Background The prevalence of diseases other than tuberculosis (TB) detected during chest X‐ray screening is poorly described in sub‐Saharan Africa. Computer‐assisted digital chest X‐ray technology is available for TB screening and has the potential to be a screening tool for non‐communicable diseases as well. Low‐ and middle‐income countries are in a transition period where the burden of non‐communicable diseases is increasing, but health systems are mainly focused on addressing infectious diseases. Methods Participants were adults undergoing computer‐assisted chest X‐ray screening for tuberculosis in a community‐wide tuberculosis prevalence survey in Blantyre, Malawi. Adults with abnormal radiographs by field radiographer interpretation were evaluated by a physician in a community‐based clinic. X‐ray classifications were compared to classifications of a random sample of normal chest X‐rays by radiographer interpretation. Radiographic features were classified using WHO Integrated Management for Adult Illnesses (IMAI) guidelines. All radiographs taken at the screening tent were analysed by the Qure.ai qXR v2.0 software. Results 5% (648/13,490) of adults who underwent chest radiography were identified to have an abnormal chest X‐ray by the radiographer. 387 (59.7%) of the participants attended the X‐ray clinic, and another 387 randomly sampled normal X‐rays were available for comparison. Participants who were referred to the community clinic had a significantly higher HIV prevalence than those who had been identified to have a normal CXR by the field radiographer (90 [23.3%] vs. 43 [11.1%] p‐value < 0.001). The commonest radiographic finding was cardiomegaly (20.7%, 95% CI 18.0–23.7). One in five (81/387) chest X‐rays were misclassified by the radiographer. The overall mean Qure.ai qXR v2.0 score for all reviewed X‐rays was 0.23 (SD 0.20). There was a high concordance of cardiomegaly classification between the physician and the computer‐assisted software (109/118, 92.4%). Conclusion There is a high burden of cardiomegaly on a chest X‐ray at a community level, much of which is in patients with diabetes, heart disease and high blood pressure. Cardiomegaly on chest X‐ray may be a potential tool for screening for cardiovascular NCDs at the primary care level as well as in the community.

Background TB is a leading cause of morbidity among HIV positive individuals. Accurate algorithms are needed to achieve early TB diagnosis and treatment. We investigated the use of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra in combination with chest radiography for TB diagnosis in ambulatory HIV positive individuals. Methods This was a randomised controlled trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design. Outpatient HIV clinic attendees with cough were randomised to four arms: Arm 1—Standard Xpert/no chest radiography (CXR); Arm 2—Standard Xpert/CXR; Arm 3—Xpert Ultra/no CXR; and Arm 4—Xpert Ultra/CXR. Participants were followed up at days 28 and 56 to assess for TB treatment initiation. Results We randomised 640 participants. Bacteriologically confirmed TB treatment initiation at day 28 were: Arm 1 (8.4% [14/162]), Arm 2 (6.9% [11/159]), Arm 3 (8.2% [13/159]) and Arm 4 (5.6% [9/160]) and between Xpert Ultra group (Arms 3 and 4) (6.9% [22/319]) vs Standard Xpert group (Arms 1 and 2) (7.8% [25/321]), risk ratio 0.89 (95% CI 0.51 to 1.54). By day 56, there were also similar all-TB treatment initiations in the x-ray group (Arms 2 and 4) (16.0% [51/319]) compared with the no x-ray group (Arms 1 and 3) (13.1% [42/321]), risk ratio 1.22 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.78); however, the contribution of clinically diagnosed treatment initiations were higher in x-ray groups (50.9% vs 19.0%). Conclusions Xpert Ultra performed similarly to Xpert MTB/RIF. X-rays are useful for TB screening but further research should investigate how to mitigate false-positive treatment initiations.

Rationale There is an urgent need for rapid, non-sputum point-of-care diagnostics to detect tuberculosis. Objectives This prospective trial in seven high tuberculosis burden countries set out to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the point-of-care urine-based lipoarabinomannan assay FUJIFILM SILVAMP TB LAM (FujiLAM) among inpatient and outpatient people living with HIV. Methods Diagnostic performance of FujiLAM at point of care was assessed among adult people with HIV against a mycobacterial reference standard (sputum culture, blood culture, and Xpert Ultra from urine and sputum at enrollment, and additional sputum culture ≤7 days from enrollment), an extended mycobacterial reference standard including available non-study test results, and a composite reference standard including clinical evaluation. Measurements and Main Results: Of 1624 participants enrolled, 294 (18.0%) were classified as TB positive by extended mycobacterial reference standard. Median age was 40 years, median CD4 cell count was 372 cells/ul, 52% were female and 78% were taking antiretroviral therapy at enrollment. Overall FujiLAM sensitivity was 54.8% (95% CI: 49.1-60.4), and overall specificity was 85.1% (83.1-86.9), against the extended mycobacterial reference standard. Sensitivity and specificity estimates varied between sites, ranging from 26.5% (95% CI: 17.4%-38.0%) to 83.3% (43.6%-97.0%), and 75.0 (65.0%-82.9%) to 96.5 (92.1%-98.5%), respectively. Post-hoc exploratory analysis identified significant variability in the performance of the six FujiLAM lots used in this study. Conclusions Lot variability limited interpretation of FujiLAM test performance. Although the results with the current version of FujiLAM are too variable for clinical decision-making, the lipoarabinomannan biomarker still holds promise for tuberculosis diagnostics.

No abstract