Kristjansson, M.: Deci and Ryan's cognitive evaluation theory of intrinsic motivation: A set of common sense theorems. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 34, 338-352.Cognitive evaluation theory as put forward by Deci and Ryan (1985) is examined. The theory, which deals with intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, has inspired considerable amount of empirical research in the last two decades. However, contrary to the mainstream view and that of its authors, it is argued here that the theory consists of necessary truths of common sense (folk) psychology, rather than contingent and empirically testable hypotheses. As such the theory spells out what must necessarily be the case in human motivation and the empirical evidence amassed to test its validity is irrelevant. Such testing should be abandoned if its purpose is to appraise the truth value of the theory's propositions. To empirically test necessary true propositions is not only redundant in such cases, but also a waste of time and resources.
The relation between extraversion (EPI) and length of aftereffect was investigated when spiral aftereffect was measured on the same Ss under three instructions: (a) normal— S is told to report “When the aftereffect appears to stop” and after Ss had been informed of two phases in the decay of the aftereffect and told to (b) report the end of the first, faster, phase of decay, or (c) report when “they were absolutely sure that the second phase of decay had ended.” Near zero correlations were obtained between E and SAE under conditions (a) and (c) but E and SAE were negatively and significantly correlated under condition (b). It is suggested that failure to differentiate these instruction conditions could account for many of the previous contradictory findings on the relation between E and SAE duration.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.