95.3%) completed the questionnaire; 311 (90.1%) had hypertension, 130 (37.7%) had type 2 diabetes mellitus and 96 (27.8%) had both diseases. Seventy-nine percent of the participants with hypertension and 65% with type 2 diabetes mellitus reported current use of complementary and alternative medicine. Self-reported knowledge of complementary and alternative medicine (none/poor vs average/good/excellent) was significantly associated with complementary and alternative medicine use for hypertension (AOR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.13–0.87) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (AOR = 0.06, 95% CI = 0.01–0.37). Believing that complementary and alternative medicine is a natural method for treating hypertension was significantly associated with complementary and alternative medicine use among patients with hypertension (AOR = 3.9, 95% CI = 1.26–12.00), and belief that it is acceptable to use prescription medication and complementary and alternative medicine simultaneously was significantly associated with complementary and alternative medicine use among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (AOR =7.19, CI = 1.34–38.52).
Conclusions
Participants’ perceptions of their knowledge and beliefs regarding complementary and alternative medicine strongly influence their use of complementary and alternative medicine. These findings can be used in designing educational interventions to promote the proper use, and mitigate detrimental effects, of complementary and alternative medicine in this population.
Background:
The Alabama Quality Management Group (AQMG), a consortium of 9 Ryan White–funded part C and D clinics, distributed statewide was established in 2006 under the guidance from the Health and Resources Services Administration with a clinical quality improvement (CQI) focus.
Methods:
We describe the origins and evolution of the AQMG, including requisite shifts from aggregate clinic-wide to de-identified individual-level data reporting for implementation of the Data for Care (D4C-AL) Alabama program. The D4C-AL strategy uses a clinic-wide risk stratification of all patients based on missed clinic visits in the previous 12 months. Intermediate (1–2 missed visits) and high-risk patients (>3 missed visits) receive the evidence-informed Retention through Enhanced Personal Contact intervention. We report on a pilot of the D4CAL program in 4 of 33 primary HIV care clinics at the UAB 1917 Clinic.
Results:
Among 3859 patients seen between April 2018 and February 2019, the missed visit rate was not significantly different between the D4C-1917 (19.2%) and non-D4C clinics (20.5%) in a preintervention period (May 2017–April 2018). However, a significantly lower missed visit rate was observed in the D4C-1917 vs. non–D4C-1917 clinics during the intervention period (April 2018–February 2019, P = 0.049).
Conclusions:
The AQMG has been transformed into a health service research and implementation science platform, building on a shared vision, mission, data reporting, and quality improvement focus. Moreover, CQI may be viewed as an implementation strategy that seeks to enhance uptake and sustained use of effective interventions with D4C-AL representing a prototype for future initiatives embedded within extant quality improvement consortia.
Reduced growth and delayed maturation have been described in children with sickle cell disease (SCD). This study investigated growth and hemolysis in children with SCD in the DISPLACE (Dissemination and Implementation of Stroke Prevention Looking at the Care Environment) cohort. The database includes 5287 children, of which, 3305 had at least 2 growth measurements over a 5-year period. Body mass index was converted to z-scores (zBMI), and 19.8%, 66.1%, 14.2% of children were classified as underweight, normal, and overweight/obese, respectively. Multivariable analysis of growth was conducted and included variables: age, sex, blood pressure, hemoglobin, reticulocyte count, treatment with chronic red cell transfusion therapy (CRCT), or hydroxyurea therapy. Baseline hemoglobin levels were associated with the lower odds of being underweight (odds ratio [OR] = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.86-0.99), and higher odds of being overweight/obese (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.17-1.36) compared with normal zBMI. CRCT was associated with being overweight/obese at baseline (OR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.31-2.60). Overall, results showed that children who were underweight improved regardless of therapy over the 2-year time period. However, children on CRCT are at higher risk for being overweight and should be monitored closely.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.