BackgroundHerein we present our experience with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in managing common bile duct stones.MethodsData of 129 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and LCBDE done at our institutes from April 2011 through June 2016 were prospectively recorded and retrospectively reviewed.ResultsSince 2011, 3012 laparoscopic cholecystectomy were performed at our institutes, intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC) was done in 295 (9.8%) patients which detected choledocholithiasis in 129 (4.3%) of them. LCBDE was successful to clear the common bile duct (CBD) in 123/129 (95.4%). Six patients underwent postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) because of incomplete CBD clearance (4 cases), symptomatic stenosed papilla (2 cases). LCBDE was performed in 103 patients via trans-cystic approach and choledochotomy one in 26 patients. In the choledochotomy group, seven patients had primary closure of the CBD, CBD was closed over T-tube in nine patients whereas the remaining 10 patients the CBD was closed over antegrade inserted stent. The median time of hospital stay was 4 (range; 1–15) days. No patients showed retained CBD stones with mean follow up was 9 ± 3.4 months.ConclusionLCBDE is a safe and cost effective option for CBD stones in short-term outcome and can be performed provided proper laparoscopic expertise and facilities are available.
Diabetic foot ulcer syndrome is a common complication of diabetes mellitus. Three main factors contribute to it: neuropathy, vasculopathy, and infection. This study was conducted to evaluate the prevalence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in diabetic foot ulcer patients and its impact on limb salvage as an outcome. This prospective cross-sectional study included 392 cases, who were divided according to the presence of PAD into 2 groups; patients with PAD were labeled as PAD +ve (172 cases) and those without PAD were labeled as PAD −ve (22 cases). All cases were clinically assessed, and routine laboratory examinations were ordered. Moreover, duplex ultrasound was done for suspected cases of having PAD by examination. Computed tomography angiography was ordered for patients who are in need of a revascularization procedure. Cases were managed by debridement and/or revascularization. After that, these cases were assessed clinically and radiologically for vascularity and infection and the possibility for amputation was evaluated. Infection was classified using Wagner Classification System, and revascularization was decided according to the TASC II system. The incidence of PAD in cases with diabetic foot ulcer syndrome was 43.87%. No difference was detected between the 2 groups regarding age and gender ( P > .05). The prevalence of smoking, hemodialysis, ischemic heart disease (IHD), and hypertension was more significantly higher in cases with PAD ( P < .05). Revascularization procedures were only performed in cases that had documented severe PAD or chronic limb-threatening ischemia in addition to foot ulcer and/or infection. With regard to limb salvage, it was more significantly performed in cases without PAD (82.3% vs 48.3% in PAD cases; P < .001). Male gender, smoking, ankle-brachial pressure index, hemodialysis, IHD, neuropathy, HbA1C, PAD, and high Wagner classification were predictors of limb amputation ( P < .05). PAD is associated with worse outcomes in diabetic foot ulcer patients. Not only does it constitute a great number among diabetic foot ulcer patients, but it also has a negative impact on limb salvage.
This new access point may represent a safe, fast, and easy way to create pneumoperitoneum, as well as a promising alternative to Palmer's point in patients who are not candidates for classic midline entry.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.