Background:The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology represents a significant improvement in classification of urinary specimens. The system acknowledges the difficulty in cytologically diagnosing low-grade urothelial carcinomas and has developed categories to deal with this issue. The system uses six categories: unsatisfactory, negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (NHGUC), atypical urothelial cells, suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma, high-grade urothelial carcinoma, other malignancies and a seventh subcategory (low-grade urothelial neoplasm).Methods:Three hundred and fifty-seven urine specimens were independently reviewed by four cytopathologists unaware of the previous diagnoses. Each cytopathologist rendered a diagnosis according to the Paris System categories. Agreement was assessed using absolute agreement and weighted chance-corrected agreement (kappa). Disagreements were classified as low impact and high impact based on the potential impact of a misclassification on clinical management.Results:The average absolute agreement was 65% with an average expected agreement of 44%. The average chance-corrected agreement (kappa) was 0.32. Nine hundred and ninety-nine of 1902 comparisons between rater pairs were in agreement, but 12% of comparisons differed by two or more categories for the category NHGUC. Approximately 15% of the disagreements were classified as high clinical impact.Conclusions:Our findings indicated that the scheme recommended by the Paris System shows adequate precision for the category NHGUC, but the other categories demonstrated unacceptable interobserver variability. This low level of diagnostic precision may negatively impact the applicability of the Paris System for widespread clinical application.
Visual quantitation of N/C ratio showed only a fair correlation with actual N/C ratio with correlation decreasing with increasing N/C ratio. In the critical range, 0.5-0.7 N/C ratio both interobserver correlation and correlation with true N/C ratio may be insufficiently accurate for precise category assignment as used in the Paris System. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2017;45:107-112. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Objectives: The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) established diagnostic categories for cytologic specimens of the thyroid. Each category was associated with an estimated risk of malignancy. Recently, the non-invasive follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma has been reclassified as benign. This reclassification may alter the malignancy risk of TBSRTC diagnostic categories. Study Design: A literature search was made for all studies investigating the effect of reclassification of some non-invasive follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinomas as benign on the malignancy risk associated with TBSRTC categories. The authors calculated the malignancy risk for TBSRTC categories in a series of 315 thyroid aspirates when the non-invasive follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma was considered benign. A meta-analysis of malignancy risk data for the 3 published studies and the current study was performed. Results: The meta-analysis showed that the malignancy risk was reduced for all TBSRTC categories except the “non-diagnostic” category. The reduction in malignancy risk was greatest in the categories “suspicious for malignancy” and “atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance.” Conclusion: A meta-analysis of all pertinent studies demonstrated that re-categorization of the non-invasive follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma as benign reduces the malignancy risk in the majority of TBSRTC categories.
Two novel, bionanocomposite scaffolds were evaluated in a rodent model over the course of three months to determine whether these scaffolds possessed adequate biocompatibility characteristics to warrant further evaluation as possible tissue reconstruction scaffolds. These bionanocomposite scaffolds were comprised of amine-functionalized gold nanoparticles (AuNP) or silicon carbide nanowires (SiCNW) crosslinked to an acellular porcine diaphragm tendon. It was hypothesized that the addition of nanomaterials to the porcine tendon would also improve its biocompatibility by imparting a nanostructured surface. As early as seven days after implantation, both types of bionanocomposite scaffolds displayed evidence of granulation tissue and the beginning of scaffold remodeling with new collagen deposited by the host, and by ninety-seven days the bionanocomposite scaffolds were completely remodeled with no evidence of any adverse host tissue reaction or scar tissue formation. The AuNP bionanocomposite scaffolds exhibited accelerated scaffold remodeling compared to the SiCNW scaffolds.
Background: In 2018, the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology was published defining a diagnostic categorization scheme with known malignancy risks and clinical follow up recommendations. Inter-observer reproducibility of the categories was not defined.Methods: Salivary gland fine-needle aspirations (FNA) were reviewed over a 5 year period and classified by three independent observers. Inter-observer reproducibility was estimated using observed agreement and chance corrected agreement (Cohen's kappa).Results: Four hundred and eight cases were reviewed with chance corrected agreement of 0.42 for the original Milan System and 0.48 for a modified system using "similar follow up" categories. Categories 4A and 6B showed substantial agreement (kappa =0.71 and 0.72).Conclusion: The Milan System shows moderate over all agreement between observers. Strongest inter-observer agreement was seen for categories 4A and 6B. K E Y W O R D Scytopathology, inter-observer reproducibility, Milan system, salivary gland
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.