Background: Sepsis is a major reason for intensive care unit (ICU) admission, also in resource-poor settings. ICUs in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) face many challenges that could affect patient outcome. Aim: To describe differences between resource-poor and resource-rich settings regarding the epidemiology, pathophysiology, economics and research aspects of sepsis. We restricted this manuscript to the ICU setting even knowing that many sepsis patients in LMICs are treated outside an ICU. Findings: Although many bacterial pathogens causing sepsis in LMICs are similar to those in high-income countries, resistance patterns to antimicrobial drugs can be very different; in addition, causes of sepsis in LMICs often include tropical diseases in which direct damaging effects of pathogens and their products can sometimes be more important than the response of the host. There are substantial and persisting differences in ICU capacities around the world; not surprisingly the lowest capacities are found in LMICs, but with important heterogeneity within individual LMICs. Although many aspects of sepsis management developed in rich countries are applicable in LMICs, implementation requires strong consideration of cost implications and the important differences in resources. Conclusions: Addressing both disease-specific and setting-specific factors is important to improve performance of ICUs in LMICs. Although critical care for severe sepsis is likely cost-effective in LMIC setting, more detailed evaluation at both at a macro-and micro-economy level is necessary. Sepsis management in resource-limited settings is a largely unexplored frontier with important opportunities for research, training, and other initiatives for improvement.
IntroductionAnti-NMDA receptor encephalitis is increasingly recognised as an important differential diagnosis in patients with encephalitis of unknown aetiology. We report the first case series of patients diagnosed in Vietnam.MethodsSamples of CSF from patients with presumed encephalitis but negative microbiological investigations, who exhibited dyskinesia, autonomic instability or psychosis were tested for antibodies against the NR1 subunit of the glutamate (type-NMDA) receptor using an indirect immunofluorescence assay.ResultsOf 99 patients admitted with all-cause encephalitis over an 18 month period, 9.1% (n = 9 patients, 5 female, median age 28 years) had confirmed NMDAR encephalitis. All patients were admitted from one mental health hospital, and the incidence may therefore be an underestimate. Common features included reduction in speech (n = 9), catatonia (n = 9), convulsions (n = 7), dyskinesia (n = 9), rigidity (n = 9) and autonomic dysfunction (n = 7). Aside from a modest lymphocytic pleocytosis, routine CSF analysis was usually normal. No female patient had ovarian teratoma detected by abdominal ultrasound. Most patients were treated with high dose corticosteroids, and one patient received intravenous immunoglobulin. The median duration of hospitalization was 75 days and no patient died during admission.ConclusionsAnti-NMDA receptor encephalitis is an important differential diagnosis to consider for patients presenting with acute onset psychiatric symptoms, who develop ensuing seizures, movement or autonomic disorder in Vietnam. A stronger evidence base for management and access to second line immunotherapy agents may help to reduce morbidity from this disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.