evere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused the global COVID-19 pandemic infecting more than 111 million people and causing 2.4 million deaths. Clinical disease in humans ranges from asymptomatic infection to pneumonia, severe respiratory compromise, multi-organ failure and systemic inflammatory syndromes. The rapid expansion and prolonged nature of the COVID-19 pandemic and its accompanying morbidity, mortality and destabilizing socioeconomic effects have made the development of SARS-CoV-2 therapeutics and vaccines an urgent global health priority 1. Indeed, the emergency use authorization and rapid deployment of antibody-based countermeasures, including mAbs, immune plasma therapy and messenger RNA, and inactivated and viral-vectored vaccines has provided hope for curtailing disease and ending the pandemic. The spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virion binds the cell-surface receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) to promote entry into human cells 2. Because the spike protein is critical for viral entry, it has been targeted for vaccine development and therapeutic antibody interventions. SARS-CoV-2 S proteins are cleaved to yield S1 and S2 fragments. The S1 protein includes the N-terminal (NTD) and receptor-binding (RBD) domains, whereas the S2 protein promotes membrane fusion. The RBD is recognized by many potently neutralizing monoclonal antibodies 3-7 , protein-based inhibitors 8 and serum antibodies 9. The current suite of antibody therapeutics and vaccines was designed with a spike protein based on strains circulating during the early phases of the pandemic in 2020. More recently, variants with enhanced transmissibility have emerged in the United Kingdom (B.1.1.7), South Africa (B.1.351), Brazil (B.1.1.248) and elsewhere with multiple substitutions in the spike protein, including in the NTD and the receptor-binding motif (RBM) of the RBD. Preliminary studies with pseudoviruses suggest that neutralization by some antibodies and immune sera may be diminished against variants expressing mutations in the spike gene 10-13. Given these

This is a PDF file of a peer-reviewed paper that has been accepted for publication. Although unedited, the content has been subjected to preliminary formatting. Nature is providing this early version of the typeset paper as a service to our authors and readers. The text and figures will undergo copyediting and a proof review before the paper is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Evidence suggests that immunogenicity to mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in immunosuppressed patients may be reduced. This study assessed the response to 2 doses of mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine among 133 participants with underlying chronic inflammatory disease, many of whom were receiving glucocorticoids, B-cell depletion therapy, or other immunosuppressant therapy.

In this study we profiled vaccine-induced polyclonal antibodies as well as plasmablast derived mAbs from individuals who received SARS-CoV-2 spike mRNA vaccine. Polyclonal antibody responses in vaccinees were robust and comparable to or exceeded those seen after natural infection. However, the ratio of binding to neutralizing antibodies after vaccination was greater than that after natural infection and, at the monoclonal level, we found that the majority of vaccine-induced antibodies did not have neutralizing activity. We also found a co-dominance of mAbs targeting the NTD and RBD of SARS-CoV-2 spike and an original antigenic-sin like backboost to seasonal human coronaviruses OC43 and HKU1. Neutralizing activity of NTD mAbs but not RBD mAbs against a clinical viral isolate carrying E484K as well as extensive changes in the NTD was abolished, suggesting that a proportion of vaccine induced RBD binding antibodies may provide substantial protection against viral variants carrying single E484K RBD mutations.

Germinal centres (GC) are lymphoid structures where B cells acquire affinity-enhancing somatic hypermutations (SHM), with surviving clones differentiating into memory B cells (MBCs) and long-lived bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs) [1][2][3][4][5] . SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination induces a persistent GC response that lasts for at least six months in humans [6][7][8] . The fate of responding GC B cells as well as the functional consequences of such persistence have not been elucidated. We detected SARS-CoV-2 spike (S)-specific MBCs in 42 individuals who had received two doses of BNT162b2, a SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine six months earlier. S-specific IgG-secreting BMPCs were detected in 9 out of 11 participants. Using a combined approach of sequencing the B cell receptors of responding blood plasmablasts and MBCs, lymph node GC and plasma cells and BMPCs from eight individuals and expression of the corresponding monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), we tracked the evolution of 1540 S-specific B cell clones. We show that early blood S-specific plasmablasts -on averageexhibited the lowest SHM frequencies. In comparison, SHM frequencies of S-specific GC B cells increased by 3.5-fold within six months after vaccination. S-specific MBCs and BMPCs accumulated high levels of SHM, which corresponded with enhanced anti-S antibody avidity in blood and affinity as well as neutralization capacity of BMPC-derived mAbs. This study documents how the striking persistence of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination-induced GC reaction in humans culminates in affinity-matured long-term antibody responses that potently neutralize the virus. B cell response to mRNA vaccinationWe have previously shown that vaccination of humans with The Pfizer-BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine, BNT162b2 induces a robust but transient circulating plasmablast (PB) response and a persistent germinal centre (GC) reaction in the draining lymph nodes 6 . Whether these persistent GC responses lead to the generation of affinity-matured memory B cells (MBCs) and long-lived bone marrow-resident plasma cells (BMPCs) remains unclear. To address this question, we analyzed long-term B cell responses in the participants enrolled in our previously described observational study of 43 healthy participants (13 with a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection) who received two doses of BNT162b2 (Extended Data Tables 1) 6,7 . Long-term blood samples (n=42) and fine needle aspirates (FNAs) of the draining axillary lymph nodes (n=15) were collected 29 weeks post-vaccination (Fig. 1a). Bone marrow aspirates were collected 29 (n=11) and 40 weeks (n=2) post-vaccination, with the latter time point used only for B cell receptor (BCR) repertoire profiling (Fig. 1a). None of the participants who contributed FNA or bone marrow specimens had SARS-CoV-2 infection history. GC B cells were detected in FNAs from all 15 participants (Fig. 1b, c, left panels, Extended Data Fig. 1a, Extended Data Table 2). All 14 participants with FNAs collected prior to week 29 generated S-binding GC B cell responses of varying magnitudes (Fig 1b, c, r...

