Background: Post-surgical rehabilitation of Colle’s fracture requires manual and exercise therapy to restore normal hand function. Aim: To compare the effectiveness of Maitland mobilization and Mulligan’s mobilization with movement on hand function and pain after Colle’s fracture. Study Design: Non randomized clinical study. Methodology: Study was conducted after ethical approval, at physiotherapy department Mayo hospital Lahore in 2019-20. Sample of 60 patients estimated by epitool, was divided into three equal groups (A, B & C). Subjects were screened on the basis of predefined eligibility criteria. All three groups received the respective therapy along with baseline treatment on alternate days for 4 weeks. Pre and post treatment and follow up assessments included VAS, patient rated wrist evaluation questionnaire and wrist ranges of motion with goniometer. Results: Mean age of participants was 45.38±6.58 years. No significant measures were found in any of the outcome measure between Maitland and Mulligan mobilization (p<0.05). Statistically significant improvement was found in all groups. Conclusion: We concluded that that the Mulligan mobilization with movement was effective to reduce pain and improve hand function in management after Colle’s fracture. Keywords: Colle’s Fracture, Post Fracture Stiffness, Radius Fracture, Mobilization and Mulligan’s Mobilization
The aim of this research is to find out the effects of muscle energy technique with and without functional task training on pain and disability in sacroiliac joint dysfunction.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.