Hospital practitioners rely on care partners of older adults to provide complex care without identifying and addressing their needs. The Care Partner Hospital Assessment Tool (CHAT) was developed to identify the education skill training needs of care partners of hospitalized older adults. This two-phased mixed-method study evaluated the appropriateness and feasibility of the CHAT. The phase 1 quantitative survey with caregiving experts indicated 70–100% agreement for the length and helpfulness of the CHAT (n = 23). These results were supported by phase 2 qualitative interviews with hospital administrators and practitioners, which revealed the following themes: (1) intuitive and clear design worth sustaining and (2) concerns and proposed solutions for implementation. Findings suggest the CHAT is an appropriate and feasible tool for hospital practitioners to tailor their education and skills training to address care partners’ needs. Identifying care partners’ needs is an important step in ensuring they are prepared to complete their caregiving responsibilities.

Background/Objectives: When aging adults are hospitalized due to a major health event, they often turn to care partners (‘family members or friends’) for support. Assessment of care partners’ needs during hospital care may be important to inform and target information and skills training that will equip them to fulfill caregiving tasks for the aging adults. The objectives of this study were to develop and complete content validation of the Care Partner Hospital Assessment Tool (CHAT). Methods: Based on standard instrumentation methodology and an assessment framework recommended by the National Center on Caregiving at the Family Caregiving Alliance, three steps were followed to develop and validate CHAT: (1) generation of a 24-item tool grouped into three content domains (background, plans and preferences, skills and supports), and a survey by a multidisciplinary team, (2) administration of an online survey of care partners and experts, and (3) assessment of item and scale-content validity indices (I-CVI and S-CVI). Results: A total of four care partners that provide unpaid care to a family member or friend age 65 years or older with a chronic illness or disability either before or after a hospitalization, and 19 leading experts in gerontology, caregiving, and health services completed an online survey in English. Twenty-two items were accepted by having an I-CVI at or above the acceptable 78% cut point; the S-CVI for the tool was 85%. Most revisions to the tool were associated with modifying or clarifying language within each item. For example, participants shared the following open-ended suggestions for revising CHAT: (1) change the “do you prefer” sentence stem to “do you want” (n = 12), define “training” (n = 6), and (2) allow care partners to provide an unsure response (n = 5). Conclusion: CHAT may be a promising way to increase health care practitioner’s understanding of care partners’ backgrounds, preferences and plans, and potential information or training needs during a patient’s hospital stay. Initial evaluation of CHAT reveals strong conceptual development and content validity.

Background: The care partners of hospitalised older adults often feel dissatisfied with the education and skills training provided to them, resulting in unpreparedness and poor health outcomes. Objective: This review aimed to characterise and identify gaps in the education and skills training used with the care partners of older adults in the hospital. Methods: We conducted a scoping review on the education and skills training practices used with the care partners of hospitalised older adults in the USA via sources identified in the PubMed, PsychINFO and CINAHL databases. Results: Twelve studies were included in this review. Results illustrate that nurses utilise multiple modes of delivery and frequently provide education and skills training tailored to the needs of care partners at the latter end of hospital care. The provision of education and skills training varies greatly, however, including who provides education, in what way information is conveyed, and how care partner outcomes are measured. Conclusion: This is the first scoping review to describe and synthesise the education and skills training practices used with care partners of hospitalised older adults. Findings highlight the need for education and skills training to be interprofessional, tailored to individual care partners’ needs and begin at, or even before, the hospital admission of older adult patients.

Eating and mealtime challenges are common in autistic children, yet intervention access is limited. Telehealth may provide opportunities to address this gap and increase access for underserved families. This study examined the occupational therapy practitioner’s perceptions of transitioning from a caregiver-mediated, in-home eating, and mealtime intervention for autistic children to telehealth owing to COVID-19 while considering the impact on accessibility, challenges, and benefits. Family characteristics were compared between groups. Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews explored practitioners’ experiences of telehealth. Statistical findings and themes were directly compared and contrasted. The following three themes emerged: Intervention Adaptations, Challenges for Interventionists, and Benefits of Telehealth. The differences in the families’ geographic location were identified. Themes and family characteristic differences supported increased intervention accessibility for the telehealth group. This study provides preliminary evidence that telehealth can increase access to specialized services. There are benefits and challenges to implementing telehealth with families and autistic children.