Developing methods to provide high quality forage through a majority of the year is important for cattle operations. The purpose of this study was to determine forage management options to off-set the summer “slump” with fescue. Four grass pasture treatments (10 pastures total; 1.67 ha each) were used in a completely randomized design and stocked with growing heifers (initial wt 190 ± 9.1 kg). Pasture treatments consisted of fescue (FES; n = 2 pastures with 4 head/pasture), crabgrass (CRAB; n = 3 pastures with 4 head/pasture), bermudagrass (BERM; n = 3 pastures with 5 head/pasture), and sorghum-sudan interseeded into fescue (SS-FES; n = 2 pastures with 6 head/pasture from April to July, then 4 head/pasture from July to November). Heifers were weighed in April, May, July, September, and November. Heifers assigned to FES/SS-FES pastures grazed from April to November (213 d) and for CRAB and BERM treatments, May through September (131 d). Heifers on FES grazed continuously, while other grass treatments were rotationally grazed. Heifers remained in treatment pasture through the entire grazing period. Data were analyzed using mixed procedures of SAS with pasture as experimental unit. Average daily gain for the entire grazing period was greater for heifers on SS-FES as compared to all other grass treatments (P = 0.001). Between April and May, FES heifers had greater ADG than SS-FES (P = 0.001); yet, heavier stocking rate in SS-FES resulted in similar BW gain/ha (P = 0.16). May to July ADG and BW gain/ha was greatest for BERM, then CRAB, with FES and SS-FES having the lowest gains (P < 0.001). From July through September, ADG was greater for SS-FES and CRAB as compared to FES, with BERM intermediate (P = 0.03); and BW gain/ha tended to be lower for FES compared to other treatments (P = 0.10). Average daily gain and BW gain/ha were greater for SS-FES than FES (P = 0.001) from late September to November. As a summer grazing option, warm season grass alternatives, either as the sole source of pasture or interseeded into fescue, are better options for gain as compared to fescue alone.
A total of 80 crossbred, high-risk heifers (initially 250 ± 4.2 kg BW), were transported from an Oklahoma City, Oklahoma sale barn to the Kansas State University Beef Cattle Research Center. Cattle were unloaded and randomly placed into one of four receiving pens and provided ad libitum hay and water. Each pen was randomly assigned to one of four rest-times before processing: 1) immediately upon arrival (0); 2) after a 6-h rest period (6); 3) after a 24-h rest period (24); and 4) after a 48-h rest period (48). After all cattle were processed, heifers were allotted into individual pens with ad libitum access to a receiving ration and water. Heifers were weighed individually on d 0, 7, 14, 21, 28 and 35 to calculate average daily gain (ADG). Feed added and refusals were measured daily to determine dry matter intake (DMI). A fecal egg count reduction test and analysis of blood serum metabolites were also conducted. All data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS (v. 9.4, Cary, NC) with individual animal as the experimental unit. Processing time did not impact (P > 0.05) heifer BW or ADG. From d 0 to 35, DMI decreased linearly (P = 0.027) as rest time increased. The number of days for heifers to reach a DMI of 2.5% BW was linearly increased (P = 0.023) as rest time increased. There was no evidence of differences (P ≥ 0.703) among rest times for feed efficiency. While morbidity did not differ between treatments (P > 0.10), mortality increased linearly (P = 0.026) as the time of rest increased. A significant processing time × day interaction (P < 0.0001) was observed for the prevalence of fecal parasites, where the percentage of positive samples was significantly lower 14-d after anthelmintic treatment, regardless of the processing time. Serum IBR titer for heifers processed at either 0 or 6-h upon arrival was significantly higher (P < 0.01) on d 35 compared to d 0. Heifers processed after a 48-h rest period had significantly higher glucose values (P < 0.01) on d 0 compared to heifers processed at 0, 6, or 24-h. In summary, rest time prior to processing did not impact receiving calf growth performance. A 6-h rest period upon arrival appeared to be most beneficial to DMI. Anthelmintic treatment at processing reduced the parasitic load in heifers processed at all times. Vaccine titer did not increase after initial processing in heifers processed 24- or 48-h after arrival, indicating the seroconversion of IBR antibodies during the longer rest period.
It is common for feedyards to rest cattle after transport and prior to administration of their receiving vaccinations in an attempt to minimize transport stress and optimize vaccine efficacy and subsequent growth and performance. This study aimed to test how time of rest after feedlot heifer arrival impacts vaccine titer and blood metabolites indicating cattle health. Eighty mixed-breed heifers (250 ± 4.2 kg BW) were purchased at live auction in Oklahoma City, OK and transported to the Kansas State University in Manhattan. Heifers were allotted in a completely randomized design to one of four treatments processed at 0, 6, 24, or 48 hours after arrival. At the time of processing (d 0) and again on d 35, serum samples were collected and analyzed for infectious bovine rhinotrachitis (IBR) titer, large animal chemistry panel, and hepatic profile by the Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory. There were time × treatment interactions (P < 0.02) for serum IBR titer, glucose, urea nitrogen, and bicarbonate. Specifically, heifers had greater (P < 0.05) IBR titer on d 35 than d 0, as expected because they were vaccinated upon arrival. Upon arrival, cattle held for 48 hours prior to processing had significantly greater (P < 0.05) glucose than those held for 24 hours (108 vs. 68 mg/dL, respectively), with no differences in processing treatment by d 35. Urea nitrogen levels in cattle held for 6, 24, or 48 hr prior to processing were greater (P < 0.05) than those held for 0 hours on d 0 or for any length of time by d 35. Finally, cattle held for 0 or 48 hr prior to processing had lower (P < 0.05) bicarbonate levels on d 0 than those held for 6 or 24 hours by d 35. These data show that while initial rest may be helpful to normalize blood metabolites, cattle should be placed within 24 hours of arrival. However, most blood metabolite levels normalize within 35 days.
Pork producers have recently inquired whether the allotment of feed should be greater during the wean-to-estrus interval to optimize sow performance. The objective of this experiment was to validate the amount of feed allotted to sows during the wean-to-estrus interval to optimize feed costs and farrowing performance. A total of 257 PIC 1050 (PIC, Inc., Hendersonville, TN) weaned sows were blocked to 3 body condition categories (thin, ideal, or heavy, respectively) and then randomly allotted to 1 of 2 feed quantity treatments (2.7 or 5.4 kg, respectively) on d 0. The sows used in this experiment were housed under commercial conditions and had an average parity of 3.15. One day prior to weaning, each sow was calipered to determine body condition and feed boxes were validated to determine that the desired amount of feed was actually allocated during the experimental period. Sows were fed their allotted amount of feed (2.7 or 5.4 kg, respectively) from d 0 till the sows were serviced or if the sows had not been detected in estrus until d 8. Sows were tracked through their subsequent wean to detect any downstream differences. Data were analyzed using Proc MIXED (SAS 9.4; Cary, NC) with sow as the experimental unit, treatment as the main effect, and caliper score as the block criteria. These data indicate that allocating 5.4 kg of feed did not improve wean-to-first service interval (2.7 kg = 4.4 d vs. 5.4 kg = 4.4 d; P = 0.99), farrowing rate (2.7 kg = 91.5% vs. 5.4 kg = 90.6%; P = 0.81), or total born (2.7 kg = 15.9 vs. 5.4 kg = 15.4 pigs/litter; P = 0.31). In summary, feeding greater than 2.7 kg of feed from wean-to-estrus does not improve sow performance, but does increase feed costs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.