Breast conserving treatment (BCT) is a safe standard therapeutic method in patients with early invasive breast cancer. However, it is associated with an increased risk of residual neoplastic tissues in surgical margins. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of the use of the intraoperative pathologic analysis by the frozen section (FS) method for evaluation of the extent of the primary lumpectomy. The study concerns a retrospective analysis of a group of 1102 patients who underwent BCT between Jan 2015 and Dec 2016. The assessment focused on the frequency of the intraoperative pathologic analysis of the primary lumpectomy extent (fresh frozen section method). The influence of the BCT specimen analysis method on the free margins width, as well as the rate and the cause of reoperation were evaluated. The intraoperative lumpectomy evaluation was performed in 45.8% (505/1102) of patients (Group I), while in the remaining 54.2% of the cases it was decided to abandon this procedure (Group II). Although in 72 (14.3%) patients the intraoperative analysis gave negative results, the margins contained residual tumor tissue (vs. 16.9% in Group II). In Group I, conversion from the previously planned BCT to mastectomy was necessary in 5.9% (30/505) patients (vs. 9.7% in Group II). The duration of surgery was 48.9 ± 17.3 minutes (Group I) and 42.9 ± 13.6 minutes (Group II). In patients undergoing BCT, the use of the intraoperative pathologic analysis by the FS method resulted in a reduction of the total number of reoperations performed due to residual tumor found in the margins following the primary lumpectomy. However, it statistically significantly extended the duration of the surgery.

Background and objectives: Surgery is the primary and most effective treatment of breast cancer. Unilateral mastectomy disrupts the distribution of muscle tension between the right and the left sides of the body. The aim of the study was to evaluate postural balance in patients treated for breast cancer by mastectomy. Materials and methods: A controlled clinical study was conducted on 90 patients who have undergone surgical treatment for breast cancer (mastectomy) 5–6 years prior (Breast Group—BG). The control group (CG) consisted of 74 healthy female volunteers. Analysis of balance was performed using the Alfa stabilography platform. A static test (Romberg’s test) with open and closed eyes was used to assess balance. The following balance parameters were analyzed: path length, statokinesigram area, parameters of deflection and velocity of the foot pressure center. Results: The study demonstrated that patients from BG (5–6 years after surgery) obtained worse results in both tests with open (maximum back deviation, maximum forward deviation, average Y deviation, average Y velocity, path length and path surface area) (p < 0.05) as well as with closed eyes (maximum backward deviation, maximum forward deviation, mean Y deviation and path length) (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that women 5–6 years after surgery for breast cancer have impaired balance compared to healthy women, despite physiotherapy.

Purpose Monitoring of the quality of life of patients in addition to satisfactory survival indexes in order to choose an optimal treatment method is a trend in contemporary oncological surgery. The goal of the study was to prospectively evaluate the quality of life of patients treated for colorectal cancer depending on the type of surgical technique (open surgery (OS) vs. laparoscopic surgery (LS)). Methods The quality of life was evaluated thrice in the study groups (on the day of admission to the ward (I), 6 months (II), and 18 months after the procedure (III)). The following questionnaires were used in this evaluation: QLQ-C30 European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, QLQ-CR29 Quality of Life Questionnaire (module-colorectal cancer), and Acceptance of Illness Scale (AIS).Results Sixty-seven patients completed this prospective clinical cohort study (LS-32; OS-35). The QLQ-C30 questionnaire demonstrated improvement in functional scales among patients treated with LS technique (p < 0.05) as well as with regard to overall quality of life 6 months after surgery (p < 0,001), while at 18 months postsurgery, statistically significant differences were noted for physical function (p = 0.001) and overall quality of life (p < 0.0001). AIS scale analysis demonstrated that patients treated with laparoscopy were characterized by better acceptance of illness (p < 0.05). Statistically significant differences between OS and LS groups were noted based on the QLQ-CR29 questionnaire with regard to the following scales: body image (p = 0.041) and body mass problem (p = 0.024)-patients treated with LS technique had better scores. Conclusions Laparoscopic surgery gives patients a chance for better quality of life.

Aim of the study The goal of our study was to assess the sexual functioning of patients undergoing mastectomy, five years after surgery, compared to a control group. Material and methods A cross-sectional study included 170 patients five years post mastectomy (group A1) and 149 healthy women (group A2) who had never been diagnosed with breast cancer. The study was conducted at the Oncology Centre in Bydgoszcz, at the Amazon Clubs, and at the University of the Third Age by the University of Economy in Bydgoszcz. Standardised questionnaires: the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and Rosenberg’s SES (self-esteem scale) were used. Results Our study results show significantly worse sexual functioning in the domains pertaining to desire ( p = 0.0015), arousal ( p = 0.0052), lubrication ( p = 0.0026), ability to reach orgasm ( p = 0.0417), sexual satisfaction ( p = 0.0142), and the presence of clinically significant sexual dysfunction ( p = 0.0028) among patients after amputation of the mammary gland. On the scale of pain relating to sexuality, there were no significant differences between the two groups ( p > 0.05). The overall score in the FSFI questionnaire was also lower ( p = 0.0066) among women after mastectomy. Highly statistically significant ( p < 0.0001) differences in self-esteem were also noted between the two groups, with worse results observed in patients after mastectomy. Conclusions Diagnosis of sexual dysfunction in patients treated for breast cancer allows timely implementation of counselling and interventional therapy depending on the causal factors and individual preferences of patients.