Background: Individuals with Chronic Inflammatory Diseases (CID) are frequently treated with immunosuppressive medications that can increase their risk of severe COVID-19. While novel mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccination platforms provide robust protection in immunocompetent individuals, the immunogenicity in CID patients on immunosuppression is not well established. Therefore, determining the potency of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in the setting of immunosuppression is essential to risk-stratify CID patients with impaired protection and provide clinical guidance regarding medication management. Methods: We conducted a prospective assessment of mRNA-based vaccine immunogenicity in 133 adults with CIDs and 53 immunocompetent controls. Blood from participants over 18 years of age was collected before initial immunization and 1-2 weeks after the second immunization. Serum anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) IgG+ binding, neutralizing antibody titers, and circulating S-specific plasmablasts were quantified to assess the magnitude and quality of the humoral response following vaccination. Results: Compared to immunocompetent controls, a three-fold reduction in anti-S IgG titers (P=0.009) and SARS-CoV-2 neutralization (p<0.0001) were observed in CID patients. B cell depletion and glucocorticoids exerted the strongest effect with a 36- and 10-fold reduction in humoral responses, respectively (p<0.0001). Janus kinase inhibitors and antimetabolites, including methotrexate, also blunted antibody titers in multivariate regression analysis (P<0.0001, P=0.0023, respectively). Other targeted therapies, such as TNF inhibitors, IL-12/23 inhibitors, and integrin inhibitors, had only modest impacts on antibody formation and neutralization. Conclusions: CID patients treated with immunosuppressive therapies exhibit impaired SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-induced immunity, with glucocorticoids and B cell depletion therapy more severely impeding optimal responses.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused the global COVID-19 pandemic infecting more than 106 million people and causing 2.3 million deaths. The rapid deployment of antibody-based countermeasures has provided hope for curtailing disease and ending the pandemic1. However, the emergence of rapidly-spreading SARS-CoV-2 variants in the United Kingdom (B.1.1.7), South Africa (B.1.351), and elsewhere with mutations in the spike protein has raised concern for escape from neutralizing antibody responses and loss of vaccine efficacy based on preliminary data with pseudoviruses2-4. Here, using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), animal immune sera, human convalescent sera, and human sera from recipients of the Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) mRNA vaccine, we report the impact on antibody neutralization of a panel of authentic SARS-CoV-2 variants including a B.1.1.7 isolate, a chimeric Washington strain with a South African spike gene (Wash SA-B.1.351), and isogenic recombinant variants with designed mutations or deletions at positions 69-70, 417, 484, 501, and/or 614 of the spike protein. Several highly neutralizing mAbs engaging the receptor binding domain (RBD) or N-terminal domain (NTD) lost inhibitory activity against Wash SA-B.1.351 or recombinant variants with an E484K spike mutation. Most convalescent sera and virtually all mRNA vaccine-induced immune sera tested showed markedly diminished neutralizing activity against the Wash SA-B.1.351 strain or recombinant viruses containing mutations at position 484 and 501. We also noted that cell line selection used for growth of virus stocks or neutralization assays can impact the potency of antibodies against different SARS-CoV-2 variants, which has implications for assay standardization and congruence of results across laboratories. As several antibodies binding specific regions of the RBD and NTD show loss-of-neutralization potency in vitro against emerging variants, updated mAb cocktails, targeting of highly conserved regions, enhancement of mAb potency, or adjustments to the spike sequences of vaccines may be needed to prevent loss of protection in vivo.

In this study we profiled vaccine-induced polyclonal antibodies as well as plasmablast derived mAbs from subjects who received SARS-CoV-2 spike mRNA vaccine. Polyclonal antibody responses in vaccinees were robust and comparable to or exceeded those seen after natural infection. However, that the ratio of binding to neutralizing antibodies after vaccination was greater than that after natural infection and, at the monoclonal level, we found that the majority of vaccine-induced antibodies did not have neutralizing activity. We also found a co-dominance of mAbs targeting the NTD and RBD of SARS-CoV-2 spike and an original antigenic-sin like backboost to seasonal human coronaviruses OC43 and HKU1 spike proteins. Neutralizing activity of NTD mAbs but not RBD mAbs against a clinical viral isolate carrying E484K as well as extensive changes in the NTD was abolished, suggesting that a proportion of vaccine induced RBD binding antibodies may provide substantial protection against viral variants carrying E484K.