No abstract

Endoscopic resection alone is adequate for the management of patients with SM-CRC and low risk features. However, in those patients with SM-CRC and high risk features, surgery should be considered in addition to endoscopic resection.

Background A preoperative histologic diagnosis of neoplasia is a requirement for endoscopic resection (ER). However, discrepancies may occur between histologic diagnoses based on biopsy specimens versus ER specimens. The aim of this study was to assess the rate of discrepancy between histologic diagnoses from biopsy specimens and ER specimens. Methods A total of 1705 gastric lesions, from 1419 patients with a biopsy diagnosis of neoplasia, were treated by ER from September 2002 to December 2008. We compared the histologic diagnosis from the biopsy sample and the final diagnosis from the ER specimen to assess the discrepancy rate. Clinicopathological characteristics of the lesions that were related to the histologic discrepancies were also studied. Results An ER diagnosis of gastric cancer was made in 49% (118/241) of lesions diagnosed as borderline lesions from biopsy specimens; this included adenomas and lesions difficult to diagnose as regenerative or neoplastic. The size, existence of a depressed area, and ulceration findings were significant factors observed in these lesions. An ER diagnosis of differentiated type cancer was obtained for 17% (12/63) of lesions diagnosed as undifferentiated type cancer from the biopsy specimens; for these lesions, the color and a mixed histology were significant factors related to the histologic discrepancies. Conclusion A biopsy diagnosis of borderline lesions or undifferentiated type cancer is more likely to disagree with the diagnosis from ER specimens. Endoscopic characteristics should be considered together with the biopsy diagnosis to determine the treatment strategy for these lesions.

No abstract

Shielding methods for post-endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) ulcers have delivery-related problems. We developed an enveloped device for this purpose and evaluated its usefulness. Polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheets were delivered to six 3.0-cm ulcers in two resected porcine stomachs and six 5.0-cm ulcers in another three stomachs. In the regular method group, small PGA sheets were delivered via forceps. In the novel method group, a large PGA sheet was delivered via the new device. The methods were compared in terms of time, and macroscopic and histological findings of the ulcer floor. The median time required to cover a 3.0-cm ulcer was 0.39 min/cm in the novel method group and 1.03 min/cm in the regular method group ( = 0.03), and to cover a 5.0-cm ulcer was 0.38 min/cm and 0.85 min/cm, respectively ( = 0.03). In the novel method group, the PGA sheets were in close contact, fully covering the ulcer floor. In the regular method group, the sheets were partly elevated from the ulcer floor. This novel technique seems promising in this preliminary study.