In overall, our studied multistrain probiotic compound has not beneficial effects in the treatment of H. pylori infection. It might be related to the low dosage of our probiotic regimen and/or high frequency of upper gastrointestinal adverse effects which in turn could decrease the eradication efficacy.
Background and study aim: Diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is uncomfortable for most patients. We determined the efficacy of alprazolam, administered orally or sublingually, as premedication for sedation during EGD.
Patients and methods: Adult EGD candidates were randomly allocated to four groups (n?=?55, each group) and received alprazolam (0.5?mg) sublingually or orally, placebo sublingually or orally at 30 minutes before EGD. Main outcome measures included procedure-related anxiety and pain/discomfort (assessed using 11-point numeric scales), patient overall tolerance (assessed using a 4-point Likert scale), need for intravenous sedation, and willingness to repeat the EGD if necessary.
Results: Patients experienced greater reduction in anxiety score after medication with sublingual alprazolam (mean 2.25, standard deviation [SD] 1.73) compared with sublingual placebo (mean 0.10, standard error [SE] 0.15]; P?0.001) and oral alprazolam (0.63, SE 0.14; P?0.001). Also, pain/discomfort scores were lower with sublingual alprazolam compared with sublingual placebo (3.29, SE 0.29 vs. 4.16, SD 1.86; P?=?0.024), and with oral alprazolam compared with oral placebo (3.48, SD 1.69 vs. 5.13, SD 2.39; P ?0.001). Patient overall tolerance was better with sublingual alprazolam than with sublingual placebo (P?=?0.005) or with oral alprazolam (P?=?0.009). Regarding intravenous sedation, there was no difference between sublingual alprazolam and sublingual placebo (10.9?% vs. 10.9?%; P?=?0.619) or between oral alprazolam and oral placebo (9.0?% vs. 12.7?%; P?=?0.381). Willingness to repeat the procedure was greater with sublingual alprazolam than with sublingual placebo (50.9?% vs. 30.9?%; P?=?0.026).
Conclusions: Sublingual alprazolam is an effective premedication for sedation during EGD. It reduces anxiety and pain/discomfort related to EGD and increases patient tolerance and willingness to repeat the EGD if necessary.
Clinical trial registration: NCT01949038 ClinicalTrials.gov
Background:Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), defined as excessive liver fat deposition and one of end-stage liver disease causes. Increased ferritin levels are associated with insulin resistance and a higher hepatic iron and fat content. Hyperferritinemia has been associated with severity of liver damage in NAFLD. The study aimed to evaluate the effects of phlebotomy on liver enzymes and histology in such patients.Materials and Methods:Thirty-two eligible patients who had NAFLD and after 6 months of lifestyle modification still had NAFLD, and whose ferritin serum was above 250 mg/dl, were enrolled in this clinical trial study. After written informed consent was obtained, each patient's blood serum was taken for aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALK-P), complete blood count (CBC), total iron-binding capacity (TIBC), iron, and ferritin. Then the patients underwent liver biopsy. After that patients underwent phlebotomy, giving 350 cc blood monthly. Before every phlebotomy, hemoglobin and ferritin were checked. If they were in the goal range, phlebotomy was discontinued and the patient underwent liver biopsy. A serum sample was taken for testing at the beginning of the study. The results before and after phlebotomy were compared. The maximum duration of the study was 6 months.Results:Thirty-two patients (26 males and 6 females) were enrolled, and the mean average age was 33.7 ± 6.74 years. Phlebotomy improved liver enzymes and histology of liver significantly (P < 0.001) and induced reduction of ferritin.Conclusion:Phlebotomy is effective for the improvement of liver enzymes and histology in patients with NAFLD and hyperferritinemia.
Purpose
Today, coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) treatment is an evolving process, and synbiotic administration has been suggested as a new therapeutic strategy. This study aims to investigate the effect of synbiotic supplementation in COVID-19 patients.
Design/methodology/approach
In this placebo-controlled trial, 80 patients were randomized to receive oral synbiotic capsule (containing fructooligosaccharide and seven bacterial strains; Lactobacillus (L) casei, L. rhamnosus, Streptococcus thermophilus, Bifidobacterium breve, L. acidophilus, Bifidobacterium longum, L. bulgaricus, each one 109 colony-forming units) or placebo for two months. Inflammatory markers (Interleukin-6 [IL-6], C-reactive protein [CRP], erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]) and white blood cell (WBC) count were evaluated at two timepoints (baseline, two months later). The measured variables were adjusted for confounders and analyzed by SPSS v21.0.
Findings
All 80 enrolled patients completed the study. The study adherence was good (approximately 70%). The mean changes for IL-6 were not significant (Δ = −0.6 ± 10.4 pg/mL vs Δ = +11.2 ± 50.3 pg/mL, p > 0.05). There were no significant improvements for CRP, ESR and WBC.
Originality/value
Administration of synbiotics for two months did not improve inflammatory markers in COVID-19 patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.