In the present study, radiation exposure for urologists was low, but so was knowledge of radiation safety and optimization practices. This absence of training for radiation safety and reduction, teamed with novel techniques involving long fluoroscopy-guided interventions, could result in unnecessarily high exposure for patients and OR personnel.
Introduction: Radiation exposure during urologic procedures is still of concern in the urologist’s community. It has been reported that percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in supine position will have less irradiation as the puncture is mostly done under ultrasound guidance. However, it can also be done under fluoroscopy guidance. Unfortunately, data on radiation exposure during PCNL is more lacking since they are often drawn form generalization and extrapolation, or not evaluating new procedures or different positions. The aim of our study was to compare the radiation dose depending on the position of the surgeon. Methods: A portable C-arm was used in standard mode (32 impulsions/second; 98kV, 3.8mA). Specific dosimeters were placed for lens, extremity and torso. Anthropomorphic models and hand phantom models were used to reproduce the position of surgeon and patient (with same bone density than human) during PCNL in prone and modified supine position. Fluoroscopy time (FT) was 6 minutes to obtain higher exploitable signal, and the results are given for a FT of 3 minutes (more realistic). Ten percent of the FT is done with an angulation of 15 degrees and the rest in anteroposterior position. Results: The equivalent doses (ED) are given in uSV (uncertainty k=2). During the modified supine position: neck, lens, right index finger, left thumb and index finger received ED of 99 (20%), 62 (18%), 437 (10%), 112 (12%), 204 (10%), respectively. In a prone position, the phantom received ED on the neck, lens, right thumb and index finger, left thumb and index finger of 85 (20%), 92 (12%), 401 (10%), 585 (10%), 295 (10%), 567 (10%), respectively. In both position, the right hand seems more exposed than the left hand. Conclusion: The effective dose is 1.5 and 1.3 fold higher for lens and extremities, respectively, in a prone position PCNL compared to a modified supine position. Both positioning are still well below the recommended limit for professional exposition.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.