Aim of the studyThe goal of this work was to assess upper-limb sequelae among patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy (BCT) for breast cancer 5–6 years after the surgical procedure.Material and methodsA controlled clinical study was conducted on 128 patients who had undergone surgery 5–6 years prior. BCT + ALND (axillary lymph node dissection) was performed in 58 patients and 69 underwent BCT + SLND (sentinel lymph node dissection). Patients declared active participation in physiotherapy. The following parameters were assessed in studied subjects: range of motion in the shoulder joint, superficial sensation, upper limb circumference, skin sensation, and presence of winged scapula sign.ResultsFive to six years after BCT, patients who had undergone BCT + ALND presented with significantly poorer outcomes concerning upper limb range of motion on the operated side compared to the BCT + SLND group with regard to the following features: flexion (p = 0.00004), external rotation (p = 0.0292), and internal rotation (p = 0.0448). However, no statistically significant differences were noted between compared groups with regard to upper limb circumference and sensation disturbances. Statistically significant differences between limb on the operated side (operated limb – OL) vs. contralateral limb (healthy limb – HL) were noted in the BCT + SLND group with regard to the range of motion in extension (p = 0.0004), external rotation (p = 0.0055), and internal rotation (p < 0.0001), as well as the occurrence of winged scapula sign (p < 0.0001) and sensation disturbances (p < 0.0001).ConclusionsOur study demonstrated that both procedures are not free of distant sequelae, although the BCT + ALND group is more frequently affected.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of life of patients undergoing surgical treatment of breast cancer depending on the type of procedure involving the breast (mastectomy vs. breast conserving treatment) and axillary fossa (sentinel lymph node biopsy vs. axillary lymph node dissection). The prospective study was carried out in a group of 338 females undergoing breast cancer treatment. Study variables were assessed by means of a diagnostic survey using standardized QLQ C30 and BR23 questionnaires as well as the Acceptance of Illness Scale and Mini-MAC scales. The quality of life was assessed at threetime points: on the day before the surgical procedure (I assessment) as well as three and 12 months after surgery (II and III assessment). Statistically significant differences between study groups were observed in the overall quality of life subscale (I, II, III—p < 0.0001), physical functioning (I—p < 0.0001; II—p = 0.0413; III—p < 0.0001), role functioning (I—p = 0.0002; III—p < 0.0001), emotional functioning (III—p = 0.0082), cognitive functioning (I—p = 0.0112; III—p < 0.0001), social functioning (III—p < 0.0001), body image (I, II, III—p < 0.0001), and sexual functioning (I—p = 0.0233; III—p = 0.0011). In most symptomatic scales, significant (p < 0.05) differences were also noted. Mastectomy and limfadenectomy patients were significantly (p < 0.0001) more prone to present with destructive coping strategies one year after surgery. Breast conserving therapy is associated with better quality of life outcomes as compared to mastectomy. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is associated with a lower intensity of adverse changes in multiple dimensions of patients’ functioning.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a standard in diagnostic and therapeutic management of patients with nonadvanced invasive breast cancer. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the clinical importance of the failure of sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification during SLNB performed to spare axillary lymph nodes. A total of 5396 patients with invasive breast cancer qualified for SLNB, treated in a period from Jan 2004 to June 2018. All cases of the failure of SLN identification and reasons underlying this situation were analyzed retrospectively. In 196 (3.6%) patients, SLN was not identified (group I), and this resulted in a simultaneous axillary lymph node dissection. 48.5% patients from this group were diagnosed with cancer metastases to lymph nodes (vs 23.6% patients with SLN removed-group II, P < .00001)-stage pN1 in 44.2% of the cases, stage pN2 in 22.1% of the cases, and pN3 in 33.7% (in group II-73.4%, 19.5% and 7.1%, respectively), with a presence of extracapsular infiltration in 68.4% patients (vs 41.7% in group II) and with a significantly higher percentage of micrometastatic nature in group II (17.0%, vs 3.2% in group I). The failure of intraoperative sentinel lymph node mapping indicates a significantly increased risk of breast cancer metastases to the axillary lymph system. At the same time, it can also indicate higher cancer stage and its increased aggressiveness. For this reason, in such situation performance of axillary lymph node dissection still appears to be the approach most advantageous for patients. K E Y W O R D Sbreast cancer, sentinel lymph node biopsy, sentinel lymph node identification, sentinel lymph node metastasis

Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate posture in patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy (BCT) in relation to the type of surgical intervention to the axilla. Methods: The study was conducted on patients who had undergone breast-conserving surgical treatment for breast cancer 5–6 years earlier. In 54 patients, BCT+ALND (axillary lymph node dissection) was performed, while 63 patients were subjected to BCT+SLND (sentinel lymph node dissection). The control group consisted of 54 females. The study was conducted using digital postural assessment. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed with respect to the parameters between the BCT+SLNB and BCT+ALND groups (p > 0.05). However, the differences were highly significant between the CG (control group) and the studied groups (BCT+ALND, BCT+SLNB) for the following parameters: BETA angle of thoracolumbar spine inclination (p = 0.002), GAMMA angle of thoracic spine inclination (p = 0.0044), TKA (thoracic kyphosis angle) (p < 0.0001) and shoulder level inclination (p = 0.0004). The BCT+ALND patients were characterized by higher dependency of raised shoulder (p = 0.0028) and inferior angle of the scapula (p = 0.00018) on the operated side compared to BCT+SLNB patients. Conclusions: Postural imbalance occurs independent of the type of axillary intervention. Disturbances within the upper torso (abnormal position of shoulders and inferior angles of scapulae) are more pronounced in patients after ALND.