Background: Laparoscopic colon surgery has been currently accepted as an alternative to open surgery for colon cancer. the laparoscopic approach, also, has been shown to offer clear evidence of benefit when compared to open surgery.Methods: From July 2013 to July 2016, patients admitted via the outpatient clinics of Menofia University Hospital for elective right hemicolectomy of proved malignancy of the cecum, ascending colon, and hepatic flexure of colon were evaluated for eligibility in this study.Results: The study consisted of 22 patients; of them 13 were males (59.1%) and 9 were females (40.9%) patients, with a mean age of 43±9 years (range 25-70 years). mean operative time was 125±14 minutes (range 100-145 minutes). only four (4) intramuscular opioid injections were given as post-operative analgesia. clear fluids were started 48 hours after surgery and soft diet allowed after 72 hours. the mean length of hospital stay was 5.7 days. Only one male patient was converted to conventional surgery due to advanced tumor. two patients developed surgical site infection in the post-operative period that was mild and managed conservatively. there were no cases with intestinal leakage and mortality rate in 30 days postoperative follow up was zero.Conclusions: Laparoscopic assisted right hemicolectomy is safe and feasible technique with a good learning curve
Background: The surgical intervention for acute appendicitis presenting with appendicular mass is not well established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefits of early laparoscopy and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in the treatment of appendicular mass.Methods: During a 1-year period, 48 patients underwent LA for suspected appendicitis (n = 39), generalized peritonitis (n = 1), and an appendicular mass (n = 8).Results: All appendectomies were attempted and done laparoscopically except in one case (appendicular abscess), converted to an open approach. None of appendicular mass patients developed complications. There were no deaths. There was no significant difference between appendicular mass forming patients and non-mass-forming patients who underwent LA for an early appendicular mass as regard to the operative time (median [interquartile range]: 50 [36–60] vs 45 [25–50] min, p = 0.085) and postoperative hospital stay (median [interquartile range]: 2 [1–2] vs [1–2] days, p = 0.1). Conclusions: Early LA for appendicular mass patients is feasible, safe, and avoids misdiagnoses and the need for hospital readmission.
Background: Laparoscopic colectomy is safe and effective, and in some cases, superior to open surgery, for a range of benign illnesses. The short-term advantages include less gastrointestinal discomfort, decreased wound infection and surgical morbidity, quicker bowel function restoration, and a shorter duration of hospital stay.Aim of the work & Methodology: evaluate our practice in laparoscopic colectomy by studied 20 patients with benign colorectal disorders admitted to our university hospital between Dec. 2015 and Dec. 2020. Inclusion criteria: 1. Age ranging from 15 to 70 years. 2. Patients with benign colorectal diseases, e.g., diverticular diseases, inflammatory bowel diseases, colonic polyps, rectal prolapse, etc. Exclusion criteria; malignant colorectal tumors and relative contraindication for laparoscopy. We were using classical laparoscopic techniques. Patients were discharged from the hospital when they could tolerate a regular diet. They were followed up at least six months, starting on the 30th postoperative day on a regular visit every two weeks—the data recorded including the intraoperative events and the difficulties and postoperative follow-up.Results: Technical difficulties are more remarkable for benign conditions than for cancer, especially for patients with inflammatory bowels, such as diverticular disease or inflammatory bowel disease, which frequently involve adjacent structures, peri-colic fibrosis, and lost planes. Surgeons should choose their patients before beginning laparoscopic colorectal surgeries.Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgery provides numerous advantages over open surgery, including minor discomfort, a shorter hospital stay, reduced morbidity, and a faster postoperative recovery. Our study cannot be utilized in a comparison study since it only evaluates our practice, and the findings may not be generalizable.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.