Background: Antibiotics are among the most frequently prescribed drugs worldwide. The overuse and/ or misuse of antibiotics can result in significant consequences as antimicrobial resistance, therapeutic failures, drug toxicities and drug interactions. Since antibiotics are medications that mainly prescribed by physicians, any action aimed at improving use of antimicrobials must necessarily target physicians. Objectives: To assess knowledge, perception and practice of the resident doctors about antibiotic resistance and antibiotic prescription at Zagazig University Hospital and to identify factors affecting them. Methodology: A cross-sectional survey was done at Zagazig University teaching hospital between July and September 2013. Self-administrated questionnaire were used to assess resident doctors' knowledge, perception and practice about antibiotics. Results: From 195 target physicians, 175 agreed to participate. The mean score of knowledge about quiz answer, perception about resistance and perception about prescription were (3.6, 3.8, and 3.2 respectively). The age of the resident doctors was statistically significant affecting answering of the eight quizzes and in the perception about antibiotics resistance (P=0.00) The answering of the eight quizzes, perception about antibiotics resistance and perception about antimicrobial prescription were significantly higher among male doctors than female doctors (P=0.000). There was also significant association between experience (> 2years) and the answering of the eight quizzes, perception about antibiotics resistance (P=0.000). Age groups, answering of the eight quizzes, the perception about antibiotics resistance and perception about antimicrobial prescription were statistically significantly affecting practice of resident doctors about antibiotic prescription ( P<0.05). Conclusion: This study concluded that knowledge of resident doctors and perception about antibiotic prescription was suboptimal. The perception about antibiotic resistance was very high, while doctors' practice in prescribing antibiotic was satisfactory.
Background: Pharyngitis is one of the most frequently faced pediatric problems with serious complications in primary care. Objective(s): To compare between Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) guidelines and traditional management concerning diagnosis and antibiotic prescription for acute pharyngitis in children less than 5 years, as well as to determine validity of IMCI guidelines in diagnosis of acute pharyngitis by comparing their results to throat culture as a golden standard. Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted in one primary health care center and one unit where IMCI guidelines were implemented; as well as one center and one unit where traditional management of acute pharyngitis was implemented in Zagazig district, on 343 children under five years complaining of sore throat or difficult feeding. About 86 children were randomly selected from each health facility during the period of first of January until end of June 2017. Doctor's clinical diagnosis and antibiotic prescription were reported for all children, while throat swabs were taken from children managed according to IMCI guidelines for bacterial culture. Results: According to IMCI, only 11 % of children were diagnosed as bacterial pharyngitis, antibiotic prescription was significantly lower among those managed according to IMCI compared to traditional methods (11% & 96.5% respectively, P<0.001). However, throat culture revealed that 28.5% of children managed according to IMCI guidelines had positive bacterial growth. Sensitivity of IMCI guidelines to detect bacterial cases of pharyngitis was only 36.7 % and Positive Predictive Value (PPV) was 94.7%, while their specificity to exclude bacterial and detect viral infection was about 99.2% and the Negative Predictive Value (NPV) was 79.7%. Conclusion: Application of IMCI guidelines is considered valuable in prevention of antibiotic abuse. However, the sensitivity of IMCI guidelines to detect bacterial pharyngitis was 36.7%.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.