No abstract

Introduction:There has been a progressive decline in students’ interest to consider cardiothoracic surgery as future career in the distant regions in the world. There are many factors could explain declining interest in cardiothoracic surgery including diminished caseloads due to the expansive growth of interventional cardiology; length of training programs that influences medical student’s perception. King Abdulaziz University student’s interest to join the speciality explored in our study. We determined some factors that influence their decision making toward their cardiothoracic career.Aim:We aimed to estimate the current interests of medical students at King Abdulaziz University to pursue a career in Cardiothoracic surgery and to determine the factors that positively or negatively affect their decision.Material and Methods:A self-administered online survey designed on Google form was distributed through email to fourth, fifth, and sixth-year medical students. Five domains; demographics, current career intentions, previous exposure to surgery, experiences and perceptions of cardiothoracic surgery were covered in the questionnaire to identify factors affecting student decision to choose cardiothoracic surgery as a future career.Results:Among 486 students at our institution, 179 (36, 83%) medical students completed the questionnaire more than half of them 91 (50.8%) were males. The percentage of students who considered cardiothoracic surgery as a future career was (4.5%); when asked if they were serious in pursuing a career in cardiothoracic surgery, (14.5%) of the student were affirmative. Of those participated in the survey, Twenty-four students believed they had adequate introduction to the cardiothoracic surgery during their undergraduate program.Conclusion:cardiothoracic surgery is falling away behind other specialties as career of choice for many future physicians. It is believed mainly related to inadequate introduction to the field. Increasing exposure and close mentorship is needed to attract more students to pursue a career in cardiothoracic surgery.

Purpose Research methodology is an essential part of evidence-based medicine. Many educational programs include clinical research methodology within their curriculum. Moreover, students’ preferences for learning methods are different than before, as they now prefer alternative methods, such as peer teaching. Peer-assisted learning enhances students’ tutoring skills. Thus, the current study aimed to evaluate the effect of peer teaching on enhancing clinical research skills. Participants and Methods Peer-assisted learning was evaluated during a four-week online research methodology course designed for medical students at King Abdulaziz University. A total of 121 students’ and 38 tutors’ attitudes and perceptions of peer teaching were evaluated using a self-administered questionnaire. The effectiveness of peer teaching was assessed using pre- and post-course knowledge tests. Chi-square was used to assess the association of qualitative data, and Mann–Whitney U -test and Wilcoxon rank test were used as nonparametric tests for the variables that were not normally distributed. Results The post-course knowledge score was significantly higher than the pre-test score. Students had a positive perception of peer-assisted learning. Over 90% of the students preferred peer-assisted learning to traditional teaching. Similarly, the tutors had significantly positive perceptions of peer-assisted teaching. Younger students who had higher post-test mean knowledge scores had a good perception of peer teaching. Conclusion The current study demonstrates students’ and tutors’ positive perceptions of peer-assisted learning as well as the effectiveness of peer learning. Medical schools should pay more attention to students and prepare them for peer-teacher roles.

BackgroundObesity is a well-known risk factor for developing severe coronavirus disease 2019 . In this study, we sought to determine the relationship between obesity and poor outcomes in patients with COVID-19 patients at King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. MethodsWe conducted a single-centered descriptive study of adult COVID-19 patients hospitalized between March 1 and December 31, 2020, at KAUH. Patients were classified according to body mass index (BMI) as overweight (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m 2 ) or obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m 2 ). The main outcomes were admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), intubation, and death. ResultsData were analyzed from 300 COVID-19 patients. Most study participants were overweight (61.8%), and 38.2% were obese. The most significant comorbidities were diabetes (46.8%) and hypertension (41.9%). Both hospital mortality (10.4% for obese; 3.8% for overweight, p = 0.021) and intubation rates (34.6% for obese; 22.7% for overweight, p = 0.004) were significantly higher among obese patients than overweight patients. There was no significant difference in terms of ICU admission rate between both groups. However, intubation rates (34.6% for obese; 22.7% for overweight, p = 0.004) and hospital mortality (10.4% for obese; 3.8% for overweight, p = 0.021) were significantly higher among obese patients than overweight patients. ConclusionsThis study aimed to describe the effect of high BMI on the clinical outcome of COVID-19 patients in Saudi Arabia. Obesity is significantly correlated with poor clinical outcomes in COVID-19. It is also associated with higher mortality and the need for mechanical ventilation necessitating intensive care unit admission. Patients with higher BMI should be prioritized in the hospital setting, as they have a higher potential of developing severe COVID-19 complications and sequelae.

Background Intravenous epinephrine has been a key treatment in cardiopulmonary arrest since the early 1960s. The ideal timing for the first dose of epinephrinee is uncertain. We aimed to investigate the association of immediate epinephrine administration (within 1-min of recognition of cardiac arrest) with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) up to 24-h. Methods This was a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We included the following patients: 1) ≥18 years-old, 2) non-shockable rhythms, 3) received intravenous epinephrine during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 4) witnessed in-hospital arrest and 5) first resuscitation attempt (for patients requiring more than one resuscitation attempt). We excluded patients who suffered from traumatic arrest, were pregnant, had shockable rhythms, arrested in the operating room, with Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) order, and patient aged 17 years-old or less. Results A total of 360 patients were included in the analysis. Median age was 62 years old and median epinephrine administration time was two minutes. We found that immediate epinephrine administration (within 1-min) is associated with higher rates of ROSC up to 24-h (OR = 1.25, 95% CI; [1.01–1.56]), compared with early epinephrine (≥2-min) administration. After adjusting for confounding covariates, earlier administration of epinephrine predicted higher rates of ROSC sustained for up to 24-h (OR 1.33 95%CI [1.13–1.55]). Conclusions Immediate administration of epinephrine in conjunction with high-quality CPR is associated with higher rates of ROSC.