Goethe: "Let us live in as small a circle as we will, we are either debtors or creditors before we have had time to look around." (Elective Affinities, Bk. II, Ch. 4) R.ECENTLY, many critics of monetary policy, and some monetary policymakers as well, have asserted that the links between monetary aggregates and national economic policy variables-that is, GNP, inflation and real economic growth-have been severed by a host offinancial and credit market innovations. If these critics are correct, then a monetary policy based on targeting the growth of a monetary aggregate would become increasingly ineffective and inappropriate, as credit arrangements are substituted for monetary payments. 1 The purpose of this article is to provide a theoretical framework in which to assess these claims The author, an associate professor ofeconomics at The Pennsylvania State University, isa visiting scholaratthe Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. 'For examples, see Neil C. Berkman, "Abandoning Monetary Aggregates," in Controlling Monetary Aggregates Jil, proceedings ofaconference sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (October 1980), pp. 76-100; Benjamin M. Friedman, "The Relative Stability of Money and Credit 'Velocities' in the United States: Evidence and Some Speculations," NBER Working Paper No. 645 (March 1981); Anthony M. Solomon. "Financial Innovation and Monetary Policy" (remarks before the Joint Luncheon of the American Economic and American Finance Associations, December28, 1981); James M. Tobin, "Inflation," in Encyclopedia of Economics, Douglas Creenwald, ed. (McGraw-Hill, 1982), pp. 510-23. Forthe contraryposition-i.e., that monetary policy should be undertaken through effective control ofa monetary aggregate-see Milton Friedman, "Mone